Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Serzh Sargsyan Destroyed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Serzh Sargsyan Destroyed

    SERZH SARGSYAN DESTROYED
    HAKOB BADALYAN

    Story from Lragir.am News:
    http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments24039.html
    Published: 12:36:46 - 02/11/2011

    Actually, Serzh Sargsyan destroyed the government he had built
    in the result of 2008 election, i.e. March 1. No doubt, planning
    the presidential elections, Serzh Sargsyan imagined a different
    government. March 1 ruined all his plans creating a completely new
    internal governmental situation and forcing Serzh Sargsyan adapt to it.

    It is necessary to stress that the point is not about the fact that
    Serzh Sargsyan had an idea of a better, more democratic government.

    No, the point is about a completely different government not related to
    Kocharyan because only such a government would allow Serzh Sargsyan
    being the de facto President of the country with all the social,
    internal governmental and foreign political responsibility stemming
    from it.

    By the way, following the internal governmental replacements, we
    don't need to have the false impression of democratic or legal-civil
    changes. It is clear that the government is under a process of
    formation of transformation which was put off for over 3 years due
    to March 1.

    The intermediate government that has been present in Armenia for over
    3 years seems to be destructing or has already destructed, and Serzh
    Sargsyan's government is coming to replace it. Apparently, the coming
    government will be temporary because the current system in Armenia
    with its essence and quality is unable to ensure a lasting government.

    Serzh Sargsyan understands this fact having a clear idea of the home
    situation and global trends.

    Merely the new temporary government will be Serzh Sargsyan's tactics
    and not the concession to Robert Kocharyan. Sure, Sargsyan needs
    to complete this process, or to bring it to the point after which
    Kocharyan will have to only agree with Sargsyan and stop his evident
    and covert tries to change the situation. But it is obvious that Serzh
    Sargsyan managed to receive the support of the West and Moscow, while
    in case of certain layout of realities in the country, he can also
    get the support of the opposition Armenian National Congress. Congress
    seems to have already voiced its support announcing about the version
    of next elections.

    Ter-Petrosyan, of course, understands no worse the situation and knows
    the government structure better and imagines the deep essence of the
    changes preferring not to intervene and not to become an obstacle. I am
    repeating, I am not saying Armenia and the authorities are becoming
    more democratic and Ter-Petrosyan decided to enjoy this process,
    more, Ter-Petrosyan is not entering a deal with Serzh Sargsyan.

    Merely, assessing the resources of the opposition, the potential of
    public mobilization, and understanding the deep processes happening
    in the government and the external influence on them, which is not a
    secondary factor, Ter-Petrosyan perhaps prefers not assuming the role
    of the unnecessary because if so, he will not better the opposition's
    positions but will only inhibit the internal governmental process.

    But in general, having no direct or indirect connection with the
    public demand on democratization, as well as with the civil interests,
    the current process has positive trends for Armenia in terms of
    public perspectives.

    Building his own government, Serzh Sargsyan cannot but take into
    account the transformations inside the society, the home and foreign
    realities, technological transformations which facilitated the
    destruction of such regimes which were richer than Armenia, in terms
    of stronger self-preservation resources.

    The key issue of the ongoing process is the power but any government
    is based on the features of its time. Any government expresses the
    public atmosphere of its time. Consequently, the society needs to see
    not only a regular internal governmental skirmish that has nothing
    to do with it and just a fight for power, but the impact of its
    transformation on the governmental system.

    Yes, Serzh Sargsyan, sooner or later, had to deal with the
    establishment of his own government, but it depends on the current
    situation in the public atmosphere what government he will establish,
    what moods and trends will prevail or will be no less influential
    than internal governmental trends in this process of establishment
    of government.

    Consequently, the society is not witnessing a show, or not only a show,
    but the result of its legal-civil transformation, its influence.

    This means that the process of public transformations should be kept
    and deepened, deepening the internal governmental chaos, at the same
    time, keeping it under the direct or indirect public control.

Working...
X