Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US Report On Human Rights In Armenia "Biased" - Ruling Party MP

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • US Report On Human Rights In Armenia "Biased" - Ruling Party MP

    US REPORT ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN ARMENIA "BIASED" - RULING PARTY MP

    Aravot
    Feb 28 2009
    Armenia

    MP Eduard Sharmazanov of the ruling Republican Party of Armenia has
    described the criticism of the US State Department 2008 Human Rights
    Report: Armenia as "subjective and one-sided". Sharmazanov objected to
    a provision in the report, which said that the Armenian government
    "did not let citizens to freely exercise their right to change
    the government", saying that elections are a way for changing the
    government in Armenia and that Serzh Sargsyan was elected president
    by the majority of votes in an election that "complied with all
    accepted international standards". The following is the text of
    Margarit Yesayan's report by Aravot daily newspaper on 28 February
    headlined "'Subjective and one-sided,' this the way the spokesman
    for the Republican Party of Armenia, Eduard Sharmazanov, describes
    the US State Department's annual report"

    Under the US State Department's 2008 Human Rights Report - the
    situation in Armenia has essentially aggravated over the past year, the
    authorities and their representatives numerously violated human rights.

    According to assessments of Americans, corruption remains to be
    a serious problem in the judiciary and legal systems, cases of
    human rights violations were recorded; the conditions in prisons
    are bad; suspects are intimidated; violence against convicts
    continues. Representatives of the authorities do not accept these
    strict evaluations of the Department of State's report.

    MP Eduard Sharmazanov, the spokesman for the [ruling] Republican
    Party of Armenia, simply announced that that the State Department's
    evaluations are subjective and wide of the mark. The MP told Aravot:
    "Agreeing that there are problems in different spheres in Armenia,
    including in the sphere of human rights and others, however, I assess
    the State Department's latest annual report biased and one-sided."

    Asked what arguments he has to prove the opposite, Mr Sharmazanov
    said: "The report says that 'the authorities did not let citizens to
    freely practise their right to change the government'. I must inform
    our American colleagues that they forgot very soon that our people,
    the public changes the authorities via elections and as a result of
    elections. Our election complied with all accepted international
    standards, the then prime minister, Serzh Sargsyan , was elected
    president by the majority of popular vote in the election; so in what
    way apart from this should our citizens carry out their rights? I
    would also like to remind that numerous ballot boxes were opened after
    the election upon demands of the opposition representatives in their
    presence, and Ter-Petrosyan's votes did not grow as a result. The
    report also says that policemen beat citizens, but there is no mention
    of beatings of policemen. It is said that there was a revenge on the
    part of the authorities, but according to an unclear logic, the State
    Department turns a blind eye to fundamental principle of democracy -
    Ter-Petrosyan's steps to reject pluralism. I would like to remind
    that he was rejecting the calls by the authorities for tolerance for
    months - continuing to tend to revenge.

    We reminded Sharmazanov that the State Department's report spoke
    quite a lot about non-free state of mass media, it says that the
    equality was not ensured in the press and TV, the non-governmental
    media outlets were silenced during the [1-20 March 2008] state of
    emergency, and so on.

    Sharmazanov opposed this approach, saying: "I would like to advise
    them to once again objectively observe the Armenian press and TV of
    that time and see that there is no place for more criticism; what
    other way and how much one should criticize what was not done?; which
    figures did not receive an opportunity to speak? I would like to say
    also that our partners, who prepared the report contradict their own
    previous evaluations. In particular, during the meeting with President
    Serzh Sargsyan [former] US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said
    that Armenia is on the route of progress in democratic reforms,
    probably taking into consideration the circumstance that starting
    from the first day of President Serzh Sargsyan's rule the political
    will aimed both at carrying out legislative reforms in the TV and
    radio sphere and at solving issues of comprehensive disclosure of
    the 1 March and many other issues was apparent.
Working...
X