Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Case on part of defendant on "case of 7" S Haroutiunian suspended

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Case on part of defendant on "case of 7" S Haroutiunian suspended

    Case on part of defendant on "case of seven" Shant Haroutiunian
    suspended

    http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=101 2817

    YEREVAN, MARCH 9, NOYAN TAPAN. Yerevan Kentron and Nork-Marash first
    instance court presided over by judge Mnatsakan Martirosian on March 9
    suspended the case on the part of defendant on the "case of the seven"
    Shant Haroutiunian until he recovers. According to the court decision,
    the examination on the part of the other 6 defendants should continue.

    The note received the same day from the Vardashen penitentiary
    institution, according to which Shant Haroutiunian has been behaving
    aggressively since March 5 was publicized at the court. He refused to
    eat, to be examined by a doctor, to meet RA Ombudsman Armen
    Haroutiunian, who had come to see him, which, according to penitentiary
    department's psychiatrist, can be due to his having a psychical
    disorder. A little later defendant on the case, former Foreign Minister
    Alexander Arzumanian stated that S. Haroutiunian wanted to be present
    at the court sitting, but he was not permitted, though he was at the
    court building. The court in no way responded to the statement.

    At the same time the court on its own initiative made a decision to
    send S. Haroutiunian for a forensic-psychiatrical examination to find
    out whether he is ill, it yes, what disease he suffers from and how
    long, whether he is of sound mind, whether he was of sound mind when
    committing the crime he is accused of, whether he needs compulsory
    treatment or not, whether he is able to take part in the trial. The
    defence side protested against the decision to suspend the case on the
    part of the defendant, as a case can be suspended on the above
    mentioned basis in case of a mental and other grave disease, and as to
    S. Haroutiunian, there is no proof of his being ill yet. The defence
    side also expressed discontent saying that it is the court that decided
    the scope of questions to be asked to the experts, thus depriving the
    prosecutor and defence sides of the possibility to ask questions to
    experts.

    The court examined and turned down the petition of self-rejection
    addressed to the judge by Sargis Kloyan, the legal successor of the
    aggrieved, as according to him, the judge deprived S. Kloyan of the
    right to receive legal aid and the bailiffs did not permit his
    representative to enter the court hall. With the motivation of being
    ungrounded the judge also turned down lawyer Stepan Voskanian's
    petition, according to which the court gave no estimation to the fact
    of defendant Grigor Voskerchian's torture at the Nubarashen
    penitentiary institution and thus concealed the crime. The prosecutor
    side considers that the court is not a competent body in that issue,
    and the competent bodies have given their estimations, and the
    examination on the fact is underway.

    The court again used a judicial sanction for treating the court with
    disregard, and defendants Alexander Arzumanian, Sasun Mikayelian,
    Myasnik Malkhasian, Hakob Hakobian, and Suren Sirunian were sent away
    from the court hall for 10 days.
Working...
X