Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Air Politics: Does The New TV Law Kill Hopes For Pluralism?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Air Politics: Does The New TV Law Kill Hopes For Pluralism?

    AIR POLITICS: DOES THE NEW TV LAW KILL HOPES FOR PLURALISM?

    ArmeniaNow
    Human rights | 22.06.10 | 14:42

    NAZIK ARMENAKYAN
    By Naira Hayrumyan
    ArmeniaNow correspondent

    A contest for TV frequencies will be held in Armenia on July 20. And
    on its last day of spring session on June 10, the National Assembly
    adopted the government-proposed amendments to the Law on Television
    and Radio. The government explains the amendments are necessary in
    view of switching to digital broadcasting in the country.

    At present, Armenia has 22 television channels. A majority of
    them broadcast for Yerevan only. Among these channels at least four
    retransmit Russian channels, several others mostly offer entertainment
    TV. All the other channels that report news and offer analytical
    programs have a marked pro-government stance, with the exception of
    Yerkir Media, a television company funded by the opposition Armenian
    Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun). The party quit the ruling
    coalition in April 2009 and declared itself opposition, but it opposes
    the government mainly on foreign-policy issues and, to some extent,
    on socio-economic issues, preferring not to touch on the issue of
    the government's legitimacy. International bodies and local media
    organizations do not consider that Yerkir Media ensures pluralism in
    the broadcasting sphere.

    The issue of A1 Plus, an independent TV channel controversially taken
    off the air in 2002, stands out in the process. Since losing its
    broadcasting license, the company has failed to win a single contest.

    The adopted amendments do not look encouraging for the company in
    terms of obtaining a broadcasting license. Chairman of the Board of the
    Public Television of Armenia Alexan Harutyunyan said on June 18 that
    "A1 Plus has become an 'idea fix' for international organizations." He
    did not specify whether the amended broadcast legislation enabled A1
    Plus to take part in the contest.

    Since they were published the draft amendments have been criticized
    by media organizations in Armenia and international bodies. Several
    organizations, including the Yerevan Press Club, media support NGO
    Internews, Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation Armenia issued
    a special statement on June 6 in which they called on international
    organizations not to assist the Government of the Republic of Armenia
    in the process of broadcast digitalization until it has submitted a
    revised bill.

    United States Ambassador to the Organization for Security and
    Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Ian Kelly reminded at the meeting of
    the Permanent Council in Vienna that OSCE member countries have a
    commitment to respect and protect fundamental human rights, such as
    freedom of speech and the media. The U.S. Mission to the OSCE noted
    that the amendments to the Armenian Law on Television and Radio were
    likely to lead to reduction in plurality on television, as well as
    to restricted access of the Armenian public to diverse information
    and opinions.

    In a statement issued earlier this month, Dunja Mijatovic, the OSCE
    Representative on Freedom of the Media, said Armenia's new law on TV
    and radio "fails to promote broadcast pluralism in the digital era".

    Among the major shortcomings Mijatovic identified the following: a
    limit to the number of broadcast channels; a lack of clear rules for
    the licensing of satellite, mobile telephone and online broadcasting;
    the placement of all forms of broadcasting under a regime of licensing
    or permission by the Regulator; the granting of authority to the
    courts to terminate broadcast licenses based on provisions in the law
    that contain undue limitations on freedom of the media; and a lack of
    procedures and terms for the establishment of private digital channels.

    In a letter dated June 15, Human Rights Watch, a global human rights
    watchdog, urged Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan not sign the law and
    instead return it to the National Assembly for continued deliberations.

    HRW also reminded Armenia of its obligation to implement the June
    17, 2008 European Court of Human Rights judgment finding Armenia in
    violation of Article 10 (Freedom of Expression) in relation to A1
    Plus's case. Despite this, President Sargsyan has signed the adopted
    amendments into law.

    What is remarkable in this whole story is that the Armenian authorities
    have not retreated under pressure from public opinion and international
    organizations. Experts say that it is connected with the intention
    to retain full control over television in the period before the
    parliamentary polls in 2012 and the presidential election in 2013.




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X