Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Azerbaijan needs a different army

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Azerbaijan needs a different army

    Agency WPS
    DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
    January 12, 2005, Wednesday

    AZERBAIJAN NEEDS A DIFFERENT ARMY

    SOURCE: Voyenno-Promyshlenny Kuryer, No. 50, December 29, 2004 -
    January 11, 2005, p. 2

    by Jasur Mamedov

    Azerbaijan's participation in NATO's Partnership for Peace Program
    necessitates launching a military reform in the republican army. Baku
    does not have other options because this is the essence of
    integration into the alliance. What's the essence of the conception
    of modernization of the republican Armed Forces? What obstacles
    hinder the reform? Major-General Tadzheddin Mekhtiyev, a
    representative of the Center of military science in the Defense
    Ministry and former defense minister, answers the newspaper's
    questions.

    Question: The republican Army was established only 13 years ago...

    Answer: Yes, and it has achieved substantial successes over these 13
    years. At present the republic has an efficient army. However, we
    have to do a lot. First and foremost, we must improve the material
    and technical basis of the Armed Forces. In addition, its fighting
    efficiency is linked with the stability in the republic. (...)

    I think that we could have achieved successes that are more
    substantial over the past 13 years. However, we need to take in
    consideration some exterior aspects of the problem. Some countries
    such as Armenia do not want Azerbaijan to create a strong army
    because this is the main factor, which can make Armenia start
    constructive negotiations. Armenia and its defenders know that a
    strong army and liberation of occupied territories mean the same.

    Question: What did you have to do over the past years?

    Answer: In my opinion, we should have created a professional army
    after we concluded the ceasefire agreement in 1994. I think that
    contract military service is the future of our army. (...) Some moves
    have been made in this direction. As far as I know, commanders of
    tanks and infantry fighting vehicles are contract ensigns. However,
    we do not have the necessary laws for creating a professional army.

    Question: Specialists say that this would be a heavy burden for
    Azerbaijan's military budget...

    Question: I agree, expenses on the maintenance of the army must
    increase. It should be noted that the 2005 military budget will
    increase. However, I think that the growth must be substantial, at
    least 100%. (...)

    There are rumors that we cannot afford to create a contract army.
    However, we do not intend to reform all units at once. We could start
    with one brigade. Of course, we will have to make amendments to the
    system of operational control over the unit and arm it with
    up-to-date weapons and military hardware. In the meantime, we need
    laws to do this.

    In my opinion, a contract brigade can be created within six months.
    It must consist of the most experienced officers and ensigns.
    Privates and sergeants must be selected among former draftees. We
    could calculate expenses on the maintenance of this unit and make
    decisions regarding other units.

    The new brigade must become the main unit of the Army and be used in
    the most important operations.

    (...) The contract brigade must be equipped with the most up-to-date
    mortars, automatic rifles, bazookas, sniper rifles, machine-guns,
    light tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel
    carriers. The most important thing is that all officers and ensigns
    of the brigade must have the most up-to-date communication systems.
    The unit must also use radio-technical, engineering and artillery
    reconnaissance systems. In addition, it needs mobile vehicles for
    transporting injured servicemen.

    Question: Does the legislation in force make it possible to realize
    your proposals? What do you need to change?

    Answer: (...)I think that amendments must affect the laws on military
    service, the status of servicemen and servicemen's pensions. At
    present, the family of a killed serviceman receives a lump sum equal
    to five monthly wages. In my opinion, this sum must increase to the
    Soviet levels (180 months wages). Invalids must receive lump sums
    equal to 100 months wages (at present, five months wages). Servicemen
    who have served for 15 years receive three months wages when they
    resign. (...)

    Money allowances must be revised. They must be increased by 200% to
    300%. Servicemen's children must not pay for higher education.
    Dismissed officers must be placed to new jobs within three months.
    Medical services for servicemen and their families must be free of
    charge. Dismissed officers must have the right to spend vacations
    abroad once a year.

    Question: Have these proposals been submitted to the parliament of
    Azerbaijan?

    Answer: We have done this but we cannot influence the process of
    passing these proposals. In my opinion, if a group of advisors
    consisting of skilled officers and generals worked in the parliament
    we would be able to pass these laws. General Vladimir Timoshenko is
    the only professional serviceman in the parliament. It is no
    coincidence that the parliament has passed bills, which have
    decreased the significance of military service. The advisors would
    have defended servicemen's interests.

    Translated by Alexander Dubovoi
Working...
X