Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey's muzzled muckrakers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turkey's muzzled muckrakers

    The International Herald Tribune
    May 6, 2011 Friday


    Turkey's muzzled muckrakers

    BY ANDREW FINKEL
    ISTANBUL

    Turkey holds a record number of journalists behind bars. But the most
    effective censor in Turkey today is the press itself.

    Imagine if back in the days of Watergate, Bob Woodward and Carl
    Bernstein had been put on trial for being part of the very conspiracy
    they were trying to uncover. Then suppose a large section of the
    Washington press corps proceeded to pat federal prosecutors on the
    back for a job well done.

    Such is the life of a journalist in today's Turkey - a world in which
    the justice system punishes the innocent while the Fourth Estate turns
    a blind eye. Turkey now holds the dubious record for being the country
    with the most imprisoned journalists - 57 according to a report by the
    Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. There are as many
    as 1,000 other cases pending against journalists, many of whose only
    crime was rigorous reporting.

    Yet Turkey is also Europe's fastest growing economy, a candidate
    country for membership in the European Union, and a nation publicly
    committed to rooting out the antidemocratic and militaristic forces
    that have marred its recent past. Turkey should be a beacon to its
    fellow Muslim-majority nations in North Africa and the Middle East
    trying throw off the yoke of authoritarianism. But it cannot set an
    example so long as its own government refuses to tolerate criticism
    and a cowed media looks the other way.

    Turkey has countless capable reporters and photographers eager to do
    their jobs. For years, these journalists treated the occasional
    encounter with the country's antediluvian penal code as a professional
    rite of passage. I myself stood in the dock more than 10 years ago,
    charged with ''insulting the army'' in my column for a
    Turkish-language paper. I was eventually fired after the chiefs of
    staff - upset about my reporting on the Kurdish issue, pressured my
    editors to give me the boot.

    But state repression is not the only problem; the jelly-like backbone
    of Turkey's Fourth Estate is also to blame. Sadly, the most effective
    censor in Turkey today is the press itself. To adopt a stance critical
    of current policies is to position oneself in opposition to the
    government - and editors only do so as a calculated risk. Columns
    exposing corruption or criticizing the government's sprawl-inducing
    environmental policies are simply spiked.

    When Turkish newspapers try to speak their mind, they often discover
    their advertisers dropping out, explaining apologetically that they
    have ''come under pressure.''

    Some of the journalists currently behind bars have been charged in
    connection with a long-running conspiracy trial intended to dismantle
    what state prosecutors describe as a well-organized network -
    codenamed Ergenekon - that intended to provoke a military coup. Others
    are charged with defying onerous reporting restrictions on court
    proceedings, including the Ergenekon trial itself.

    Most of the Ergenekon suspects are serving or retired military
    officers charged with plotting or carrying out violent acts in order
    to turn public opinion against the governing AK Party, which has its
    roots in an Islamic movement.

    But recently, prosecutors ordered the detention of two respected
    journalists, Nedim Sener and Ahmet Sik, who were once supporters of
    the Ergenekon trial.

    Sener's reporting revealed that the police had stopped short of
    finding those really responsible for the murder in 2007 of the
    Turkish-Armenian newspaper editor Hrant Dink because the trail might
    have led back to the police themselves. Sik's unpublished manuscript,
    which the police tried and failed to ban before it began freely
    circulating on the Internet, pointed a finger at a prominent religious
    group known as the Gülen movement. Sik's book alleged that the group's
    members, who have close ties with the AK Party, had penetrated the
    police force.

    Last month, in my regular column for an English-language edition of
    the daily Zaman - which is affiliated with the Gülen movement - I
    argued that the government's fight against antidemocratic forces was
    taking a decidedly undemocratic turn.

    Though I am not a member of the Gulen movement, I believed that Zaman,
    like the Christian Science Monitor in the United States, could provide
    a platform for differing points of view. So I argued the obvious, that
    as a newspaper we had an obligation to defend Sik's freedom of
    expression in order to protect our own integrity. The article cost me
    my job.

    My former editor published a column justifying my dismissal, claiming
    that I had fallen prey to ''strong and dark propaganda.'' I am not the
    only one: Cuneyt Ulsever of Zaman's rival Hurriyet had his column axed
    after being unofficially censored for months by a colleague who
    demanded that he revise passages the government might not like.

    So this week, as we mark World Press Freedom Day, let us hope that
    those journalists languishing in Turkish prisons will be freed until
    the courts prove them guilty - and that their colleagues on the
    outside throw off their shackles to engage in proper journalism.




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X