Tweet
WAR IS INEVITABLE
Lragir.am
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/interview23065.html
24/08/2011
Interview with Alexander Qananyan, political scientist, resident of
Karvachar, NKR
How would you comment on the failure to push the sides to reach an
agreement on the basic principles of Madrid at the Kazan three-party
meeting followed by Medvedev-Aliyev meeting though the Minsk Group
Co-Chairs had issued an obligating approval?
The "basic principles" drafted in the framework of the process
of negotiations mediated by the Minsk Group were so far from the
current military-political situation that they were born dead. Only
those naïve who know nothing about the essence of the issue or such
dilettante experts who pursue goals that have nothing in common
with the settlement of the issue, such as Thomas de Waal, or the
author of the draft of the principles Sabine Freiser could believe
in the implementation of those principles. Both Serzh Sargsyan and
Ilham Aliyev have already understood that an attempt at even partial
fulfillment of the principles of Madrid will blow up the situation in
the region and lead to a war with an uncontrolled and unpredictable
outcome. Aliyev has apparently understood that the world powers
"supporting" the process are unable to save Serzh Sargsyan's government
and physical existence should he sign the "capitulation" of Madrid or
attempts to return the territories. In other words, Aliyev realized
that even in case of political and physical sacrifice of Sargsyan,
Sarkozy or Obama or Medvedev won't offer him any region.
Hence, only the military option is left to Aliyev. But he is a great
deal more realistic than Sargsyan (thanks to not having beside him
such adviser-ideologists of "end of state" as Tigran Sargsyan) and
understands that war would pose grave and incalculable dangers.
Dangerous uncertainties multiply against the background of comparative
indirect hints by Medvedev on the events in South Ossetia.
But this does not mean they will be able to persuade Aliyev not to
start a war. Foreign forces interested in the resumption of hostilities
in some stage may pledge guarantees to Aliyev and push him to next
war adventure. Although, again, unlike the Armenian leadership, Ilham
does not trust foreign forces blindly and unconditionally. He knows
he might be betrayed. He is already terrified as he can see tendencies
of his "mubarakization" projected by the West. But this does not mean
there will be no war. Proceeding from historical and political rules,
it is even inevitable, and we need to be ready for it with maximum
awareness. Ilham Aliyev is a hostage of his craving for government
and wealth and years of "bold" vows to cause total military defeat of
Armenians. The tendencies of "Mubarakization" and the prospect of a
great many other uncertainties hurt Aliyev's "tender" soul, and one
day, out of this complex of hopelessness, he may resume hostilities...
Don't regular failures of negotiation prove that without NKR
participation the parties will never reach agreement?
Though it may sound strange for our audience, the issue has nothing
to do with NKR participation in the negotiations. Once, the first
president of Armenia, trying to avoid personal responsibility in
front of the international community for the Artsakh war, committed
a series of constitutional crimes regarding not only the recognition
of territorial integrity of independent Azerbaijan within the borders
of Soviet Azerbaijan, but also imposing on the Artsakh authorities
"independence" from Armenia. Hence, the real and only guarantee of
failure of the "Madrid" and similar principles is not the appearance
of the Artsakh authorities at the table of negotiations as a "separate
side" but also the strong defiance of the Armenian people and first
of all the Armenians of Artsakh and the readiness to support it
politically with popular determination.
Let's recall that in 1989 Artsakh was legally and de facto part of
Armenia. The naïve performance to present Artsakh as a "separate
party" allegedly created a large scope for diplomatic "maneuver". In
reality, everyone knows the obvious reality that Artsakh is just a
region of Armenia with a special status.
Will the Minsk Group-mediated negotiations continue?
These negotiations following the ceasefire cannot be effective because
they have been originally based on legal and political self-limitations
by the Armenian official diplomacy and other vicious premises. Hence,
it is not accidental that proposals on settlement were not only
unbeneficial for Armenia also would lead to de facto capitulation
and a national catastrophe. The alternative is clear - as a result
of the failure in the genocidal war perpetrated by Azerbaijan
against Artsakh the current status quo has been established. Vast
territories that used to be populated with Armenians and belong to
Armenians historically and legally are now out of our control. There
was redistribution of the Armenian and Azeri population in accordance
with the areas of control. Similar resolutions were drafted and legally
set down in 1945 during Europe's post-war regulation in East Prussia,
Pomerania, Silesia and Sudetes, and recently in Bosnia, Croatia,
Kosovo. Azerbaijan should admit the defeat of its genocidal policy and
be happy with our greatest gift to that country, the ceasefire. The
regional geopolitical situation and Armenia's national potential are
enough to have such a position. The conflict over Artsakh, as well as
the Arab-Israeli conflicts defy mechanisms of final settlement. This is
an illusion, "utopia". In the case of such deep and defying historical,
geographic, civilization conflicts, "peace is possible only when
war is impossible". The only guarantee of non-resumption of war and
lasting regional stability is maintenance of general military political
balance. The forces which are not interested in unpredictable wars in
the region are already close to adequate understanding of this reality,
meanwhile, the Armenian ruling elite is usually and strategically late.
I wonder what the people of this region, especially the residents
of Karvachar think about the negotiations which render surrender of
their homes to Azerbaijan possible?
Õ"Õ¡O~@Õ¾Õ¡Õ³Õ¡Õ¼Õ" Õ¢Õ¡Õ¶Õ¯Õ¹Õ¸O~BÕ©ÕµÕ¸O~BÕ¶Õ¨
Õ¬Õ¸O~BÕ®Õ¸O~BÕ´ Õ§ ÕºÕ¡Õ¿Õ¥O~@Õ¡Õ¦Õ´Õ"
Õ¡O~@Õ¤ÕµÕ¸O~BÕ¶O~DÕ¸O~BÕ´ Õ°Õ¡Õ´Õ¡Õ¯Õ¸Õ²Õ´Õ¡Õ¶Õ"Õ¸O~@Õ¥Õ¶
Õ¿Õ¸O~BÕªÕ¡Õ® Õ·O~@Õ"Õ¡Õ¶Õ¸O~BÕ´ Õ¢Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶Õ¸Õ¶ Õ¯ÕµÕ¡Õ¶O~DÕ"
Õ¾Õ¥O~@Õ¡Õ°Õ¡Õ½Õ¿Õ¡Õ¿Õ´Õ¡Õ¶ Õ£Õ¸O~@Õ®Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶ ÕÕ¶Õ¤Õ"O~@Õ¶Õ¥O~@Õ¨:
Õ"Õ¡Õ²Õ¡O~DÕ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶Õ¸O~BÕ©ÕµÕ¡Õ´Õ¢ Õ¡ÕµÕ½Õ¿Õ¥Õ² O~DÕ¹Õ¥O~@Õ¶
Õ¥Õ¶ Õ°Õ¥Õ¿Õ¡O~DO~@O~DO~@Õ¾Õ¸O~BÕ´: Ô"Õ½Õ¯ Õ¨Õ¶Õ¤Õ°Õ¡Õ¶Õ¸O~BO~@
Õ¡Õ¼Õ´Õ¡Õ´Õ¢` Õ¿Õ¡O~@Õ¡Õ®O~DÕ¶Õ¥O~@Õ" Õ°Õ¡Õ¶Õ±Õ¶Õ´Õ¡Õ¶ Õ¶Õ¯Õ¡Õ¿Õ´Õ¡Õ´Õ¢
Õ¾Õ¥O~@Õ¡Õ¢Õ¥O~@Õ´Õ¸O~BÕ¶O~DÕ¨ ÕÕ"Õ½Õ¿ Õ¢Õ¡O~AÕ¡Õ½Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶ Õ§:
Ô"Õ´ Õ¯Õ¸Õ²Õ´Õ"O~A Õ°Õ¡Õ¾Õ¥Õ¬Õ¥Õ´, Õ¸O~@ Õ~@Õ~@ O~G Ô¼Õ~BÕ~@
Õ"Õ·ÕÕ¡Õ¶Õ¸O~BÕ©ÕµÕ¸O~BÕ¶Õ¶Õ¥O~@Õ¨ ÕºÕ¥Õ¿O~D Õ§ Õ¡Õ¶Õ°Õ¡ÕºÕ¡Õ²
Õ¾Õ¥O~@Õ½Õ¯Õ½Õ¥Õ¶ 2007 Õ©Õ¾Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶Õ"O~A O~CÕ¡Õ½Õ¿Õ¡O~AÕ"
Õ¯Õ¥O~@ÕºÕ¸Õ¾ Õ¯Õ¡Õ½Õ¥O~AÕ¾Õ¡Õ® Õ¢Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡O~@Õ¡Õ¶Õ¡ÕµÕ"Õ¶
Õ·Õ"Õ¶Õ¡O~@Õ¡O~@Õ¸O~BÕ©ÕµÕ¸O~BÕ¶Õ¨ Õ¡Õ¦Õ¡Õ¿Õ¡Õ£O~@Õ¾Õ¡Õ®
Õ¿Õ¡O~@Õ¡Õ®O~DÕ¶Õ¥O~@Õ¸O~BÕ´ O~G Õ¾Õ¥O~@Õ¡Õ¢Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯Õ¥O~AÕ´Õ¡Õ¶
O~DÕ¡Õ²Õ¡O~DÕ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶Õ¸O~BÕ©ÕµÕ¡Õ¶Õ¨ Õ°Õ¡Õ²Õ¸O~@Õ¤Õ¥Õ¶
Õ¼Õ¡Õ¦Õ´Õ¡Õ¾Õ¡O~@Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶ Õ¢Õ¶Õ¸O~BÕµÕ© O~G Õ®Õ¡Õ¾Õ¡Õ¬:
Ô±ÕµÕ¬Õ¡ÕºÕ¥Õ½` Õ¶O~@Õ¡Õ¶O~D ÕÕ½Õ¿Õ¡Õ£Õ¸O~BÕµÕ¶Õ½ O~G
Õ°O~@Õ¡ÕºÕ¡O~@Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡ÕµÕ¶Õ¸O~@Õ¥Õ¶ Õ´Õ¥Õ²Õ¡Õ¤O~@Õ¾Õ¥Õ¬Õ¸O~B
Õ¥Õ¶ Õ~@Õ¡ÕµÕ¡Õ½Õ¿Õ¡Õ¶Õ" (Õ~@Õ~@, Ô±O~@O~AÕ¡Õ) Õ¡Õ¦Õ£Õ¡ÕµÕ"Õ¶
Õ¡Õ¶Õ¾Õ¿Õ¡Õ¶Õ£Õ¸O~BÕ©ÕµÕ¡Õ¶ Õ¤Õ¥Õ´ Õ°Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡ÕºÕ¥Õ¿Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶
Õ®Õ¡Õ¶O~@Õ¡Õ£Õ¸O~BÕµÕ¶ Õ°Õ¡Õ¶O~AÕ¡O~D Õ£Õ¸O~@Õ®Õ¥Õ¬Õ¸O~B Õ´Õ¥Õ": Ô"
Õ¤Õ¥Õº, Õ´Õ"Õ¶Õ½Õ¯ÕµÕ¡Õ¶ Õ£Õ¸O~@Õ®Õ¨Õ¶Õ©Õ¡O~AÕ" Õ¾Õ¥O~@Õ"Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶
Õ¿ÕÕ¸O~BO~@ Õ¡O~@Õ¤ÕµÕ¸O~BÕ¶O~DÕ¶Õ¥O~@Õ¶ Õ¡ÕµÕ½ Õ°Õ¡O~@O~AÕ¸O~BÕ´
Õ¶O~@Õ¡Õ¶O~A Õ¸O~@O~GÕ§ Õ¡ÕµÕ¬Õ¨Õ¶Õ¿O~@Õ¡Õ¶O~D Õ¹Õ¥Õ¶ Õ©Õ¸Õ²Õ¶Õ¸O~BÕ´:
The population of Karvachar is coping with the practical problems of
reconstruction of the region vastly damaged by the war. Here, very
few people are interested in politics. The general attitude to the
surrender of territories is negative. I would add on my behalf that
the RoA and NKR authorities need to resume housing construction in the
liberated areas suspended in 2007 and draft and launch a strategy of
the repopulation policy. Otherwise, they will be accused strongly and
publicly for committing the gravest crime against the national security
of Armenia (RoA, Artsakh). By the way, recent miserable results of
the Minsk Group-mediated negotiations allow for no other alternative.
Lragir.am
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/interview23065.html
24/08/2011
Interview with Alexander Qananyan, political scientist, resident of
Karvachar, NKR
How would you comment on the failure to push the sides to reach an
agreement on the basic principles of Madrid at the Kazan three-party
meeting followed by Medvedev-Aliyev meeting though the Minsk Group
Co-Chairs had issued an obligating approval?
The "basic principles" drafted in the framework of the process
of negotiations mediated by the Minsk Group were so far from the
current military-political situation that they were born dead. Only
those naïve who know nothing about the essence of the issue or such
dilettante experts who pursue goals that have nothing in common
with the settlement of the issue, such as Thomas de Waal, or the
author of the draft of the principles Sabine Freiser could believe
in the implementation of those principles. Both Serzh Sargsyan and
Ilham Aliyev have already understood that an attempt at even partial
fulfillment of the principles of Madrid will blow up the situation in
the region and lead to a war with an uncontrolled and unpredictable
outcome. Aliyev has apparently understood that the world powers
"supporting" the process are unable to save Serzh Sargsyan's government
and physical existence should he sign the "capitulation" of Madrid or
attempts to return the territories. In other words, Aliyev realized
that even in case of political and physical sacrifice of Sargsyan,
Sarkozy or Obama or Medvedev won't offer him any region.
Hence, only the military option is left to Aliyev. But he is a great
deal more realistic than Sargsyan (thanks to not having beside him
such adviser-ideologists of "end of state" as Tigran Sargsyan) and
understands that war would pose grave and incalculable dangers.
Dangerous uncertainties multiply against the background of comparative
indirect hints by Medvedev on the events in South Ossetia.
But this does not mean they will be able to persuade Aliyev not to
start a war. Foreign forces interested in the resumption of hostilities
in some stage may pledge guarantees to Aliyev and push him to next
war adventure. Although, again, unlike the Armenian leadership, Ilham
does not trust foreign forces blindly and unconditionally. He knows
he might be betrayed. He is already terrified as he can see tendencies
of his "mubarakization" projected by the West. But this does not mean
there will be no war. Proceeding from historical and political rules,
it is even inevitable, and we need to be ready for it with maximum
awareness. Ilham Aliyev is a hostage of his craving for government
and wealth and years of "bold" vows to cause total military defeat of
Armenians. The tendencies of "Mubarakization" and the prospect of a
great many other uncertainties hurt Aliyev's "tender" soul, and one
day, out of this complex of hopelessness, he may resume hostilities...
Don't regular failures of negotiation prove that without NKR
participation the parties will never reach agreement?
Though it may sound strange for our audience, the issue has nothing
to do with NKR participation in the negotiations. Once, the first
president of Armenia, trying to avoid personal responsibility in
front of the international community for the Artsakh war, committed
a series of constitutional crimes regarding not only the recognition
of territorial integrity of independent Azerbaijan within the borders
of Soviet Azerbaijan, but also imposing on the Artsakh authorities
"independence" from Armenia. Hence, the real and only guarantee of
failure of the "Madrid" and similar principles is not the appearance
of the Artsakh authorities at the table of negotiations as a "separate
side" but also the strong defiance of the Armenian people and first
of all the Armenians of Artsakh and the readiness to support it
politically with popular determination.
Let's recall that in 1989 Artsakh was legally and de facto part of
Armenia. The naïve performance to present Artsakh as a "separate
party" allegedly created a large scope for diplomatic "maneuver". In
reality, everyone knows the obvious reality that Artsakh is just a
region of Armenia with a special status.
Will the Minsk Group-mediated negotiations continue?
These negotiations following the ceasefire cannot be effective because
they have been originally based on legal and political self-limitations
by the Armenian official diplomacy and other vicious premises. Hence,
it is not accidental that proposals on settlement were not only
unbeneficial for Armenia also would lead to de facto capitulation
and a national catastrophe. The alternative is clear - as a result
of the failure in the genocidal war perpetrated by Azerbaijan
against Artsakh the current status quo has been established. Vast
territories that used to be populated with Armenians and belong to
Armenians historically and legally are now out of our control. There
was redistribution of the Armenian and Azeri population in accordance
with the areas of control. Similar resolutions were drafted and legally
set down in 1945 during Europe's post-war regulation in East Prussia,
Pomerania, Silesia and Sudetes, and recently in Bosnia, Croatia,
Kosovo. Azerbaijan should admit the defeat of its genocidal policy and
be happy with our greatest gift to that country, the ceasefire. The
regional geopolitical situation and Armenia's national potential are
enough to have such a position. The conflict over Artsakh, as well as
the Arab-Israeli conflicts defy mechanisms of final settlement. This is
an illusion, "utopia". In the case of such deep and defying historical,
geographic, civilization conflicts, "peace is possible only when
war is impossible". The only guarantee of non-resumption of war and
lasting regional stability is maintenance of general military political
balance. The forces which are not interested in unpredictable wars in
the region are already close to adequate understanding of this reality,
meanwhile, the Armenian ruling elite is usually and strategically late.
I wonder what the people of this region, especially the residents
of Karvachar think about the negotiations which render surrender of
their homes to Azerbaijan possible?
Õ"Õ¡O~@Õ¾Õ¡Õ³Õ¡Õ¼Õ" Õ¢Õ¡Õ¶Õ¯Õ¹Õ¸O~BÕ©ÕµÕ¸O~BÕ¶Õ¨
Õ¬Õ¸O~BÕ®Õ¸O~BÕ´ Õ§ ÕºÕ¡Õ¿Õ¥O~@Õ¡Õ¦Õ´Õ"
Õ¡O~@Õ¤ÕµÕ¸O~BÕ¶O~DÕ¸O~BÕ´ Õ°Õ¡Õ´Õ¡Õ¯Õ¸Õ²Õ´Õ¡Õ¶Õ"Õ¸O~@Õ¥Õ¶
Õ¿Õ¸O~BÕªÕ¡Õ® Õ·O~@Õ"Õ¡Õ¶Õ¸O~BÕ´ Õ¢Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶Õ¸Õ¶ Õ¯ÕµÕ¡Õ¶O~DÕ"
Õ¾Õ¥O~@Õ¡Õ°Õ¡Õ½Õ¿Õ¡Õ¿Õ´Õ¡Õ¶ Õ£Õ¸O~@Õ®Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶ ÕÕ¶Õ¤Õ"O~@Õ¶Õ¥O~@Õ¨:
Õ"Õ¡Õ²Õ¡O~DÕ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶Õ¸O~BÕ©ÕµÕ¡Õ´Õ¢ Õ¡ÕµÕ½Õ¿Õ¥Õ² O~DÕ¹Õ¥O~@Õ¶
Õ¥Õ¶ Õ°Õ¥Õ¿Õ¡O~DO~@O~DO~@Õ¾Õ¸O~BÕ´: Ô"Õ½Õ¯ Õ¨Õ¶Õ¤Õ°Õ¡Õ¶Õ¸O~BO~@
Õ¡Õ¼Õ´Õ¡Õ´Õ¢` Õ¿Õ¡O~@Õ¡Õ®O~DÕ¶Õ¥O~@Õ" Õ°Õ¡Õ¶Õ±Õ¶Õ´Õ¡Õ¶ Õ¶Õ¯Õ¡Õ¿Õ´Õ¡Õ´Õ¢
Õ¾Õ¥O~@Õ¡Õ¢Õ¥O~@Õ´Õ¸O~BÕ¶O~DÕ¨ ÕÕ"Õ½Õ¿ Õ¢Õ¡O~AÕ¡Õ½Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶ Õ§:
Ô"Õ´ Õ¯Õ¸Õ²Õ´Õ"O~A Õ°Õ¡Õ¾Õ¥Õ¬Õ¥Õ´, Õ¸O~@ Õ~@Õ~@ O~G Ô¼Õ~BÕ~@
Õ"Õ·ÕÕ¡Õ¶Õ¸O~BÕ©ÕµÕ¸O~BÕ¶Õ¶Õ¥O~@Õ¨ ÕºÕ¥Õ¿O~D Õ§ Õ¡Õ¶Õ°Õ¡ÕºÕ¡Õ²
Õ¾Õ¥O~@Õ½Õ¯Õ½Õ¥Õ¶ 2007 Õ©Õ¾Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶Õ"O~A O~CÕ¡Õ½Õ¿Õ¡O~AÕ"
Õ¯Õ¥O~@ÕºÕ¸Õ¾ Õ¯Õ¡Õ½Õ¥O~AÕ¾Õ¡Õ® Õ¢Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡O~@Õ¡Õ¶Õ¡ÕµÕ"Õ¶
Õ·Õ"Õ¶Õ¡O~@Õ¡O~@Õ¸O~BÕ©ÕµÕ¸O~BÕ¶Õ¨ Õ¡Õ¦Õ¡Õ¿Õ¡Õ£O~@Õ¾Õ¡Õ®
Õ¿Õ¡O~@Õ¡Õ®O~DÕ¶Õ¥O~@Õ¸O~BÕ´ O~G Õ¾Õ¥O~@Õ¡Õ¢Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯Õ¥O~AÕ´Õ¡Õ¶
O~DÕ¡Õ²Õ¡O~DÕ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶Õ¸O~BÕ©ÕµÕ¡Õ¶Õ¨ Õ°Õ¡Õ²Õ¸O~@Õ¤Õ¥Õ¶
Õ¼Õ¡Õ¦Õ´Õ¡Õ¾Õ¡O~@Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶ Õ¢Õ¶Õ¸O~BÕµÕ© O~G Õ®Õ¡Õ¾Õ¡Õ¬:
Ô±ÕµÕ¬Õ¡ÕºÕ¥Õ½` Õ¶O~@Õ¡Õ¶O~D ÕÕ½Õ¿Õ¡Õ£Õ¸O~BÕµÕ¶Õ½ O~G
Õ°O~@Õ¡ÕºÕ¡O~@Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡ÕµÕ¶Õ¸O~@Õ¥Õ¶ Õ´Õ¥Õ²Õ¡Õ¤O~@Õ¾Õ¥Õ¬Õ¸O~B
Õ¥Õ¶ Õ~@Õ¡ÕµÕ¡Õ½Õ¿Õ¡Õ¶Õ" (Õ~@Õ~@, Ô±O~@O~AÕ¡Õ) Õ¡Õ¦Õ£Õ¡ÕµÕ"Õ¶
Õ¡Õ¶Õ¾Õ¿Õ¡Õ¶Õ£Õ¸O~BÕ©ÕµÕ¡Õ¶ Õ¤Õ¥Õ´ Õ°Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡ÕºÕ¥Õ¿Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶
Õ®Õ¡Õ¶O~@Õ¡Õ£Õ¸O~BÕµÕ¶ Õ°Õ¡Õ¶O~AÕ¡O~D Õ£Õ¸O~@Õ®Õ¥Õ¬Õ¸O~B Õ´Õ¥Õ": Ô"
Õ¤Õ¥Õº, Õ´Õ"Õ¶Õ½Õ¯ÕµÕ¡Õ¶ Õ£Õ¸O~@Õ®Õ¨Õ¶Õ©Õ¡O~AÕ" Õ¾Õ¥O~@Õ"Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶
Õ¿ÕÕ¸O~BO~@ Õ¡O~@Õ¤ÕµÕ¸O~BÕ¶O~DÕ¶Õ¥O~@Õ¶ Õ¡ÕµÕ½ Õ°Õ¡O~@O~AÕ¸O~BÕ´
Õ¶O~@Õ¡Õ¶O~A Õ¸O~@O~GÕ§ Õ¡ÕµÕ¬Õ¨Õ¶Õ¿O~@Õ¡Õ¶O~D Õ¹Õ¥Õ¶ Õ©Õ¸Õ²Õ¶Õ¸O~BÕ´:
The population of Karvachar is coping with the practical problems of
reconstruction of the region vastly damaged by the war. Here, very
few people are interested in politics. The general attitude to the
surrender of territories is negative. I would add on my behalf that
the RoA and NKR authorities need to resume housing construction in the
liberated areas suspended in 2007 and draft and launch a strategy of
the repopulation policy. Otherwise, they will be accused strongly and
publicly for committing the gravest crime against the national security
of Armenia (RoA, Artsakh). By the way, recent miserable results of
the Minsk Group-mediated negotiations allow for no other alternative.