Tweet
SASSOUNIAN: TURKISH PRESIDENT OF EUROPEAN COUNCIL SHOULD BE BARRED FROM ARMENIA
Harut Sassounian
Armenian Weekly
Mon, May 17 2010
Mevlut Cavusoglu, the Turkish President of PACE (Parliamentary Assembly
of the Council of Europe), offended his hosts by refusing to lay a
wreath at the Armenian Genocide Monument during his visit to Yerevan
last week.
When the Armenian media questioned him about his refusal, Cavusoglu
lied by saying that his predecessors had not done so either. Armenian
journalists corrected him by pointing out that his predecessors
had in fact visited the Genocide Monument. After getting caught,
he changed his tune and confessed that it was his personal decision
not to visit the Monument and asked that Armenians respect his wishes.
Why should Armenians respect a genocide denier and a liar? Although a
founder of the ruling Justice and Development Party and member of the
Turkish Parliament, Cavusoglu was not visiting Armenia as a Turkish
official, but as President of PACE. It is regrettable that earlier this
year Armenia's delegates to PACE were not successful in blocking his
election to the Presidency of this influential European institution.
The real issue is not Cavusoglu's ethnic background. No one should be
disqualified from any post due to his or her ethnicity. The objections
are based on his long-standing opposition to Armenian issues, including
denials of the Armenian Genocide and support for Azerbaijan in the
Artsakh conflict.
Upon learning that Cavusoglu would not visit the Genocide Memorial-a
standard protocol for all high-ranking dignitaries visiting Yerevan-the
Armenian government decided to downgrade the status of his visit from
"official" to that of a "working" one. Needless to say, this was just
a slap on the wrist, given the gravity of his offense.
Regrettably, Armenian officials did not issue a single word of
criticism or condemnation. They should have taken a harsher measure
against Cavusoglu and cancelled his trip to Yerevan. By not enforcing
the country's long established protocol, Armenian officials are simply
encouraging future visiting dignitaries not to respect the memory of
Armenian Genocide victims.
A bad precedent was already set in September 2008, when Pres. Gul was
invited to Yerevan. I wrote a column then urging Armenian authorities
to ask the Turkish President to lay a wreath at the Genocide Monument.
Unfortunately, no such request was made of Pres. Gul, and he was more
than happy to sidestep the issue!
I must commend the Armenian Revolutionary Federation for refusing to
meet with Cavusoglu during his Yerevan visit, because of his disrespect
for Armenian Genocide victims. His visit was also condemned by the
local Student Union of the Hnchag Party.
Unfortunately, officials of an opposition party met Cavusoglu in
Yerevan to pursue their own agenda, asking him-a Turk-to condemn the
Armenian government's human rights record. Meanwhile, pro-government
parties met Cavusoglu to familiarize him with Armenia's position on
major regional issues, as if he would be willing to change his views
on the Armenian Genocide, Artsakh and Armenian-Turkish relations.
Regardless of his own and his government's denialist position on the
Armenian Genocide, Cavusoglu should not be excused for not having
visited the Genocide Monument. Even Ambassadors of countries that do
not formally acknowledge the Armenian Genocide take part in the solemn
procession on April 24 and lay a wreath at the Genocide Monument.
By refusing to follow protocol, Cavusoglu not only insulted the
Armenian nation, but also violated the long-standing recognition of
the Armenian Genocide by the European Parliament.
In the end, by his words and deeds, the Turkish diplomat managed to
embarrass himself and undermine his own credibility as a political
figure unworthy of representing a prominent European institution and
its values.
To avoid similar scandals in the future, Armenian officials must
contact foreign dignitaries in advance of their planned visits and
impress upon them the importance of respecting Armenia's established
protocol on laying a wreath at the Genocide Monument. Should they
refuse, their visit should be promptly canceled. Can anyone imagine
a foreign dignitary visiting Jerusalem and refusing to lay a wreath
at the Yad Vashem memorial for Holocaust victims? He or she would
not be allowed to set foot in Israel again. The Armenian government
should take a similar stand vis-a-vis the Armenian Genocide Memorial!
At the end of his first visit to Armenia, Cavusoglu announced that
he would be back in Yerevan in October. I hope Armenian officials
do not let him into the country, unless he is prepared to respect
Armenia's established protocols for all foreign dignitaries.
If Armenian officials do not insist on applying their own rules and
regulations, foreign dignitaries would have no reason to comply!
Harut Sassounian
Armenian Weekly
Mon, May 17 2010
Mevlut Cavusoglu, the Turkish President of PACE (Parliamentary Assembly
of the Council of Europe), offended his hosts by refusing to lay a
wreath at the Armenian Genocide Monument during his visit to Yerevan
last week.
When the Armenian media questioned him about his refusal, Cavusoglu
lied by saying that his predecessors had not done so either. Armenian
journalists corrected him by pointing out that his predecessors
had in fact visited the Genocide Monument. After getting caught,
he changed his tune and confessed that it was his personal decision
not to visit the Monument and asked that Armenians respect his wishes.
Why should Armenians respect a genocide denier and a liar? Although a
founder of the ruling Justice and Development Party and member of the
Turkish Parliament, Cavusoglu was not visiting Armenia as a Turkish
official, but as President of PACE. It is regrettable that earlier this
year Armenia's delegates to PACE were not successful in blocking his
election to the Presidency of this influential European institution.
The real issue is not Cavusoglu's ethnic background. No one should be
disqualified from any post due to his or her ethnicity. The objections
are based on his long-standing opposition to Armenian issues, including
denials of the Armenian Genocide and support for Azerbaijan in the
Artsakh conflict.
Upon learning that Cavusoglu would not visit the Genocide Memorial-a
standard protocol for all high-ranking dignitaries visiting Yerevan-the
Armenian government decided to downgrade the status of his visit from
"official" to that of a "working" one. Needless to say, this was just
a slap on the wrist, given the gravity of his offense.
Regrettably, Armenian officials did not issue a single word of
criticism or condemnation. They should have taken a harsher measure
against Cavusoglu and cancelled his trip to Yerevan. By not enforcing
the country's long established protocol, Armenian officials are simply
encouraging future visiting dignitaries not to respect the memory of
Armenian Genocide victims.
A bad precedent was already set in September 2008, when Pres. Gul was
invited to Yerevan. I wrote a column then urging Armenian authorities
to ask the Turkish President to lay a wreath at the Genocide Monument.
Unfortunately, no such request was made of Pres. Gul, and he was more
than happy to sidestep the issue!
I must commend the Armenian Revolutionary Federation for refusing to
meet with Cavusoglu during his Yerevan visit, because of his disrespect
for Armenian Genocide victims. His visit was also condemned by the
local Student Union of the Hnchag Party.
Unfortunately, officials of an opposition party met Cavusoglu in
Yerevan to pursue their own agenda, asking him-a Turk-to condemn the
Armenian government's human rights record. Meanwhile, pro-government
parties met Cavusoglu to familiarize him with Armenia's position on
major regional issues, as if he would be willing to change his views
on the Armenian Genocide, Artsakh and Armenian-Turkish relations.
Regardless of his own and his government's denialist position on the
Armenian Genocide, Cavusoglu should not be excused for not having
visited the Genocide Monument. Even Ambassadors of countries that do
not formally acknowledge the Armenian Genocide take part in the solemn
procession on April 24 and lay a wreath at the Genocide Monument.
By refusing to follow protocol, Cavusoglu not only insulted the
Armenian nation, but also violated the long-standing recognition of
the Armenian Genocide by the European Parliament.
In the end, by his words and deeds, the Turkish diplomat managed to
embarrass himself and undermine his own credibility as a political
figure unworthy of representing a prominent European institution and
its values.
To avoid similar scandals in the future, Armenian officials must
contact foreign dignitaries in advance of their planned visits and
impress upon them the importance of respecting Armenia's established
protocol on laying a wreath at the Genocide Monument. Should they
refuse, their visit should be promptly canceled. Can anyone imagine
a foreign dignitary visiting Jerusalem and refusing to lay a wreath
at the Yad Vashem memorial for Holocaust victims? He or she would
not be allowed to set foot in Israel again. The Armenian government
should take a similar stand vis-a-vis the Armenian Genocide Memorial!
At the end of his first visit to Armenia, Cavusoglu announced that
he would be back in Yerevan in October. I hope Armenian officials
do not let him into the country, unless he is prepared to respect
Armenia's established protocols for all foreign dignitaries.
If Armenian officials do not insist on applying their own rules and
regulations, foreign dignitaries would have no reason to comply!