Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who Are Erdogan's Ancsesors?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Who Are Erdogan's Ancsesors?

    WHO ARE ERDOGAN'S ANCSESORS?

    Lragir.am
    14/12/09

    A noted French author said truly that, "We are all products of our
    childhoods". In order to correctly understand any politician, or even
    any man, it is necessary to understand where he or she comes from.

    This is even more important after Erdogan stated, "My ancestors have
    never committed genocide!".

    Let us first turn to Erdogan's forebears. Recep Tayyip Erdogan has
    Kartvelian ancestry, more specifically, his ancestors were ethnic Laz.

    He declared this himself on the 12th of August, 2004, during a visit
    to Batumi. The grandfather of the current Prime Minister of Turkey was
    likewise called Recep; he lived in Bagat, near Batumi, up to 1878,
    and his father, in turn, was a local imam for many years. After
    the war of 1877-78, when Batumi became part of the Russian Empire,
    this Recep emigrated to the city of Rize,[1] where he was known as
    "Bagatlı Recep". He died during the First World War, in 1916, while
    fighting against Russian forces advancing towards Rize.

    Although Recep Tayyip was born in Istanbul (on the 26th of February,
    1954), he did, in fact, spend most of his childhood - up to the age
    of thirteen - in Rize, the city of his ancestors. His father, Ahmed,
    worked in the coast guard, while his mother, Tenzile, was a homemaker,
    raising five children. In 1967, the Erdogan family moved to Istanbul
    once again, where Recep graduated from a religious school - Ä°mam
    Hatip Lisesi - in 1973. Even while at school, at the age of sixteen,
    he began to deliver sermons. Perhaps Recep Tayyip would have turned
    out to be an imam like his great-grandfather, if religion did not
    gradually take up a greater role in Turkish politics.

    Recep Erdogan's wife, Emine Erdogan, is from the city of Siirt
    (Sgherd in Armenian), ethnically Arab. They have four children.

    And now, let us turn to the ancestors' participation in the Armenian
    Genocide.

    Nobody is personally accusing the forbears of Erdogan for carrying
    out the Armenian Genocide. Moreover, nobody is accusing the present
    generation of the Turkish people for the Armenian Genocide either.

    Nevertheless, although current Turks are not guilty of their ancestors'
    crimes, they are yet responsible for them, just as today's Germans,
    while free of blame with regards to the crimes of the Nazis, bear
    their responsibility and continue up to the present to silently
    and patiently carry that heavy burden. And that responsibility is
    manifested not only by the outright condemnation of the criminal act
    itself, but also by the hundreds of billions in aid that have been
    granted and that continue to be granted to Israel.

    The current Republic of Turkey is not only the direct legal continuity
    of the Ottoman Empire, but it continues to also maintain an umbilical
    cord of political and ideological connections with those in power in
    the empire's last days, the Young Turks. It is a plain fact that all
    the founders of the Republic of Turkey - including Mustafa Kemal -
    were members of the Ittihad ve Terraki party ("Union and Progress")
    which had orchestrated the Armenian Genocide. For that reason, many
    specialists include the Young Turks in their chronologies of the
    early years of the republic, from 1908-1950 (as "The Young Turk era
    in Turkish history").

    Accordingly, even if Erdogan's forebears were, say, not directly
    involved in the Armenian Genocide, indubitably however, Erdogan's
    political forebears most certainly perpetrated the first genocide of
    the twentieth century.

    And so, as long as the Turkish people do not condemn the Armenian
    Genocide and continue to enjoy the fruits of this crime, they are
    at the very least accomplice to the first genocide of the twentieth
    century. Ultimately, criminals are not merely the ones who carry out
    the crime, but also those on the side of the crime, and those who
    acquire its spoils.

    Ara Papian Head, "Modus Vivendi" Centre 12 December 2009
Working...
X