Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Secular "Anti-Zionist" Jewish Groups Echo Zionist Groups

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Secular "Anti-Zionist" Jewish Groups Echo Zionist Groups

    SECULAR "ANTI-ZIONIST" JEWISH GROUPS ECHO ZIONIST GROUPS
    By Mary Rizzo

    Online Journal
    Feb 3, 2009, 00:34

    A very strange thing is happening at this moment within a circle of
    people who like to consider themselves at the cutting edge of the
    struggle for the Palestine, and we are referring to the individuals
    who classify themselves as secular anti-Zionist Jews, and consider
    themselves to be the "independent" Jewish voices, and as thus, the
    avant-garde of "the Pro-Palestinian movement."

    Following what can only be classified as a unique international event
    of major media importance, and perhaps also of a certain historical
    significance, they are protesting and stomping their feet in anger
    at the intervention of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on a
    stage shared by the general secretary of the UN, the leader of the
    Arab League and the president of Israel.

    These unhappy critics are in a few marginal sites and tiny discussion
    groups to practically take up the cause of the American Jewish
    Committee in criticising Erdogan. The interesting and very positive
    fact that Erdogan would not allow the stream of lies uttered by
    Shimon Peres to go unchallenged in the World Economic Forum (Davos)
    Conference on Gaza seems to have eluded them all. They hardly seem to
    notice that Turkish President Erdogan obviously had come prepared for
    the sort of arguments he would be hearing, the kind of justifications
    that Israel gives for its killing sprees, as he took papers from his
    folder and read off of a sheet, (or tried hard to before the moderator
    attempted to stifle the Prime Minister and whisk the waiting public
    to their dinner) three quotes: the first, from the Jewish Torah,
    the second, from Gilad Atzmon and the third from Avi Shlaim.

    Obviously, the Torah is quite authoritative, and even if some atheist
    Jews don't mind that God, someone they claim does not exist, is being
    quoted, what counts is the message, after all. They have decided that
    Erdogan did something terrible in quoting Gilad Atzmon. What is their
    problem with the message or the messenger?

    First of all, the message: It stated pretty much the facts that
    everyone who claims they are for the Palestinians should know by
    now: "Israel's barbarity exceeds ordinary cruelty." If anyone is
    ready to state that Israel used anything less than the most crude
    disproportionate force, may they speak now or forever hope for "peace."

    It is also surprising that rather than state what Erdogan did "right,"
    they are bringing up Kurds, Armenia and other atrocious aspects
    of Turkish affairs, past or present. This is true of the attacks on
    Erdogan in the Zionist media right now, and it's being echoed by those
    who for a long time have been claiming they are the forefront of the

    movement, even without the credentials for it, unless their being
    Jewish so they can add their name to an appeal is the dubious
    credential. It does seem odd that while the discourse is Palestine,
    they are very happy to drag it to anti-Semitism, which obviously
    did not appear at all in what they are trying to destroy, or to
    geo-political arenas far from Israel and Palestine. There is no
    difference between the Zionist campaign and the anti-Zionist Jewish
    campaign. Both are to decide what the parameters of discourse are
    and to destroy the messenger, while making the issue of how Jews feel
    about themselves and how they think the world should speak about them
    the issue.

    The messenger: Erdogan is being scoffed at for his belonging to an
    Islamist party. Well, why should anyone be surprised that this is a
    deadly sin for Jews who are Zionists and anti-Zionists alike? It is
    as if it automatically means a totalitarian religious regime that is
    the enemy, and thus, the conditional support or the open criticism of
    Hamas and Hezbollah. Whether or not that is the case of Turkey, one
    has only to go there to find out. Women there are actually prohibited
    from wearing hijab (how fundamentalist is that?) in public offices,
    to cite but one example of the secular character of this state. Oh, the
    other problem, that he's bourgeois. Well, it seems that the only ones
    acceptable are ones that are just like them, secular20Marxists. Or
    secular liberals. Or Jewish Atheists. Or secular Jewish liberals
    . . . well, you get the picture.

    Well, they wonder, how could Erdogan have gotten such an "obscure"
    writer to fall into his folder and be carried from Ankara to Davos and
    directly to the stage? The critics maybe don't know that papers by
    Gilad Atzmon are widely circulated, and not only in the alternative
    media, but they have actually entered the public discourse through
    the front door. One of his recent papers was read aloud in full
    on SkyTurk. Walking around Florence, today we found his papers in
    Italian stuck under windscreen wipers; turn on your radio and you
    are hearing him interviewed about Gaza. I suppose it is great to be
    published in Socialist Unity, but if the argument used is that Atzmon
    is fringe, margin, obscure, well, that argument once and for all has
    bit the dust. It is not out of a sense of pride, and we admit, it is
    indeed a matter of pride to hear your words or words of your friends
    and allies used to tear down the shameful wall of lies by Peres,
    while he can just sit and take it. It feels incredibly good. It is
    enabling. If we can do it, not financed by anyone or doing anyone's
    business, everyone's voice can be heard. As a matter of fact, Erdogan
    made a lot of people happy. Almost across the board, Palestinians and
    Turks admired his bravery and determination.=2 0When he returned home,
    he was welcomed "as a world leader." Yet, some will try to undermine
    that by calling it demagogy, with Turkey nearing elections.

    Let's stop to think for a moment. If it is an electoral tactic to be
    as bloodthirsty as possible to win votes in Israel, and expressing
    the humanitarian cries for a beleaguered people in Turkey is the
    "winning choice," which country would you rather live in?

    And if it is indeed so that the people as a whole believe that Israel
    is killing and killing in a way that exceeds anything necessary,
    then the discourse of Atzmon is by no means marginal or fringe, it
    is at the heart of the discourse. No one has to bombard people with
    information or letters or campaigns to know how to call things as
    they see them. They don't need this Jewish organisation or that one
    to tell them who to listen to and how to think, cornering them into
    some kind of bizarre admission that identifying with these words is in
    some way damaging to Jews and anti-Semitic and some of these movement
    "leaders" will say, damaging to the movement or cause. In fact, the
    conclusion to draw is that these writings must be touching nerves,
    touching the deepest feelings of humanitarian concern and not ones
    of political or personal expediency. The diffusion of these writings
    has been by spontaneous proliferation, there is no press office or
    political group lobbying, there's just a person at his own computer
    and the spread of information from there.

    There is a rottenness of the "movement" if it does not recognise
    when the moment to put aside their personal qualms or conflicts with
    Atzmon and accept that something magnificent has happened, and the
    humanitarians of the world feel it and know it. Persisting in the
    campaign to silence Atzmon now would not only be less effective
    than it was before, but it drops down the final mask, that these
    people operate as crypto Zionists. Their agenda and the agenda of
    the American Jewish Committee is one and the same.

    Mary Rizzo is an art restorer, translator and writer living in
    Italy. She is a co-founder of Palestine Think Tank. She also
    contributes as a translator to www.tlaxcala.es.
Working...
X