Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Uzbekistan: Dancing as the people die

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Uzbekistan: Dancing as the people die

    Uzbekistan: Dancing as the people die

    The New Statesman
    May 23 2005

    BY JULIAN HOLLOWAY

    I once danced with President Karimov's daughter Lola
    at her nightclub, the Katakomba. After a few seconds
    her bodyguard cut in, and off she went past
    Uzbekistan's elite, her head set like a princess's
    under the flashing lights.
    Since then things have changed in Tashkent. Local news
    reports are heavily censored, but friends in the city
    tell me people on the buses and metros are talking
    openly about the massacre of hundreds of Uzbek
    citizens in the east of the country by security forces
    loyal to Lola's father.
    I have been to Andijan three times in the past few
    years, researching a book on Babur, the first Mughal
    emperor of India.
    The Ferghana Valley was his first kingdom, and as
    Babur's story attests, what happens there can have
    far-reaching consequences.
    In his day, Andijan was famous for its music. It was
    also prosperous from the soil and from trade. But
    Karimov has maintained the Soviet policy of turning
    the valley over to cotton, and has stifled the
    cross-border trade in the interests of `security'. I
    have seen people there living under plastic sheeting
    in the fields. Despite the poverty, Andijan still
    loves its music, and in the tea houses and pavement
    cafés, as in Lola's nightclub, the music is always
    played too loudly.
    Since last summer, the people of the town have been
    deeply uncomfortable about the arrest and trial of 23
    local businessmen: one owns a furniture factory,
    another a private medical centre. The men are
    followers of Akram Yuldashev, a local maths teacher
    who wrote a book, The Path to Faith, about how to live
    a good Muslim life. They are popular because of
    their contributions to a fund distributing significant
    sums of their money to causes such as an orphanage.
    Religiously motivated actions of any kind are very
    dangerous in Uzbekistan. Many more of Yuldashev's
    followers, or `Akramiya', as the
    government has branded them, have been arrested in
    Tashkent. Men from the SNB, the Uzbek version of the
    old KGB, are said to have taken their cars and
    computers. Andijan has long been a town of fear, with
    its prison sitting like a monument to
    state terror between the town centre and the municipal
    gardens on the outskirts. I remember asking a man in a
    conspicuously empty museum in a fine, 19thcentury
    religious building what it had been. He replied that
    it had been a madrasa - `before the Wahhabis
    disappeared'.
    `Wahhabi' was the earliest of a series of labels
    designed to confuse pious Uzbek Muslims with armed
    militants. After the `Wahhabis' came `Hizb ut-Tahrir',
    and then `the Akramiya'. I wonder whether Yuldashev,
    who is in prison in Tashkent, will be seen again.
    Andijan is also pious and independent. Tension has
    been growing in the town since the start of the trial
    of the 23, fuelled by their hunger strike. On the
    night of 12 May, a group of townspeople stormed the
    jail and supporters of the 23 crowded into Babur
    Square, a great crossroads divided with lawns between
    whitewashed stones. When, two days later, I saw a
    photograph of bodies swathed in white sheets, I
    recognised the building as the unspeakable old hotel
    in which I once stayed. All around Babur Square,
    hiding behind the façade of Soviet town planning, is
    an old town of courtyard houses where pomegranate and
    apricot trees grow. The security forces have been
    breaking down doors in the city, looking for the
    ringleaders.
    Who is really to blame for this atrocity? As always in
    central Asia, that depends on whom you ask. The people
    of Andijan say they were protesting against poverty
    and injustice. After his return from `taking personal
    control of the situation', Karimov declared: `Members
    of the Akramiya, which is a new sect of the Hizb
    ut-Tahrir, have organised this disorder.' There
    certainly are Uzbek militants, but the Akramiya are
    not these.
    The next time Lola Karimova goes dancing, perhaps it
    will be in Moscow, in exile. But how many will have
    died before then?


    Email: [email protected]

    PHOTO CAPTION: A bloody response: supporters of the teacher Akram Yuld
Working...
X