Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Direct Message Cleve Peace Groups

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Direct Message Cleve Peace Groups

    Cleveland Indy Media, OH
    Jan 5 2009


    DIRECT MESSAGE CLEVE PEACE GROUPS!
    by deja vu Sunday, Jan. 04, 2009 at 3:42 PM


    DIRECT MESSAGE! NORTH-EAST OHIO ANTI-WAR COALITION,CLEV CATHOLIC
    WORKER,CLEV NON-VIOLENCE NETWORK,CLEV PEACE ACTION,CLEV SDS


    Israel is Guilty of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity

    By The Angryindian

    `Thus we conclude that we cannot promise anything to the Arabs of the
    Land of Israel or the Arab countries. Their voluntary agreement is out
    of the question. Hence those who hold that an agreement with the
    natives is an essential condition for Zionism can now say `no' and
    depart from Zionism. Zionist colonization, even the most restricted,
    must either be terminated or carried out in defiance of the will of
    the native population. This colonization can, therefore, continue and
    develop only under the protection of a force independent of the local
    population ` an iron wall which the native population cannot break
    through. This is, in toto, our policy towards the Arabs. To formulate
    it any other way would only be hypocrisy.'

    Vladimir Jabotinsky - The Iron Wall, (We and the Arabs)

    "It would be my greatest sadness to see Zionists (Jews) do to
    Palestinian Arabs much of what Nazis did to Jews."

    Albert Einstein


    At the very certain risk of being condemned as an anti-Semite for
    saying what needs to be said, I will say it openly and without
    reservation: the State of Israel is guilty of Arab Palestinian
    Genocide and crimes against humanity. As I write this, the
    Euro-settler Zionist State of Israel has officially entered its
    seventh day of deliberate ethnocide against what is left of indigenous
    Palestine. More than 420 Palestinians have been killed, more than 2000
    critically injured and its utility and transportation infrastructure
    has been ground to a complete halt.

    Israeli's chief propagandist Mark Regev, is on record for attributing
    the existence of the pro-independence Hamas government for the attacks
    and claims that Hamas wilfully encouraged this crisis by not agreeing
    to extend the latest U.S.-sponsored truce the Israelis violated
    several times since it was enacted. Regev fails to impart these facts
    when he tells the international media that, "Hamas escalated the
    situation last week with their rocket barrages against Israeli
    civilians."

    So far 3 Israeli civilians have died and one Israeli Defence Forces
    soldier has been killed since all this began and this bluntly brief
    casualty list is being reported as the real tragedy of the
    conflict. U.S. government representatives have gone so far as to point
    to these deaths as the moral rallying issue to assert the Euro-settler
    state's inalienable `right to exist' in occupied Palestine, as opposed
    to the indigenous Palestinian Arab right to exist at all. Meanwhile,
    while Israel's rights are being discussed, Palestinians continue to
    become silhouettes of red mist. The morgues are overflowing with the
    battered and torn brown bodies of the victims, pitiful blood
    splattered and demoralised human clumps of what remains of Arab
    Palestine. And Israel says it is just getting started.

    Hopelessly trapped within the world's largest indigenous reservation,
    the native people of Palestine have little left to defend themselves
    with other than their intense will to survive. This tenacity to exist
    is treated as a crime against the State of Israel and the entire
    population of The Gaza, each and every Palestinian, is being held
    accountable for resisting their own genocide.

    Yesterday an Israeli Air Defence aeroplane plunged a one tonne-pound
    bomb into the home of a high-level Hamas' official assassinating him,
    his wife and their children along with 18 of his neighbours. Instead
    of shock, Israeli spokespersons, U.S. officials and the world
    newspapers are calling this a concrete positive step forward in
    Mid-East peace process. An entire family has been killed in their home
    and politicians and pundits are calling actions such as these
    `progress.' Arab collateral damage be dammed.

    The appalling apathetic disdain accorded the Palestinian people and
    their life and death struggle against a brutal Zionist
    Lebenstraumpolitik is as of this very moment without parallel in this
    century or the last. Even the much older Armenian Genocide has
    received more attention and investigation at this time than the
    in-your-face ethnic cleansing occurring right now before our eyes. And
    the deafening silence of the international community sums up precisely
    which side the world wants to win.

    The UN Security Council recently demonstrated this when it declined an
    opportunity to issue a resolution censuring the saturation bombing of
    The Gaza. A draft presented by Libyan representatives of the Arab
    League calling for an immediate end to hostilities and condemnation of
    the State of Israel under the UN charter was promptly vetoed,
    unambiguously implying to victim and victimiser alike that the UN
    member nations do indeed support the genocide of the Palestinian
    people. To argue any other analysis is intellectual cowardice of the
    worse kind. It is conscious complicity with the planned ethnic
    eradication of Palestinian Arabs. In essence, it is the same as openly
    calling for their genocide.

    And everyone is tripping over themselves to jump on the pro-Israel,
    anti-Palestinian semantic bandwagon. Barack Obama and his staff have
    officially accused any Palestinian who rejects being a punching bag
    for Jewish insecurities a terrorist and an enemy of the Jewish race,
    the only crime against humanity recognised by the world community. He
    further asserted Israel's distinctive `right to exist' and scolded
    Hamas and their fellow Palestinians for not laying down and dying on
    cue.

    The new President-Elect, otherwise known as the `The Change,' is
    clearly making good on his promise to the American Israel Public
    Affairs Committee (AIPAC) that Israeli Apartheid would be supported by
    his administration. He promptly confirmed this pledge by appointing
    Rahm Israel Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist, as his White
    House Chief of Staff. Logically one is left to conclude that once
    Obama gets the keys to the White House, the new administration will
    continue the practices of past administrations by engaging in
    pro-Zionist protectionism. The falsifications and outright deceptions
    of the `special U.S.-Israeli relationship' will carry on and the
    material and ideological support for this ongoing racist genocide will
    never actually cease.

    Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak has publicly identified this
    anti-Arab pogrom as a justified "all-out war against Hamas and its
    kind." This broad brush means exactly what it implies, that Israel
    will employ extreme prejudice against all officers and operatives of
    Hamas, inclusive of anyone Israel thinks they can get away with
    labelling as Hamas and shall regard the projected widespread
    collateral damage as `preventative action' against `indeterminate'
    `elements' of Hamas extant amongst the entire Palestinian
    population. In effect, Israel is targeting every Palestinian that
    dared vote `yes' for Hamas, more than 90 percent of the refugee
    population. In no uncertain terms, Israel intends to exterminate the
    Palestinian people as a whole, until there is nothing left but the
    memory of indigenous Palestine. Then they will obliterate the memory
    of the Palestinian people entirely.

    Image via WikipediaWe have seen this before. This is the perverse
    arithmetic of genocide, the cardinal sin of a civil society and a
    moral lesson one would think the world's Jews would viscerally
    appreciate. With the western world inundated with reminders of the
    singular uniqueness of `The Holocaust' and its overtly ethnocentric
    focus on the extermination of the Ashkenazim, one could be forgiven
    for presupposing that European Jews should be the last people in the
    world with the moral vacancy to commit a genocide.

    And make no mistake, this is a genocide. It is a Euro-supremacist war
    of ethnic extermination against a people long regarded in mythic
    European Orientalism as a sub-human, oversexed collection of racial
    inferiors. Caricatured as dusky, robed sand-dwellers carelessly
    beheading each other in the hot sun, the Arab represents to the bigot
    a cipher, a nonentity that the European Israeli-colonialist is under
    no obligation to respect. In this light, the Israeli Jew has indeed
    spiritually come full circle with his post-WW2 credentials as a
    `white' group. Now accepted as an ethnic European, he has finally
    found common ground between his theological tradition, his own
    struggle with anti-Jewish ethnic hatred and the ideological trappings
    of historical White racialism by colonially characterizing the Arab as
    a non-person therefore deserving of castigation. An outlandish
    variation on what they themselves have long endured at the hands of
    Europeans since the salad days of the pagan Roman Empire.

    But with liberal backing from the gentile American Empire, the Jew,
    once branded the plague of the world, can pretend that what is
    happening in occupied Palestine is not a matter of anti-Arab racial
    prejudice. This is an ethical injustice within itself but it needs to
    be pointed out that the entire push behind U.S. and European support
    for Israel is the deep-seated desire to defend White Power in Western
    Asia. This is an issue of global European hegemony and the Israeli Jew
    knows that this is the currency, not a love for Jews, which keeps
    Israel afloat. So while the obvious analogies to German Nazism are
    undeniably accurate, it does not convey the reality that Israel is
    allowed to kill Arabs at will purely because it supplements an already
    extant pro-White racist agenda. And the Israeli Jew has bought into
    this paradigm hook, line and sinker.

    To be fair, Israel's psychological and socio-cultural anxiety is
    understandable considering the history of their historical
    oppression. But this in no way pardons the Zionist lobby within Israel
    or the United States from the well-deserved comparisons to German
    Nazism and all the elements that sober charge implies. The Israeli Jew
    truly stands on thin ice. The mind-set that defines every living
    Palestinian as a representative threat to Jewish security is no less
    xenophobic or less cold-blooded than anything the Nazis ever devised
    or attempted.

    This includes the bizarre contradiction of what actually represents
    realistic anti-Semitism. Arabs are a Semitic people, so clearly any
    activity aimed at marginalising and eliminating the Palestinian
    population is by fiat anti-Semitic. But you will never hear such an
    analysis within the `acceptable' mainstream debate. The only real
    defence Israel actually has is the power to accuse its critics of
    vicious anti-Jewish bias. It is a semantic weapon the Zionist lobby
    uses with considerable force against any moral umbrage to their goal
    of an Arab-free Jewish state. In a world where Jews can embrace the
    ugly business of racial superiorities, territorial exploitation and
    the ethnic extermination agenda of the Third Reich with a straight
    face, it is not an exaggeration to say that none of us are safe.

    Modern Israel's spiritual connections to Nazism present an ironic
    twist on the line of defence employed by the German high command when
    they claimed to be in reality ardent Zionists seeking a solution to
    voluntary Jewish emigration out of Europe. This is satirically
    substantiated by the fact that some Zionists actively pursued this
    strategy, clandestinely meeting with sympathetic German officials
    willing to help transport Jews to Palestine, (then under British
    occupation) in return for Jewish assistance in fighting the Allies on
    behalf of Nazi Germany. These paradoxes almost never earn intelligent
    commentary and when the discourse is forced to acknowledge the overtly
    Naziesque aspects of Israeli policy, critics are severely downplayed
    as vociferous proponents of anti-Semitism. For the Zionist, his cause
    is Jewish survival by any means necessary and indigenous Palestinian
    Arabs just happen to be in the way.

    This is the fundamental ingredient of the Zionist equation. After
    suffering centuries of ethnic persecution, the Jew has for all
    accounts and purposes claimed the right to operate like a Nazi
    providing that he does not act out his racial psychosis in precisely
    the same fashion as the original Nazis did theirs. And no matter what
    Israel does short of shoving Arabs into ovens, it is regarded as an
    improvement over what was allowed to occur during the European
    holocaust. As long as Israel and the United States maintain that the
    real targets of the onslaught is Hamas, the public morality will be
    satisfied, international legality negated and the murder of
    Palestinians will persist.

    On this there is consensus, although there shouldn't be, given that
    the Palestinian holocaust could not occur without the ideological
    support of world opinion. The apparatus of mass media propaganda being
    what it is and the grand sweep of U.S. influence being what it is,
    this is not a surprise. But what is most revolting about the Israeli
    ethnocide programme is the argument that their brand of racism is
    proper and religiously sanctioned. If you objectively compare
    examples, excuses for German atrocities in no way differ in character
    and absurdity from the justifications offered by Israel and its
    supporters. It is no less absent of moral or intellectual fibre than
    the unforgivable crimes the German Nazis committed and for which the
    present-day German still humbly apologises for. And even more ironic,
    they are supported in this analysis by scores of xenophobic Holocaust
    deniers such as Patrick Buchanan who are vocally critical of Israelis
    support in the U.S. government. These are people vigorously opposed to
    the existence of a Jewish state yet they are not considered by Israel
    and their supporters to be a threat to Jewish existence.

    I find this quite odd since it was the social perpetuation and wiling
    encouragement of German Judeophobia which sent civilians like Julius
    Streicher to the gallows at Nuremberg. Today's neo-Nazis might
    occasionally be labelled anti-Semitic, and that's without a doubt a
    correct assessment, but they are never identified as threats to the
    existence of world Jewry. Any cursory visit to the numerous White
    Power websites available on the Internet clearly demonstrate that
    neo-Nazi attitudes have never gone away and that Europeans could
    potentially reverse their tolerance of Jews at any given time. It is
    thus a matter of obvious importance that the Israeli must consider the
    implications of such things the next time the IDF drops another weapon
    of mass destruction onto a Palestinian refugee village. It is
    imperative that we all think about the ethical implications of quietly
    watching European Jews committing racial atrocities and the
    significance of world opinion while the killing of Arab "savages"
    rages on unobstructed by the world community.


    December 30, 2008 -- Approximately 200 hundred activists gathered at
    the Seattle Federal Building at 4 pm today to demand the end of the
    bombing of Gaza. Although the call to action was made only 72 hours
    earlier, Seattle activists joined tens of thousands of other people
    across America showing their disgust at Israel's war crimes. Photo:
    Seattle Indymedia There is another matter, what of the moral centre of
    the Israeli Jew? This is the question of the hour. How does a Jew,
    either directly involved in active participation of anti-Arab racism
    or residing somewhere safe in the Hebrew Diaspora, stand silent in the
    face of such overwhelming inhumanity? How does one sit on the
    sidelines parasitically feeding off of Israel's considerable political
    clout while cheering on the slaughter of defenceless Arab men, women
    and children? Is the cost of Jewish survival the genocide of the
    Palestinian Arabs? If this is so, the Israeli Jew and the Zionist
    lackey should have the courage to say so outright without the
    propagandistic posturing of obligatory self-defence against global
    Judeophobia. The Palestinian refugee is the victim, not the colonial
    Israeli. To argue otherwise is an insult to common sense and basic
    human rights.

    It is a frustrating dichotomy. Nearly everything articulated today as
    criticism of Israel and of Jews in particular is hopelessly embedded
    within the race-conscious western jingoism of `civilisation' and
    `progress,' all delivered with a Kiplingesque charade of piteous
    humility. Systematic IDF abuses and covert Mossad assassination
    programmes notwithstanding, Israel is portrayed is a beacon of
    democratic evolution in the Middle East, not a racist Euro-settler
    state endlessly terrorizing a refugee indigenous population that they
    brutally and rakishly displaced. Instead of the historical and
    political reality of Israel, we are fed just the opposite, a mirage of
    mistruths and distortions intended to mask the reality of an anti-Arab
    race war. A war supported by the entire world.

    It has been argued that the use of the words genocide, Israel and Jews
    within the same sentence is offensive, anti-Semitic and racially
    divisive unless the discussion is steadfastly centred on the European
    tradition of furtive Judeophobia and the remembrance of the Ashkenazim
    victims of a singular human holocaust. It is a stifled conversation
    laboured with the pathological Protestant guilt Gentiles harbour for
    their apathy and hushed ideological support for the Catholics and
    Pagan mystics who endeavoured to cleanse Europe of `inferior races'
    and peoples. The expected psychosomatic atonement for sitting on their
    arses while Europe burned its minorities in the contemporary era is
    generally assumed to take the form of the rush to convey unconditional
    support for the State of Israel and its countless atrocities against
    Indigenous Palestinians. But despite the appearance of apologetic
    moral penance, sympathy and respect for the trials and tribulations of
    the Jewish people is not the real motivation.

    The moral and material support the State of Israel receives is not
    genuine empathy at all but in fact represents a brutal form of
    racialist realpolitik. As long as the State of Israel is of vital
    strategic and Euro-settler importance to the United States and the
    `core' European powers in Western Asia, the Palestinian genocide will
    be allowed to continue. The State of Israel in reality serves two
    distinct purposes; it is a zone of refuge for world Jewry who survived
    the Catholic attempt to eradicate their numbers in Europe and second,
    it serves as a militarized client-state that reinforces western aims
    and political influence in the Middle-East.

    This is possible because after World War Two, Jews, primarily the
    Ashkenazim, have become `White enough' to merit all the assumed rights
    of pillage and colonial spoils theoretically accorded to each and
    every White person at birth. The string of arbitrary unearned
    privileges traditionally enjoyed by Whites that mechanically supersede
    the human rights of others groups. Some Jews have even joined the
    overtly Judeophobic Ku Klux Klan in the United States and neo-Nazi
    Israelis are not unheard of these days. White makes right and the
    reverse engineering the State of Israel has done with German fascism
    is a fascinating thing to see. I suspect that Josef Goebbels would
    find it all perversely humorous had he not blown his brains out at the
    end of the war.

    Israel and its pro-Zionist Goyim supporters routinely play the
    `holocaust card,' the propagandistic notion that an Israeli genocide
    of Arab Palestinians is necessary to prevent another genocide attempt
    against Europe's Jews. A paradoxical quandary if one ever existed, but
    it in truth a play on the classic fall-back position of the
    colonialist. The charge that it is they, the invader, who is the
    injured party impartially defending themselves against malevolent
    forces opposed to the `civilisation' they have kindly jammed down the
    native throat with the butt of a rifle. It is the last refuge of the
    colonial racist when called to defend his reckless desire to
    obliterate any perceived threat to the authority or psychological
    security of the invader.

    Emotive rationalisations pardoning the State of Israel for its written
    and unwritten policies of anti-Arab xenophobia fall on deaf ears
    now. Too many children have died. Too many lives have been shattered
    beyond repair. A Zionist blanket of death has descended upon the
    Palestinian people and hundreds of broken bodies litter the Gazan
    landscape as the world watches and says little and does less. This is
    what remains left of Arab Palestine. A charnel ground of post-WW2
    White colonialism in Western Asia.

    The Zionist government argues that the racist butchery of its defence
    forces is solely devoted to combating Palestinian terrorism, namely
    the very existence of Hamas, the actual government-in-exile of the
    Palestinian people. Despite their capitulation to democratic
    representative politics and their unprecedented participation in a
    U.S.-sponsored general election that brought them to power, Hamas is
    still unjustly pigeonholed as a terror organisation rather than as the
    liberation movement they actually represent. But if the Zionist State
    of Israel wants to get into particulars about what constitutes
    terrorism, it should open discussion about Zionist terrorism and how
    this earned them a Jewish homeland.

    Before Hamas or Hezbollah ever existed there was the Stern Gang (Lehi)
    and Irgun (National Military Organization in the Land of
    Israel). Before the Munich action by angry young Palestinians, there
    was Deir Yassin, where 254 Palestinian villagers were executed during
    the chaotic last days of the British Mandate by brigades of Jewish
    terrorists, namely fighters of Lehi and Irgun, between the 9th and
    11th of April in 1948. The Palestinian is responding to violence, not
    initiating it. But one must be willing move beyond the rhetorical
    pro-Israeli, pro-racist fluff to see the situation as it is to
    understand that. And since the very same people involved in the
    movement to purge Palestine of U.S. and British occupation in the
    1940's are directly responsible for the Arab Palestinian genocide
    which began 1948, why is anyone surprised by the current bloodbath?

    Following the last global war, the western moral crusade for a
    capitalist-led world peace brought on by any means necessary would
    come to arrogantly flout the very humanism it maintains characterizes
    the present-day `War on Terror.' In the zealous pursuit of a
    full-spectrum Europocentric world order, the concept of world peace is
    regarded politically as a fluid hypothesis subject to instantaneous
    revision. As outlined by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC)
    dossier, peace is assurance in knowing that the United States and its
    client-entities (in particular the State of Israel) suffer no
    significant political challenges or effectual non-compliance to their
    aims of global hegemony. The existence of the State of Israel is a
    crucial geographical element to this equation and Jews fearful of yet
    another attempt at anti-Jewish eradication are willing to act as
    America's bottom-bitch in the `Middle-East' in trade for a nation and
    an indigenous genocide all their own.

    What we have here in essence is a model of peace solely defined by
    expansionist Euro-imperial standards. A system of planetary-wide
    Manifest Destiny ideologically steeped in the quasi-occultist
    philosophies that circulated in Christianized Europe prior to the
    extreme Aryanism of the Third Reich. The myth of a divine European
    master race as hailed in verse by Guido Von List, Rudyard Kipling and
    every Pope ever appointed to the Holy See. A morality of state
    oppression, elitist greed, plutocracy and racial stratification
    championed and rehearsed in that respective order. The necessary
    illusion of perpetual wars against terror, against the collapse of
    `civilisation' itself, have proved to be more than enough to satiate
    the consciousnesses of those of us psychologically encapsulated within
    the doctrinal paradigms of western predatory capitalism. We can coolly
    witness the destruction of an entire ethnic group, provided the
    victims are not `White' and call ourselves Jehovah's chosen without
    experiencing the pangs of paradoxical heaving.

    The European structure of imperial criminality has always maintained a
    veneer of legality in regard to its own offences. Like war, the
    European world powers recognise amongst themselves a pithy assortment
    of extremely flexible rules concerning the acceptable use of military
    force by a government against internally colonialized or significantly
    weaker populations. These conventions have long been codified in
    black-letter international law and are based on what became known as
    the Nuremberg Principles, the legal strategy created to address the
    civilian atrocities of the last internal European tribal conflict of
    the last century.

    The glaring paradox of acceptable rules for warfare aside, The
    Principles were used as a strategy for convicting German and later
    Japanese officers, politicians and industrialists of military and
    political delinquency by the Allied Powers and in the case of Julius
    Streicher; they were also decisive in convicting civilians for
    encouraging transgressions against specific human populations. In
    short, the legal if not ethical framework for the identification,
    prevention and prosecution of a genocide in the post-WW2 information
    age has been long understood, copiously documented and duly
    established as a punishable offence. Plainly, it is an international
    crime to engage in extremes of human incivility and savagery, period.

    In the decades following the European and Japanese war trials of the
    1940's, these international conventions were selectively put to use
    against states engaging in crimes against humanity. In practise
    however, these laws were chiefly used against individual political
    personalities either opposed to or no longer useful to Euro-Imperial
    neo-liberalism. Anti-colonial Cuban leader and revolutionary icon
    Dr. Fidel Ruz Castro has been repeatedly and falsely accused of
    genocide, yet the Chinese government under Mao commenced a real
    genocide in Tibet which is still maintained by the post-Tiananmen
    neo-capitalists currently running the country. Harsh language may be
    used sporadically in condemnation of China for its actions in limiting
    a western-style Tibetan democracy, but few dare call what China is
    doing to the Tibetan people a genocide. The Balkan ethnic massacres of
    the 1990's were deemed to be ethnic as well as theological genocides
    and people were prosecuted, while East Timor's indigenous holocaust
    still struggles for similar recognition, respect and legal
    action. Genocide in African states might receive a bit of mention here
    and there and infrequently produce a book or a trial or two, but the
    genocide of Aboriginal peoples in Africa, in the Americas and in Asia
    typically garner no mention at all.

    So it should of no surprise to anyone, let alone the Palestinians that
    in the wake of Israel's aggressive return to murderous 1967-style
    military action in The Gaza, a clear challenge to international law is
    occurring and no one really cares. The entire world is looking the
    other way as Palestinians die en masse and no one cares enough to tell
    Israel to its face that it is a homicidal out of control colonialist
    settler-state that should hang its head in shame for enacting their
    very own Final Solution.

    As a person of Ashkenazim extraction by way of a fairly diminutive
    blood-quantum, I challenge the Jews of the world to come to grips with
    what is being done in their name. I am no longer interested in hearing
    about the lost tribes and the terrorism of the European pogroms if you
    insist on slaughtering the very people whose lands you have already
    stolen at bayonet-point.

    I cannot and will not respect anyone, especially a colonial population
    of genocide survivors, who in turn have the nerve to practice
    genocide. Jewish Nazism is still Nazism, even if brief passages from
    the Talmud are tucked under the yarmulkes of the murderous gunmen of
    the IDF.


    The Angryindian
    Editor, Inteligentaindigena Novajoservo

    http://cleveland.indymedia.org/news/2009/01/3387 1.php
Working...
X