Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey, Armenia: A Major Thaw In the Long Freeze

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turkey, Armenia: A Major Thaw In the Long Freeze

    Turkey, Armenia: A Major Thaw In the Long Freeze

    Stratfor.com (Strategic Forecasting Inc.)
    Feb 01, 2005

    Summary

    Armenia and Turkey have made stunning announcements that indicate a
    melting in the long diplomatic freeze between them. Such unprecedented
    progress suggests an end to the stalemate is on the horizon, if still
    off in the distance. With Turkey's drive for EU membership providing
    the impetus, both governments now have far more to gain from
    normalizing relations than they stand to lose by angering nationalist
    opponents to those relations.

    Analysis

    Mustafa Safran, chairman of the Turkish Education Ministry's
    commission on textbooks, says the country's newest history textbooks
    will include references to the controversial Armenian "genocide."
    Armenia has long insisted that Turkey acknowledge that it committed
    genocide against more than 1 million Armenians in 1915, a charge
    Turkey has denied -- so vehemently, in fact, that the topic has been
    taboo until recently. Textbooks, however, will now include both
    Armenian and Turkish version of the events so students can make up
    their own minds, Safran said.

    This essentially amounts to an astounding change in Turkish foreign
    policy and an enormous concession to Armenia. Diplomatic relations
    between the two have been frozen since, in the wake of Armenian
    independence from the Soviet Union, Turkey closed its border with
    Armenia -- this was done in a show of support for its Turkic brethren
    in Azerbaijan over Yerevan's role in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
    that began in 1988.

    Complementing Safran's surprise announcement was a statement the same
    day, Jan. 28, from Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian on a
    Turkish radio station. Oskanian said Armenia no longer considers
    Turkish acknowledgement that the 1915 events constituted genocide as a
    precondition for normalized relations. Oskanian added that Armenia
    would renounce all claims to territory now within Turkish borders and
    that the re-opening of borders between the two countries would be
    enough to re-establish normal ties. These two announcements are
    tantamount to an earthquake in the old foundation of relations between
    these two longtime adversaries, and their simultaneous presentation
    likely signals coordination -- revealing that a serious push is on.

    It is probably no coincidence that these announcements came so soon
    after Turkey received its invitation to begin negotiations on
    membership to the European Union. The two sides have been holding
    high-level secret meetings for several years, sources close to the
    talks say, to avoid having nationalists on either side scuttle
    negotiations before they can make progress. Turkey's EU drive likely
    has given those negotiations a strong shove forward.

    According to EU membership requirements, Ankara need not restore
    relations with Yerevan in order to join. Given that some EU members
    are likely to try to delay Turkey's accession as long as possible,
    Turkey will need to be squeaky-clean in order to get in, and that
    makes normal relations with Armenia a necessity. If the road to
    Brussels goes through Yerevan, then Ankara has all the motivation it
    needs to normalize relations.

    For its part, Armenia also announced recently that it hopes to join
    the Union in the future. If it is sincere, this makes peace with a
    prospective member imperative for Yerevan as well, not to mention the
    resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Hopes of EU membership
    are even further off for Armenia than for Turkey, but Armenia has
    convincing reasons to bury the hatchet.

    In spite of their closed borders, trade between Turkey and Armenia
    totaled $125 million in 2004, and the Armenian government believes
    that figure would jump to $500 million almost instantaneously if the
    border were re-opened. For a country with an estimated 2004 gross
    domestic product of $3.5 billion, this is an enormous difference. That
    trade would no doubt grow further if economic ties were allowed to
    develop between the two countries, to the benefit of both sides.

    More significantly for Armenia, an open door to Turkey would finally
    release it from the economic prison it has been in since its borders
    with Turkey and Azerbaijan were slammed shut. With the borders closed,
    Yerevan has been forced to subsist on Georgia's dilapidated
    infrastructure to get goods to and from the West, which makes for a
    significantly slower, and more expensive, trip than if it could go
    through Turkey. Also, with access to Turkey, goods would pass through
    a large market along the way to the West.

    The political ramifications for Armenia are equally significant as the
    economic ones, if not more so. An open border with Turkey would reduce
    Armenia's reliance on Russia for either its political or economic
    well-being. Furthermore, Armenia would find less of a need for close
    relations with Iran -- its economic lifeline to the south and no
    friend to Ankara -- if it had more stable ties to the West. Better
    relations with Turkey also likely would give a push to negotiations
    with Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh. In short, normal diplomatic and
    trade relations with Turkey would reshape Armenia's strategic position
    and offer it a political independence that it has not had for a very
    long time.

    Potential stumbling blocks, however, remain. The Turkish military has
    been the guardian of Turkish national interests since the days of
    Ataturk and can always bring the works to a grinding halt. The
    military high command has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness to
    allow the elected government to take steps to move the country toward
    EU membership, which is in keeping with Ataturk's Western-oriented
    philosophy. If, however, it perceives an unnecessary step or
    concession, such as one on Nagorno-Karabakh, the military could
    quickly make its presence felt again. As long as Turkish Prime
    Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan does only what is necessary for EU
    membership, which includes normal relations with Armenia, the military
    should stay on the sidelines.

    On the Armenian side, the biggest stumbling block to Turkish-Armenian
    rapprochement at this point appears to lie outside the two countries.
    The Armenian lobbies in the United States and France are highly
    successful and influential. They exercise their influence not only
    through their control of significant remittances to Armenia, on which
    the country depends economically, but also through their influence on
    the governments of their respective countries. The sources say the
    Armenian diasporas in the United States and France continue to be
    vehemently opposed to a deal with Turkey that does not include
    recognition of the events of 1915 as genocide.

    These diasporas played a decisive role in the rise to power of
    nationalist Armenian President Robert Kocharian in 1998 after his
    predecessor, Levon Ter-Petrosian, began talking to Ankara. Since they
    do not have the political and economic interests that the residents of
    Turkey and Armenia have, these expatriates tend to act strictly on
    emotional grounds and have little interest in the practical benefits
    of normalized relations.

    It comes as no surprise, then, that the day after Oskanian's Jan. 28
    statement, French Foreign Minister Michel Barnier demanded that Turkey
    recognize the genocide of 1915 -- a comment the Turks will never take
    sitting down. Sympathy in France tends to be in Armenia's favor, but
    it is a virtual certainty that phone calls from influential Armenians
    -- in a tizzy about Yerevan's overtures -- played a role in eliciting
    such a high-level response so soon. The fact, however, that Kocharian
    is so publicly stepping out on a limb and risking the wrath of
    important supporters abroad indicates there is enough political will
    at home for him to absorb criticism from his supporters abroad.

    Although bumps on the road are inevitable, opponents to normalized
    relations on either side likely are fighting a losing battle. The
    prospect of EU membership has altered the calculations of the
    Turkish-Armenian dispute, and the power politics now point toward a
    normalization of relations. In October, Turkey will officially begin
    its negotiations to enter the EU, and the disputes with both Cyprus
    and Armenia are destined to be resolved if Turkey is sincere in its
    desire to join. With renewed Turkish willingness to negotiate, and
    great benefits awaiting Armenia, the incentive to overcome any
    obstacles is far greater now than it has been in the past, and that
    makes normalized relations a strong possibility in the future.


    (Stratfor: Predictive, Insightful, Global Intelligence)
Working...
X