Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BAKU: Robert L. Livingston: "907" Amendment Needs To Be Abolished -

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BAKU: Robert L. Livingston: "907" Amendment Needs To Be Abolished -

    ROBERT L. LIVINGSTON: "907" AMENDMENT NEEDS TO BE ABOLISHED - EXCLUSIVE

    APA
    May 19 2009
    Azerbaijan

    Washington. Zaur Hasanov - APA. Former Speaker-designate of the
    U.S. House of Representatives Robert L. Livingston gives an interview
    to APA US bureau

    Profile. Robert Livingston was the member of the House of
    Representatives in 1977-1999. In 1998 in capacity of chairman of the
    Appropriations Committee Livingston initiated to eliminate Section 907
    of the Freedom Support Act and managed its abolition on the level of
    the committee. Full abolition of the section was impossible in the
    voting held in the House of Representatives due to the pressure of
    the Armenian lobby.

    - Both President Obama and Secretary of State Hilary Clinton have
    stated that they will foster the process of final settlement of the
    Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. How can it help the final settlement of
    Nagorno-Karabakh conflict?

    - We have to hope that this is going to be true. In the next few
    weeks, the President Mubarak of Egypt is coming to the United
    States and President Obama is going to Egypt to address the entire
    Muslim world. It appears to me that President Obama has a very clear
    understanding of issues which affect the whole region, all the way
    through to the Caspian. If that is true, then he has to know that
    the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is a key ingredient
    to resolving the problems of the area. Turkey has been talking to
    Armenia these days and Prime Minister Ardogan just last week showed
    Azerbaijan that he is not going to resolve the border issue with
    Armenia without resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh issue as well. It is
    important for Europe because of the pipelines. It is important for
    the entire world because of troubled areas such as Iran and elsewhere.

    With President Obama going to Egypt to address the Muslim world, his
    address is going to be a comprehensive one and the Nagorno-Karabakh
    conflict is going to be a very key component.

    - In 1998, your initiated to abolish "907" amendment to "The Freedom
    Support Act" almost succeeded in the House. Do you think will it be
    possible to repeal it with the Democrats controlling the Congress?

    - It is an unfair provision. That provision was placed on the books
    back in 1992 by John Kerry in the middle of the night when nobody was
    looking and nobody thought anything about it. There is no provision of
    this kind like that aimed at any other friend of the United States or
    any enemy of the United States. It is the only provision of its sort
    in our foreign policy and it needs to be abolished. Almost everybody
    in our Defense Department says it should be abolished, some people
    in our State Department say that it should be abolished. But getting
    the political will of the majority of Congress in both Houses takes
    work. With the Armenian Diaspora constantly working against it,
    it is an uphill battle. But it is possible.

    - Don't you think that with John Kerry, a chairman of the powerful
    foreign affairs committee, it will be difficult to do?

    - Senator John Kerry has a different hat to wear these days. He is
    Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and has to be more
    responsible. His responsibility is to do what is in the best interest
    of the United States. Eliminating 907 is not only in the best interest
    of Azerbaijan but it is in the best interest of the United States.

    - Some experts in Washington believe that if Turkey opens its borders
    with Armenia without significant progress on Nagorno-Karabakh issue,
    it still will bring an improved environment to the region. Do you
    agree with this approach?

    - Not really. Once you open the border then people who are
    occupying the territory will not likely give it up. It needs to be
    a comprehensive resolution. Otherwise the people who have gained
    the ground will refuse to move and you will continue to have a
    struggle. Then it will be up to the individuals to fight for their
    property back and once the conflicts starts you can not get rid of
    it. So I think we need a comprehensive settlement.
Working...
X