Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fascinating Karabakh

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fascinating Karabakh

    FASCINATING KARABAKH
    HAKOB BADALYAN

    Lragir.am
    14/05/10

    Karabakh issue has become a hostage of the Armenian home political
    life, while the Armenian home political life became the hostage
    of the Karabakh issue. This mutual connection brought about an
    economic-political and socio-psychological deadlock. On the one hand,
    it is obvious that the current problems of Armenia have nothing in
    common with the Karabakh dispute. As well, the settlement of this
    conflict within the international logic and establishment of peace
    and stable situation can hardly solve Armenian home fundamental
    issues such as rigged election, economic and political monopolies,
    business and power connection.

    On the other hand, it is obvious that the Armenian home political
    situation from time to time becomes a hostage of Karabakh: "Stay
    calm, or we will lose Karabakh", "do not rally, this is the reason
    why Azerbaijan tried to attack", "you help our enemies when dwelling
    on democratic issues", and a series of other such kind of approaches
    that the power uses during the whole period of independence.

    More, oppositions during independence have also acknowledged this
    fact which, not knowing what to do, explain their "being calm" with
    the desire not to harm Karabakh. Let alone the fact that the only more
    or less change of government occurred in Armenia was again determined
    by the Karabakh issue.

    The problem is how to come out of this situation of mutual connection
    and change the public psychology explaining to it that as long as
    the stability of the current economic-political, socio-psychological
    situation is preserved, the challenges and dangers of Armenia and
    NKR will become more because the world is moving forward changing
    interests, moods and tactics.

    The public perception with regards to the NKR issue is to be changed
    making it understand that the key to the settlement of the NKR issue
    is in Armenia. If someone really wants to solve this dispute, they
    need to dwell on the Armenian home issues and their solutions: if the
    intentions and wishes to see Armenia as a regional center are sincere,
    everyone needs to stop making calculations in connection with home
    issues proceeding from the NKR issue, hoping to carry out a shift of
    government with its help: it is necessary to respect the territorial
    integrity of Karabakh: the idea that the surrender of territories in
    exchange of something is a synonym of peacefulness and pragmatism is to
    be changed, just like the opinion that the opposite means bellicosity,
    adventurousness, etc.

    The Armenian National Congress in this context is seen as the
    main oppositional force of the country which publicly assumed the
    responsibility to change the situation in the country. But this
    does not grant Congress the immunity of criticism. More, if Congress
    assumed the role of the force to change the situation in the country,
    its mistakes and shortcomings become fatal for the country.

    Consequently, the demands towards Congress become bigger. It is quite
    comprehensible that sometimes they can be dictated by political
    reasons. But it is only waste of time for Congress to make them
    self-protective measures. The example of the government is good in this
    connection: it qualifies any criticism as a result of treachery but
    doing this it appears in a ridiculous situation because the society
    in the end prefers being led by facts and arguments.

    The point is that the vocabulary of the Congress, during the last 1-1,
    5 years, is "overwhelmed" with geopolitics and geopolitical analyses
    and predictions of fatal solutions in the NKR issue. In other words,
    the Congress, which seems in 2008 to have found a way to come out of
    the circle of connection of NKR issue and the Armenian home life,
    consciously or unconsciously, returns in the same circle. This is
    the problem and not the fact that Congress is not active, decisive,
    fundamental and unable of carrying out a revolution. The main problem
    is that Congress deviated from its goal to establish a civil and legal
    society and psychology and underestimated this job to foreign policy,
    mainly, Karabakh issue.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X