Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why The "Foster Family" Program That Offers Savings For The Budget I

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why The "Foster Family" Program That Offers Savings For The Budget I

    WHY THE "FOSTER FAMILY" PROGRAM THAT OFFERS SAVINGS FOR THE BUDGET IS NOT CONTINUED: A. GRIGORYAN'S RESPONSE

    Panorama
    June 24 2011
    Armenia

    "Since 2006 the project for unloading the institutions that protect
    and care of children has been developed and implemented in order
    to unload the institutions and to prevent the children's access
    to those institutions; since 2008 until now the "Foster family
    "program is being implemented. Since 2008 35 children received
    care in foster families." This is an excerpt from a letter that was
    signed by Minister of Labor and Social Affairs of the Republic of
    Armenia Arthur Grigoryan. The letter contains a number of questions
    and answers that refer to the activities of orphanages and other
    fostering institutions. The questions were posed by the member of the
    "Heritage" Faction Anahit Bakhshyan.

    It is pretty easy to say why particularly this part was selected from
    the letter of the Minister. We had noticed some discrepancies in the
    numbers presented.

    Thus, it was just one month ago, on May 16, that Panorama.am presented
    an interview with Ms. Lala Ghazaryan, the Head of family, women and
    children issues department within the Armenian Ministry of Labor and
    Social Issues. Ms. Ghazaryan presented in details the role of the
    foster family and mentioned that, "Today, for example, we have 23
    such families, where 25 children live.

    Note that before this program entered under the full control of
    the state in 2008, it was being implemented by the United Nations
    Children's Fund / UNICEF /, since the mentioned period not a single
    child was given to a foster family. In the same time it should be noted
    that the state has adopted the policy of unloading the orphanages and
    other foster institutions, however this particular version, which is
    considered one of the effective ways of the above mentioned policy,
    does not work.

    Continuing to quote the Minister's answers addressed to A. Bakhshyan,
    let's focus our attention to the fact that, as A. Grigoryan says,
    "according to the statistics, as a result of the implementation of
    the project the number of children in orphanages has decreased in
    recent years due to state policy."

    Mrs. Bakhshyan, citing in the letter addressed to the Minister the
    results of the research presented by the UNICEF recently, mentioned:

    "The transportation and placement of children in foster family can
    be savings for the budget. For example, by the data of 2009, in 8
    orphanages of the republic the annual expenses of one child in average
    makes U.S. $ 5 176; for 905 children 4 .684.017$ from the budget were
    provided. While presenting that research was also pointed at the fact
    that only 25 children were placed in the foster families. And this
    in case when using the new funding guidelines more children may be
    directed to the foster families."

    In response to this Minister Grigoryan wrote: "The foster family
    is one of the ways of replacement of children who are left without
    parental care; however the experience shows that problems arise between
    foster and biological parents of the children that are given to the
    foster parent families from the orphanages, and that is not within
    the child's interests."

    In other words, except for this quote, Minister A. Grigoryan doesn't
    refer to the question of the deputy whether the displacement and
    placement of the children into foster families may serve savings for
    the budget.



    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X