Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: 'The Patriarchate Perception' In Turkey's Global Strategy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: 'The Patriarchate Perception' In Turkey's Global Strategy

    'THE PATRIARCHATE PERCEPTION' IN TURKEY'S GLOBAL STRATEGY
    by Bekir Gunay & Emrah Usta*

    Today's Zaman
    July 19 2011
    Turkey

    The institution known officially as the Fener Greek Patriarchate in
    Turkey and the Ecumenical Patriarchate in the rest of the world,
    serves as the spiritual leader of the Orthodox community, whose
    members exceed 250 million.

    After the Roman Empire split into East and West, the Christians in the
    Byzantine Empire were subordinated to the Ä°stanbul Orthodox Church,
    whereas the Orthodox Church known as the Oriental Church separated
    from the Catholic Church in the fifth century. Noticing this dual
    distinction between religious groups, Fatih Sultan Mehmet recognized
    the depth of all these in the Patriarch of the Byzantine Empire.

    It could be said that Mehmet relied on some expansionist policies
    that did not actually seem pursuable at the beginning. A problem
    arose in the vast empire stretching from Dardanelles to Edirne and
    even Trachea. This problem was born in an empire unable to penetrate
    the Balkans and expand its territories. This structure, the Orthodox
    Patriarch, controlled the Orthodox world and enjoyed vast territory
    stretching from the Balkans to Moscow, from Jerusalem to Alexandria.

    Attempting to create such a powerful front is the main motive for
    Fatih Sultan Mehmet's decision to emphasize the state vision through
    Ä°stanbul on the one hand and Rome and Madrid on the other. The key
    to this attempt was the conquest of Ä°stanbul, which was controlled
    by the Byzantines.

    In line with this policy, the Ottoman sultan issued some decrees
    recognizing some privileges for the Patriarchate and this became a
    custom of the state up until Mahmud II. The Ottoman rulers, under
    this custom, granted privileges to the Patriarchate and thus the
    legal status of the Fener Greek Patriarchate became permanent.

    Where does Turkey stand in the Patriarchate issue?

    Turkey has been trying to identify specific policies regarding the
    Patriarchate issue since 2003. The foreign policy changes in the
    second term of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party)
    also had implications for domestic policies. This was followed by
    attempts to integrate non-Muslims and non-Turks into the system
    through a democratization process that peaked in the Sept. 12, 2010
    referendum. While it is too early to witness the results of the opening
    process, further moves should follow. The main goal here is to expedite
    the creation of a democratic constitution by President Abdullah Gul,
    who acts independent of political considerations and governmental
    priorities, and to contribute to the emergence of a civilian approach.

    Contrary to popular belief, the Patriarchate issue and similar
    problems are not only related to foreign affairs but also to domestic
    politics. In recent years, the government has acted humbly, not
    taking the European court's decision to an upper appeal chamber in
    the aftermath of Hrant Dink's murder and adopting a lenient discourse
    toward the Armenians, which has had constructive impacts on the Greek
    minority in Turkey as well.

    A moderate stance was adopted on this matter by granting Armenians
    permission to hold religious services in the Akhdamar Church in Van
    province and Greeks in the Sumela Monastery in Trabzon province.

    Armenian Daron Acemoglu's being offered the position of permanent
    representative to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
    Development (OECD) is further proof of Turkey's changing policy towards
    non-Muslims in the country. However, giving the impression that these
    policies were adopted to facilitate Turkey's accession to the EU is
    not a proper strategy.

    Considering all these elements, it is evident that the issue of the
    Patriarchate's status will sooner or later be the most serious issue
    for Turkey to address. Turkey should adopt a more comprehensive
    approach than simply subordinating the Patriarchate to the Fatih
    District Governor's Office and it should redesign this institution
    within its 2023 vision. Turkey should be able to use this as part of
    a global power strategy.

    Evidently, a number of states, including the US, Germany and Russia,
    are interested in the Patriarchate issue. It is also apparent that
    Russia has a particular interest and that the current policies will
    cause some sort of tension with Russia. While Russian the perspective
    overlaps with the Turkish stance in regards to the reopening the
    Halki Seminary, it is obvious that it will pursue a more aggressive
    policy -- despite its strategic ties with Turkey -- in case of the
    Patriarch's death or sickness.

    Russian interests

    Russia wants to consolidate its domination over the Patriarch and
    the Orthodox people by ensuring the opening of Halki Seminary because
    the Patriarch has to be a graduate of the Halki Seminary, despite the
    fact that he is a Turkish citizen under the Treaty of Lausanne. The
    Patriarchate remains disinterested in this issue for now. Another
    power that will be influential in the multidimensional relations
    of the Patriarchate will be the European Union line stretching from
    England to Greece.

    Turkey should place trust in the Patriarchate to continue its
    domination over the Orthodox world and the establishment of a
    check-and-balance mechanism. To this end, the measures to be taken in
    connection with the 2023 vision include opening the Halki Seminary,
    which should be opened not only for the Greek minority, but also for
    Armenian and Assyrian citizens. Further steps should also include
    assigning the graduates of the seminary as public servants, redefining
    the status of the Patriarch, having heads of state and the prime
    minister attend some religious services and establishing a ministry
    of religious and sectarian unity instead of the current Religious
    Affairs Directorate. The Turkish Cooperation and Development Agency
    (TÄ°KA) should take steps towards the Orthodox world as well.

    The AK Party, which well understands arguments within the system of
    religion and belief, should make greater efforts to offer lasting
    solutions to the ongoing problems that the Patriarchate and non-Muslim
    citizens encounter (reopening of the Halki Seminary, the assets of
    the foundations). It appears that the party is determined to take
    constructive steps in the matter. Such a constructive approach will
    raise t non-Muslims' confidence in the state authority and consolidate
    the country's strength against European and other regional states.

    In conclusion, it is impossible to comprehend the issue of the
    Patriarchate, which suffered greatly from a firm legal status in
    the late stages of the Ottoman Empire and the early stages of the
    republican era, through 21st century policies. To this end, Turkey
    needs to consider this issue to devise a proper global strategy in
    connection with the 2023 vision. Turkey's current ambivalence toward
    the issue is mainly attributable to its susceptibility to foreign
    interference and nationalistic sentiments in the country. However,
    it should also be recalled that such problems may be overcome by
    integrating different communities from the Orthodox world in the
    process.

    *Bekir Gunay is an associate professor at Ä°stanbul Suleyman Å~^ah
    University and a Central Asia fellow at the Wise Men Center for
    Strategic Studies (BÄ°LGESAM) in Ä°stanbul and co-author, Emrah Usta
    is a transatlantic fellow at the Praxis Thinking Institute.



    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X