Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Case Of Seven" At Appeals Court

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • "Case Of Seven" At Appeals Court

    "CASE OF SEVEN" AT APPEALS COURT

    A1+
    06:55 pm | July 31, 2009 | Politics

    Today the prisoners charged with the "Case of Seven" expressed
    their appeals/complaints at different halls of the Appeals Court at
    different hours.

    The advocates of Sasun Mikayelyan, Myasnik Malkhasyan, Alexander
    Arzumanyan, Suren Sirunyan and Hakob Hakobyan were demanding from
    the judges to reverse the judgments of the first instance courts and
    reach the verdict of "not guilty".

    Hovik Arsenyan, advocate of MP Myasnik Malkhasyan who is charged with
    organizing mass disturbances and was released by amnesty, said that
    there was no evidence in the criminal case to show that he was guilty.

    "These trials were politically-oriented from the start," said Myasnik
    Malkhasyan, adding that he would not like to take responsibility for
    things that he had not done. According to him, he was first arrested
    for using drugs and then that was denied.

    Another advocate Vaghinak Gevorgyan also defended MP Sasun Mikayelyan,
    who was sentenced to 8 years in prison by the first instance court
    of the Kotayk region.

    In the beginning of the trial, Hovik Arsenyan presented a challenge
    petition to prosecutor Aram Amirzadyan, mentioning that he also helped
    make sure that the other witness, Tatul Karapetyan, did not testify
    in court and claim his testimony during the preliminary inquiry.

    The prosecutor considered the petition groundless and the trio of
    judges, including Armen Danielyan, Mher Arghamanyan and Melik Sargsyan,
    rejected the petition after coming out of the consultations room.

    Then advocate Vaghinak Gevorgyan presented a challenge petition to
    judges Mher Arghamanyan and Armen Danielyan and explained that the
    reason for the petition was that the two judges had examined many
    cases by Part 1, Article 225 of the Criminal Code in 2008 and 2009
    and acknowledged him guilty, meaning that the two judges were biased
    and that it will be expressed in this case as well.

    The prosecutor considered the petition groundless and the trio of
    judges rejected it too.

    Sasun Mikayelyan was acknowledged builty based on Part 2, Article
    235 and Part 1, Article 225 and was sentenced to 8 years in prison.

    The judges must reach verdicts for the cases of Alexander Arzumanyan,
    Suren Sirunyan and Hakob Hakobyan by the end of the working day. They
    were acknowledged guilty by Part 1, Article 225 and were released
    by amnesty.

    There were many people gathered in front of the courtroom today,
    including opposition activists with photos of former political
    prisoneres and the demand to declare them not guilty.
Working...
X