Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Fleeting Nature Of Armenia's Political Parties

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Fleeting Nature Of Armenia's Political Parties

    The Fleeting Nature of Armenia's Political Parties
    Gevorg Darbinyan

    http://hetq.am/en/politics/40664/
    [ 2010/10/04 | 13:52 ]

    A politics based on individuals not ideology

    Putting forth the nomination of Samvel Balasanyan for the empty post
    of RA National Assembly Deputy President, was just as normal for the
    Prosperous Armenia Party (PAP) as its recent move to remove Arevik
    Petrosyan from the same spot. Both moves were equally beyond the pale
    of logic.

    Samvel Balasanyan, who only this year registered with the PAP after
    leaving the Rule of Law Party in 2007, is just as "devoted" to the PAP
    as his predecessor Petrosyan. Just days ago Khachik Galstyan, spokesman
    for PAP leader Gagik Tsarukyan, argued that the Balasanyan nomination
    was in line with the party's intention to revitalize its participation
    in the parliament. As to how Balasanyan, a former Rule of Law member,
    will revitalize the party is hard to imagine. Perhaps the PAP is
    counting on Balasanyan's rhetorical talents and his preference for
    chest thumping when giving speeches. Such theatrics will come across
    as even more absurd and pitiful from the podium of the deputy speaker.

    Balasanyan's nomination betrays once again the paucity of qualified
    cadres within the PAP, and this has instigated Gagik Tsarukyan to take
    illogical steps. This in turn, despite the party's large number of
    members and influence, reveals the fact that the party still hasn't
    consolidated internally. The other parties in the ruling coalition,
    the Republican Party and the Rule of Law, face a similar problem. To
    a great extent, this situation is particular to all political parties
    in Armenia. In essence what we have in Armenia is politics without
    parties or parties without politics.

    Recently, political analyst Armen Badalyan declared in earnest that,
    "A new force just needs six months to come into being. For this
    reason experienced specialists are needed to mould and shape that
    force. It's not a problem. The creation of a political party is the
    result of the work carried out by qualified experts." Mr. Badalyan
    humbly underestimates our potential. According to official data,
    there are presently 74 political parties registered with the RA
    Ministry of Justice.

    The "Law on Political Parties" was adopted back in 2002. In other
    words, on average, one new political force in Armenia is created every
    month. This is why there is no need for experts. Put another way,
    a new ideology, a new program to save the nation, comes to the fore
    in Armenia on a monthly basis. Whether or not the public demand for
    such a plethora of parties exists or not is another question.

    As a rule, political parties in Armenia are formed to serve the
    interests of individuals, or they are redirected to do so. For example,
    oligarchs like Mikayel Baghdasarov or Barsegh Beglaryan can create
    parties to defend their economic interests. Similarly, the PAP
    was formed to serve the interests of Gagik Beglaryan, the Rule of
    Law Party - Artur Baghdasaryan, Republican Party - Serzh Sargsyan,
    New Times Party - Aram Karapetyan, National Unity Party - Artashes
    Geghamyan, and so forth. These individuals are not the leaders of
    the political parties, but rather their owners.

    The very continued existence of these parties is dependent on the
    individual owners. They are the ones who decide, based on a host of
    personal variables, who is appropriate for what government post, etc.

    PAP parliamentary faction Secretary Aram Safaryan, for example, when
    speaking about the new nominee for the deputy speaker's post, said
    that, "...Mr. Tsarukyan will select a nominee, the political council
    will ratify the nominee and our public will be informed." That's to
    say the function of the political council is merely to rubber stamp
    the nominees of the party boss and ratify any decisions from the top.

    It wouldn't be an exaggeration to say that the leaders of such parties
    are idols to be worshipped. The entire party would collapse just by
    bringing down the idol. Just as it has become so easy to create a
    party, it is equally easy to bring about its ruin.

    For example, Republican Party council member Razmik Zohrabyan states
    with all due conviction that if they had wanted to weaken the PAP it
    would have happened. And this, in fact, is the reality of the matter.

    All it would take is to constrain Gagik Tsarukyan with a few choice
    compromising factors and the PAP, in practice, would turn into a
    political corpse and the next rat race competition would begin. The
    Rule of Law Party lived that nightmare in 2007 when, after having
    discredited Artur Baghdasaryan and stripping him of the post of
    National Assembly President, the party stood at the precipice. In
    the same fashion, the National Democratic Union, National Unity and
    the Constitutional Rights Union have been relegated to the sidelines.

    In the public consciousness, the political struggle has been
    transformed into a continuing struggle among individuals. Average
    citizens do not say that the Republican Party and the PAP are battling
    it out, or that the HAK and the Republican Party are in competition.

    Rather they identify the leaders; Serzh Sargsyan vs. Gagik Tsarukyan,
    or Levon Ter-Petrosyan vs. Serzh Sargsyan.

    As a result, political parties formed on an ideological basis lose
    their public relevance and are quickly marginalized. In essence,
    then, what we are faced with in the political arena is a complete
    process of non-ideology.

    All parties created on an ideological basis, without exception,
    are facing a serious crisis. As yet, there is no foreseeable exit
    strategy. On the national conservative front, the ARF finds itself
    in this morass. On the national liberal front there is the Heritage
    Party; The HHZh (Armenian National Movement). And then there's the
    Communist Party on the socialist front.

    Given the level of public perception, none of these ideologically
    based parties can, by themselves, garner the 5% vote ceiling needed
    in the 2012 parliamentary elections.

    Instead, the National Assembly will almost totally be full of
    Balasanyan's and his ilk.

    No one will ever ask them why there was a need to replace National
    Assembly President Tigran Torosyan with someone like Hovik Abrahamyan,
    or Arevik Petrosyan with Samvel Balasanyan.

    What will be required is not to forget who the owners are and when
    is the most opportune time to replace them.




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X