Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Result Of The Expertise Presented At The Ad-Hoc Committee

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Result Of The Expertise Presented At The Ad-Hoc Committee

    RESULT OF THE EXPERTISE PRESENTED AT THE AD-HOC COMMITTEE

    National Assembly of RA
    Feb 2 2009
    Armenia

    The Ad-hoc Inquiry Committee into the Events Occurred on 1-2 March 2008
    in Yerevan and Their Reasons of the National Assembly at its sitting
    on January 23 touched upon the results of the technical experise on
    the special means Cheryomukha - 7.

    Meanwhile Mr Samvel Nikoyan, Ad-hoc committee chairman, passed the
    data provided by RA Special Examination Service to those present on
    the criminal case of March 1. According to that certificate, a charge
    was proposed to 140 persons, 54 of them by Article 225 of the Criminal
    Code, 15 of them by Articles 225 and 300, 34 of them by Article 316,
    and 27 of them by Articles 176 and 177. As Mr Samvel Nikoyan said,
    the detention was changed towards 31 persons, the criminal case
    towards 26 persons was quashed or the criminal persecution was
    suspended. 90 cases were sent to the court, verdicts were made
    for 87 cases. According to these data, by RA President's decree,
    12 defendants were granted pardon, and in 12 cases the charges were
    grounded only by the evidence of the police.

    The member of the Ad-hoc committee, chairman of the New Times Party
    Mr Aram Karapetyan, who left for Moscow with a letter addressed to
    the RF Deputy Minister of Interior Affairs Mr Alexander Smirny on
    Cheryomukha - 7 technical expertise, gave details about the visit.

    The answer of the technical expertise was sent not to Mr Samvel
    Nikoyan, but to the prosecutor's office, who in his turn passed it to
    NA Ad-hoc Committee. According to Mr Aram Karapetyan's information,
    after his visit to RA General Prosecutor's Office, as well as the visit
    to the representatives of police to Moscow with the same problem by
    which he explained the results of the expertise to the Prosecutor's
    Office, but not the circumstance of providing to the committee.

    Mr Samvel Nikoyan read the document of the Prosecutor's Office
    received from Special Technique and Communication research-production
    association of the Interior Affairs of the Russian Federation,
    where it said in particular that the bullets of Cheryomukha - 7 and
    Cheryomukha - 7M were valid for use maximum five years.

    It is supposed from the interpellations of the Prosecutor's Office
    that the weapons were of 1986 and 1989 production: after passing the
    term the technical description of these means, according to Russian
    experts, is changed, military features are reduced and they cannot
    harm human's life and health. Instead it is prohibited to shoot
    immediately a man. The NA Ad-hoc Committee also was interested in
    possibility of identifying Cheryomukha - 7 gas grenades with the
    shot weapons. In response, it was written that the institute does
    not do ballistic expertise, and it was proposed to address to another
    expertise-criminal center of the Ministry of Interior of the Russian
    Federation. At the sitting the committee decided to address the RA
    Prosecutor's Office and Special Examination Service for addressing
    the above-mentioned structure to carry out expertise of identification.

    The deputies attending the sitting expressed concern for deterioration
    of the health state of their colleagues Mr Hakob Hakobyan and
    Mr Sasun Mikayelyan and proposed to apply to relevant bodies for
    providing medical investigation. The Human Rights Defender Mr Armen
    Harutyunyan who was attending the sitting said that he hadn't received
    an official answer to his application addressed to Minister of Justice
    on this problem.

    The possibility of cooperation with the fact-finding group was also
    discussed at the sitting, as well as the issue of participation in the
    process of amendment of some articles in the Criminal Code. Mr Samvel
    Nikoyan said that he was going to propose to extend the works of the
    committee till the end of the activity of the fact-finding group.
Working...
X