Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nkr: Aliyev Has Replaced Anger With "Mercy"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nkr: Aliyev Has Replaced Anger With "Mercy"

    ALIYEV HAS REPLACED ANGER WITH "MERCY"
    Leonid Martirosyan

    Azat Artsakh Daily
    Republic of Nagorno Karabakh [NKR]
    30 Sept 2010

    Azerbaijan makes another attempt to mislead the international
    community Lately, some softening of the public speeches of Azerbaijani
    President Ilham Aliyev is noticed, while earlier they comprised
    extremely tough statements. In particular, he has recently stated that
    Armenian refugees can also return to their former residence places
    in Azerbaijan, while earlier he noted only the return of Azerbaijani
    forcedly displaced persons to Nagorno Karabakh. To be frank, such
    major-constructive notes in the Azerbaijani leader's speeches are
    rare, and that's why they cause some doubt and even distrust. Our
    reaction is natural, as we stopped believing the Azerbaijani leaders
    long ago, which is quite fair, since they have never displayed
    sincerity, if not more... And what has encouraged Ilham Aliyev
    for such revelations? It may seem paradoxical, but first, it is the
    unreality and ephemerality of his proposal, as Aliyev himself realizes
    quite well the unrealizability of such an idea and, consequently,
    the lack of any risk for himself. It isn't excluded that he decided
    to speak of the possibility of the Armenian refugees' return on the
    advice of Ankara, which feels the political situation better and
    realizes WHAT the world would like to hear from Azerbaijan, as it is
    too bothered with Baku's endless militant threats. Probably, Ankara
    recommended Aliyev to be more compliant and tractable. In other words,
    with his non-binding statements Aliyev decided to clothe himself in
    the mantle of "peacemaker" and so to gain propagandistic dividends,
    which, as he guesses, can be converted into full-fledged currency
    for "buying" international structures, and first of all the UN,
    to the format of which he has dreamed to transfer the discussion of
    the Karabakh conflict for a long period. Aliyev's hypocrisy is more
    than understandable, but the international mediators' behavior is
    incomprehensible, as in the context of the conflict settlement they
    persistently speak of the refugees' return and only then - of the
    determination of Nagorno Karabakh's political status. Let's imagine
    hypothetically that "the process has started". But, it is obviously
    fraught with bloodshed. The society of any party of the conflict
    isn't ready for the refugees' "reception", which is fully the "merit"
    of Azerbaijan, the propagandistic machine of which has sowed the seeds
    of hostility between the two nations for many years. Can we currently
    speak of the Armenian refugees' safe return to present-day Azerbaijan
    where a cruel totalitarian regime and violent xenophobia are ruling?


    This is a rhetorical question. International law definitely prohibits
    exposing conflicts' victims to recurrent danger before the final
    resolution of the issue. Let's recall the beginning of the Karabakh
    Movement when the then leadership of Azerbaijan, aiming at the radical
    change of the demographic situation in Armenian Nagorno Karabakh in
    favor of the Azerbaijani population, took an inhumane and adventurous
    step, populating the region with Turks-Meskhets from a conflict area
    in Uzbekistan, actually making them hostages, or rather victims of
    its nationalistic policy. As a result, these people found themselves
    in another center of interethnic discord, and only Baku is responsible
    for this political irresponsibility. The OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmen
    and the UN leadership are supposed to realize that in case of the
    refugees' return before the conflict's final resolution the South
    Caucasus is threatened with "Balkanization" or even "Palestinization".


    Because the Balkan conflicts continued smoldering, while they haven't
    diminished in Middle East for decades just because there wasn't
    any ethno-territorial demarcation; instead, ethnic dissemination
    and enclaves within alien state formations existed there. In this
    context, the firm position of Israel is quite clear - to prevent
    the Palestinians' return to Jerusalem, despite the international
    community's pressure, as it considers such a situation extremely
    dangerous. Is it good or bad, but in case of the Karabakh conflict
    ethnic, political, and territorial demarcation of the Armenian
    and Azerbaijani people took place. And the international community
    shouldn't, at the instigation of Baku, make an experiment with the
    refugees' return, the consequences of which are more than obvious. By
    the way, the recent research of Sigma Analytical Center has disclosed
    the negative attitude of the Azerbaijani forced migrants to the
    prospect of their return to their former residence places in Nagorno
    Karabakh - only 10% of them expressed their wish to return. The NKR
    is successively building and consolidating its independent statehood
    and sees no alternative to its international recognition. The issue of
    the Azerbaijanis' return to Nagorno Karabakh can be resolved only at
    the negotiations between Stepanakert and Baku, under the compulsory
    consent of the abovementioned 10% to accept the jurisdiction of the
    independent Nagorno Karabakh Republic. Though, this issue is the
    matter of the future, which isn't quite definite yet.




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X