Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Edward Nalbandian:"Turkey Should Reconcile With Its Own Past"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Edward Nalbandian:"Turkey Should Reconcile With Its Own Past"

    EDWARD NALBANDIAN:"TURKEY SHOULD RECONCILE WITH ITS OWN PAST"

    Aysor
    June 15 2010
    Armenia

    In the interview given to Austrian journal the "Profil" Armenian
    Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian answered the question why it's so
    important for Armenia that Turkey accepts the expression Genocide.

    "From the very beginning of this process we have told our Turkish
    counterparts that in no way Armenia will question the fact of the
    Armenian Genocide or the importance of its international recognition.

    We see the recognition and condemnation of the first Genocide in the
    twentieth century not only as a tribute to memory of its victims,
    but also as an important tool to prevent further genocides."

    To the question whether future genocides will be prevented the RA
    minister reminded, "You probably know, that Rafael Lemkin the author
    of the term "Genocide" invoked the Armenian Genocide as an explanation
    for his wording on the crime against humanity. Although it is very
    hard for us, but we did not put the Armenian Genocide recognition by
    Turkey as a precondition for normalization of our relations. Turkey
    should reconcile with its own past to be able to build its future.

    Nelson Mandela once said. "True reconciliation does not consist in
    merely forgetting the past".

    At the same time, I have to mention that inside Turkey there are
    certain processes and movements calling for the Genocide Recognition.

    Right after we initiated the normalization process, several Turkish
    intellectuals started an internet campaign, which was called "Apology
    campaign". Just in few weeks 35.000 people signed that petition. For
    the first time in 95 years, this year on April 24, Armenian genocide
    was commemorated at Istanbul's Taksim square. I hope one day Turkey
    will recogise the Armenian Genocide. And that is important for Turkey
    itself. Many in Turkey are beginning to understand this and no one
    has any doubts almost about it outside of Turkey."

    To the question what Armenia calls for besides the acceptance
    of Turkey's liability for a Genocide the Foreign Minster Edward
    Nalbandian mentioned, "Since its independence, Armenia has never made
    any statements on territorial claims. It is unfortunate that certain
    Turkish political forces are using such arguments in order to create
    fear in the Turkish society."

    As for the demands for financial reparation the Armenian FM thinks
    that, "This is a very hypothetical question. There are descendants of
    Armenians all over the world who lost their properties back then. They
    could have juridical ways to proceed with their demands with or without
    recognition. This is a very normal in a civilized and modern world. So
    where is the problem?"

    President Serzh Sargsjan told the German newsweekly â~@~^Der Spiegel",
    a joint historian commission would only make sense if Turkey would
    admit it's guilt for the genocide: Ain't this an unacceptable demand
    for a process intended to explore what exactly happened, the next
    question of the Austrian journal was.

    "The fact of the Armenian Genocide can not be questioned. We told this
    to our Turkish colleagues right at the very beginning of this process.

    We agreed to establish subcomissions within an intergovernmental
    commission on the development of bilateral relations, and one of the
    subcomissions will have a goal - to restore confidence between two
    nations, but of course not at the expense of putting the Armenian
    Genocide under question.

    You couldn't reach the goal of restoring the confidence between nations
    by putting the Armenian Genocide under question," answered the FM.

    Recalling that four years ago the National Assembly of France has
    adopted a law that penalizes the renouncement of genocide against
    the Armenians the journalist of the Profil asked the FM to comment
    on the sense of adopting such kind of laws in countries that have
    nothing to do with the genocide.

    It is the same as is the case of adoption of laws and bills
    on Holocaust by countries that have nothing to do with it. We
    still remember the chilling words of Hitler: "Go, kill without
    mercy. After all, who remembers the Armenians? Genocide is a crime
    against humanity. As such it concerns humanity as a whole, and not
    only the people that was its victim."

    To the observation that Germany still refuses to use the expression
    â~@~^genocide" in it's official wording about the incidents of 1915 -
    although it bears joint responsibility for the massacres by looking
    the other way and being dormant and the question what Armenia expects
    of Germany, the Armenian FM answered, "In the German Bundestag's
    resolution entitled "Commemorating the expulsion and massacre of
    the Armenians in 1915" adopted exactly five years ago, we can read
    the following "Bundestag deplores the inglorious role played by
    the German Reich which, in spite of a wealth of information on the
    organized expulsion and annihilation of Armenians, has made no attempt
    to intervene and stop these atrocities".

    I believe that this wording speaks for itself. Every time the German
    leaders visiting Yad Vashem Memorial and paying tribute to victims
    of Holocoust are gaining the sympathy and veneration of the world
    community for that gesture. Germany has reconciled with its own
    past and we hope that Germany will serve as an example to Turkey to
    accomplish the same."

    At the end of the interview by the request of the journalist Edward
    Nalbandian answered the question of the journal what issues are to
    be discussed at this meeting with the Austrian foreign minister,
    "There are many of them. There is not too much accomplished in our
    bilateral relations. So this is a very good occasions to push them
    and develop new opportunities."

    And to the question "How does it come that the bilateral relations
    are weak?" he answered, "We couldn't say that they are weak, but we
    have bi potential to be explored. So the visit of Minister Michael
    Spendeleggerger could be a good impulse to develop and enhance our
    relations."




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X