Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Books: Power politics over a chess board

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Books: Power politics over a chess board

    Washington Times, DC
    Jan 4 2009


    BOOKS: Power politics over a chess board

    HOW THE COLD WAR WAS FOUGHT ON THE CHESSBOARD
    By Daniel Johnson
    Houghton Mifflin, $26, 416 pages


    REVIEWED BY DOUG BANDOW

    Thought to have originated in India in the sixth century A.D., the
    beautiful game of chess finally has returned home. The current world
    champion is Viswanathan Anand of India.

    He is only the third non-Soviet (or Russian post-Soviet break-up)
    since 1948 to hold a world chess title. Journalist Daniel Johnson
    explains, "it is impossible to write the history of chess during the
    Cold War period without contrasting the rival political, economic, and
    social systems. Only a book that got to the heart of the matter, to
    what made the evil empire evil, could give the Cold War chess
    grandmasters their context."

    Chess probably entered Russia during the early-16th century. Several
    czars and czarinas played the game, as did a number of Soviet
    revolutionaries, including Leon Trotsky and Vladimir Lenin. Notes
    Mr. Johnson, "Chess has always exerted a peculiar magnetism for
    megalomaniacs, from Napoleon to Castro."

    However, support for chess became a matter of politics. Nikolai
    Vasilyevich Krylenko was, reports Mr. Johnson, one of the few
    Bolsheviks "who had the sacred privilege of playing chess with Lenin."
    In the mid-1920s, Krylenko established centralized control over the
    game and, in Mr. Johnson's words, drafted a "five year plan for
    chess," mobilizing the game "as part of the increasingly totalitarian
    direction of society." As Commissar of Justice, Krylenko helped
    prosecute Stalin's campaign of terror, which consumed many in the
    chess world. Krylenko himself was arrested in 1937 and executed the
    following year.

    Russian Alexander Alekhine actually won the title in 1927. But he
    played for France and remained in Nazi-occupied Europe during World
    War II. Only after he died in 1946 did Moscow truly claim the chess
    crown as its own when Mikhail Botvinnik won the tournament to select
    Alekhine's successor. With success came privilege - and
    danger. Explains Johnson:

    "Botvinnik was treated as a favored son, though that favor was
    strictly conditional on his continuing success against Western
    grandmasters. The minister of heavy industry, Grigory Ordzhonikadze,
    rewarded him with a car. Apart from the vehicles assigned to the
    nomenklatura, Botvinnik's may well have been the only private car in
    the Soviet Union. A year later, Ordzhonikadze vanished into the vortex
    of the Terror. Botvinnik was fortunate not to join him."

    Government control brought resources. Writes Mr. Johnson, "the
    practical basis of the Soviet school of chess was its colossal
    infrastructure. From 150,000 registered players in 1929, the numbers
    grew to half a million in the mid-1930s. By the 1950s they had reached
    1 million and would eventually peak at 5 million." Those who won
    received bountiful wages and unusual travel opportunities, which
    "conferred almost unimaginable privilege."


    Ultimately, the Soviets became victims of "the rumbustious
    individualism of the American way of life," notes Mr. Johnson. Bobby
    Fischer was brilliant but erratic, in contrast to the dull but
    disciplined Soviet machine. By the mid-1960s, Botvinnik had been
    dethroned, ultimately replaced by Boris Spassky, a relative
    nonconformist among the Soviet players. He proved to be the unlucky
    victim when Fischer's will to win overcame the latter's mercurial
    temperament.

    While watching chess has been derided as akin to watching grass grow,
    the process leading to Fischer's victory provided world-class
    entertainment, ably described in "White King and Red Queen."
    Mr. Johnson pays particular attention to the tumultuous impact of
    Fischer's triumph on the Soviet chess machine. After Fischer won the
    first "candidate's" match, blanking Soviet grandmaster Mark Taimanov
    by the shocking score of six-zip, Taimanov found himself in disgrace.

    Fischer then took out the Dane Bent Larsen by the same score and in
    the penultimate match crunched former Soviet world champion Tigran
    Petrosian by the astonishing margin of four points. Yet Fischer's
    bizarre antics almost sank the championship match against Boris
    Spassky. National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger even called
    Fischer, urging him to show up in Reykjavik for the match.

    Once both players sat down at the chessboard, the result seemed
    inevitable. With Fischer taking a strong lead, writes Mr. Johnson,
    "the real battle again shifted away from the board. It was plain to
    all that only a miracle could stop Fischer now. Being good communists,
    the Soviet team did not believe in miracles; they believed in
    conspiracies instead. The fear of what might await them back in Moscow
    fueled the atmosphere of paranoia that had pervaded the Spassky camp."
    At one point, the Icelandic authorities x-rayed Fischer's chair and
    disassembled a lamp to check for listening devices.

    Fischer's triumph heralded the slow, painful end of the Soviet chess
    system. Apparatchik Anatoly Karpov won the title in 1975 by default in
    a dispute over match conditions. Mr. Karpov then twice defeated Soviet
    Viktor Korchnoi, who fell into disfavor before defecting, and whose
    family became an unofficial pawn in the struggle. But next came Garry
    Kasparov. Notes Mr. Johnson, "His Armenian-Jewish background made it
    more likely that the boy would grow up to be a champion not only of
    chess but of dissidents, too."

    Although a product of the Soviet chess machine, Mr. Kasparov
    ultimately joined Fischer in modeling arrogant individuality against
    the Communist system. Mr. Karpov and Mr. Kasparov fought four bitter
    matches, which left the latter the undisputed world champion. Explains
    Mr. Johnson, "The Kasparov-Karpov duel was the climax of the story of
    chess and the Cold War. That story is also a hitherto untold chapter
    in the history of liberty."

    Both the Soviet Union and international chess order collapsed
    thereafter, as Mr. Kasparov and other grandmasters broke from FIDE,
    the international chess federation. Although still the game's
    highest-rated player, Mr. Kasparov retired from chess in 2005 to fight
    for democracy in Russia. The two separate chess crowns were finally
    reunited, with Mr. Anand the current titleholder. Once a symbol of
    international political conflict, chess has returned to its more
    boring status as "only" a game.

    Yet the Cold War struggle over chess continues to enthrall many of us
    patzers. Mr. Johnson argues that chess "almost uniquely had resisted
    the totalitarian takeover of every aspect of culture. However much the
    ideologues and gangsters in the Kremlin might try to politicize the
    game, they could not control the moves on the board." In the end, he
    observes of Mr. Kasparov, "The supreme intellectual product of the
    Soviet system turned against his masters, in the process exposing
    their claims as hollow and mendacious." For that we all should be
    thankful.

    ¢ Doug Bandow, a former special assistant to President Reagan, is a
    fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

    http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/j an/04/playing-chess-during-cold-war/
Working...
X