Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oil: Analysis - Caucasus pipeline leaves Russia in the cold & Turkey

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Oil: Analysis - Caucasus pipeline leaves Russia in the cold & Turkey

    AKI, Italy
    May 24 2005



    OIL: ANALYSIS - CAUCASUS PIPELINE LEAVES RUSSIA IN THE COLD AND
    TURKEY TO BENEFIT


    Istanbul, 23 May (AKI) - After 12 years of setbacks and disagreements
    the taps are ready to turn on a 2.6 billion-dollar giant pipeline
    which will pump oil from the Caspian Sea to Turkey and on to the
    world's energy markets - a process which stands to sap Moscow of some
    of its influence over the energy resource-rich Caucasus region.
    Billed as the "energy project of the century" the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
    (BTC) pipeline will start operations on Wednesday, its inauguration
    symbolising an end to the bickering between nations and oil companies
    that brought so many delays and changes of plan.

    The 1,774 kilometre pipeline starts in Baku, the captial of
    Azerbaijan, from where an ongoing territorial dispute with
    neighbouring Armenia forced engineers to incorporate a northward
    detour up towards Tbilisi, the capital of Georgia. The structure then
    winds down south through Armenia and onto the Turkish Mediterranean
    port of Ceyhan.

    The new pipeline which starts at Baku's Sangachal terminal and end
    ups running the bulk - some 1,070 kilometres - of its length through
    Turkey, avoids Russian territory altogether.

    This route differs vastly from Russia's original ambitious "northern
    line" project of 1995, which linked the Caspian Sea with the Russian
    Black Sea port of Novorossick, with the pipeline running through the
    Chechen capital, Grozny.

    That route temporarily hooked up with another pipeline, the US-backed
    Baku-Tbilisi-Batumi (Georgia) "western line" but in 1999, the Grozny
    link had to be abandoned following a wave of sabotage attacks by
    Chechen rebels fighting Moscow's rule. An alternative was also needed
    because of the "western line's" modest carrying capacity.

    "Oil and natural gas from Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan, has been
    channeled to markets in the West through Russia. Russia controls the
    volume of exports and dictates the prices," Nadir Devlet, an analyst
    at Istanbul's Yeditepe University, told Adnkronos International
    (AKI).

    "But with the BTC project, Azerbaijani oil production will no longer
    depend on Russian policies," said Devlet, adding that in the long run
    the other former Soviet central Asian republics, Kazakhstan and
    Turkmenistan, may also link up with the project, further isolating
    Moscow.

    "This weakens Russia's position in the energy-rich region. Iran on
    the other hand [which some also view as another of the project's
    major losers] will not be affected by the BTC because for Tehran, the
    priority is to maintain control of Turkmenistan's natural gas exports
    [for which it acts as a conduit]," Devlet explained.

    The BTC pipeline was built by a 11-member consortium led by British
    Petroleum (BP) which owns a 30 percent share. The next largest
    stakeholder is the Azerbaijan State Oil Company, AZNEFT with 25
    percent followed by the Turkish state oil company, TPAO, with 6.5
    percent. Italian energy giant ENI, which has extensive drilling and
    exploration rights Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan

    The BTC's carrying capacity is a staggering 50 million metric tons of
    oil a year, or some 1 million barrels every day. Just to fill its
    length will take five months, with the first oil expected to arrive
    in Ceyhan by the end of the year.

    The BTC's inaguration comes as the oil price continues to hover above
    the 50 dollar a barrel mark. With growing concerns about dwindling
    global reserves expected to keep prices high, the pipeline is seen
    from a market perspective as a welcome boost in supply.

    But the project continues to draw criticism from skeptics who
    question the wisdom of constructing a strategically important
    pipeline through a region as politcally volatile as the southern
    Caucasus.

    Azerbaijan and Armenia's bloody conflict over the enclave of Nagorno
    Karabakh in the mid-1990s remains unresolved and cross-border clashes
    still occur. Georgia's government, installed in 2003 after the "Rose
    Revolution" which toppled the country's pro-Moscow leaders, is
    grappling with break-away movements in the regions of Abkhazia and
    South Ossetia, which are backed by Russia.

    Consortium members have dismissed such arguments, insisting that
    their investment is a safe one.


    (Vahit Bora/Pwm/Aki)
Working...
X