Tweet
TURKEY DENIES HISTORY
Christopher Hitchens
History News Network
April 5 2010
April is the cruelest month for the people of Armenia, who every year
at this season have to suffer a continuing tragedy and a humiliation.
The tragedy is that of commemorating the huge number of their ancestors
who were exterminated by the Ottoman Muslim caliphate in a campaign of
state-planned mass murder that began in April 1915. The humiliation
is of hearing, year after year, that the Turkish authorities simply
deny that these appalling events ever occurred or that the killings
constituted "genocide."
In a technical and pedantic sense, the word genocide does not, in
fact, apply, since it only entered our vocabulary in 1943. (It was
coined by a scholar named Raphael Lemkin, who for rather self-evident
reasons in that even more awful year wanted a legal term for the
intersection between racism and bloodlust and saw Armenia as the
precedent for what was then happening in Poland.) I still rather
prefer the phrase used by America's then-ambassador to Turkey,
Henry Morgenthau. Reporting to Washington about what his consular
agents were telling him of the foul doings in the Ottoman provinces
of Harput and Van in particular, he employed the striking words "race
extermination." (See the imperishable book The Slaughterhouse Province
for some of the cold diplomatic dispatches of that period.) Terrible
enough in itself, Morgenthau's expression did not quite comprehend
the later erasure of all traces of Armenian life, from the destruction
of their churches and libraries and institutes to the crude altering
of official Turkish maps and schoolbooks to deny that there had ever
been an Armenia in the first place.
This year, the House foreign affairs committee in Washington and the
parliament of Sweden joined the growing number of political bodies
that have decided to call the slaughter by its right name. I quote
now from a statement in response by Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the current
prime minister of Turkey and the leader of its Islamist party:
In my country there are 170,000 Armenians. Seventy thousand of them
are citizens. We tolerate 100,000 more. So, what am I going to do
tomorrow? If necessary I will tell the 100,000: OK, time to go back
to your country. Why? They are not my citizens. I am not obliged to
keep them in my country.
This extraordinary threat was not made at some stupid rally in
a fly-blown town. It was uttered in England, on March 17, on the
Turkish-language service of the BBC. Just to be clear, then, about
the view of Turkey's chief statesman: If democratic assemblies dare
to mention the ethnic cleansing of Armenians in the 20th century,
I will personally complete that cleansing in the 21st!
Where to begin? Turkish "guest workers" are to be found in great
numbers all through the European Union, membership of which is a
declared Turkish objective. How would the world respond if a European
prime minister called for the mass deportation of all Turks? Yet
Erdogan's xenophobic demagoguery attracted precisely no condemnation
from Washington or Brussels. He probably overestimated the number of
"tolerated" economic refugees from neighboring and former Soviet
Armenia, but is it not interesting that he keeps a count in his head?
And a count of the tiny number of surviving Turkish Armenians as
well?..
http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/125231.h tml
Christopher Hitchens
History News Network
April 5 2010
April is the cruelest month for the people of Armenia, who every year
at this season have to suffer a continuing tragedy and a humiliation.
The tragedy is that of commemorating the huge number of their ancestors
who were exterminated by the Ottoman Muslim caliphate in a campaign of
state-planned mass murder that began in April 1915. The humiliation
is of hearing, year after year, that the Turkish authorities simply
deny that these appalling events ever occurred or that the killings
constituted "genocide."
In a technical and pedantic sense, the word genocide does not, in
fact, apply, since it only entered our vocabulary in 1943. (It was
coined by a scholar named Raphael Lemkin, who for rather self-evident
reasons in that even more awful year wanted a legal term for the
intersection between racism and bloodlust and saw Armenia as the
precedent for what was then happening in Poland.) I still rather
prefer the phrase used by America's then-ambassador to Turkey,
Henry Morgenthau. Reporting to Washington about what his consular
agents were telling him of the foul doings in the Ottoman provinces
of Harput and Van in particular, he employed the striking words "race
extermination." (See the imperishable book The Slaughterhouse Province
for some of the cold diplomatic dispatches of that period.) Terrible
enough in itself, Morgenthau's expression did not quite comprehend
the later erasure of all traces of Armenian life, from the destruction
of their churches and libraries and institutes to the crude altering
of official Turkish maps and schoolbooks to deny that there had ever
been an Armenia in the first place.
This year, the House foreign affairs committee in Washington and the
parliament of Sweden joined the growing number of political bodies
that have decided to call the slaughter by its right name. I quote
now from a statement in response by Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the current
prime minister of Turkey and the leader of its Islamist party:
In my country there are 170,000 Armenians. Seventy thousand of them
are citizens. We tolerate 100,000 more. So, what am I going to do
tomorrow? If necessary I will tell the 100,000: OK, time to go back
to your country. Why? They are not my citizens. I am not obliged to
keep them in my country.
This extraordinary threat was not made at some stupid rally in
a fly-blown town. It was uttered in England, on March 17, on the
Turkish-language service of the BBC. Just to be clear, then, about
the view of Turkey's chief statesman: If democratic assemblies dare
to mention the ethnic cleansing of Armenians in the 20th century,
I will personally complete that cleansing in the 21st!
Where to begin? Turkish "guest workers" are to be found in great
numbers all through the European Union, membership of which is a
declared Turkish objective. How would the world respond if a European
prime minister called for the mass deportation of all Turks? Yet
Erdogan's xenophobic demagoguery attracted precisely no condemnation
from Washington or Brussels. He probably overestimated the number of
"tolerated" economic refugees from neighboring and former Soviet
Armenia, but is it not interesting that he keeps a count in his head?
And a count of the tiny number of surviving Turkish Armenians as
well?..
http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/125231.h tml