Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Open Communications Without Settlement?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Open Communications Without Settlement?

    OPEN COMMUNICATIONS WITHOUT SETTLEMENT?
    Naira Hayrumyan

    Story from Lragir.am News:
    http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments25691.html
    Published: 12:40:11 - 04/04/2012

    At least one new trend has emerged in the Karabakh issue settlement -
    Hillary Clinton's and Ahmed Davutoglu's intention to hold a meeting
    between Serzh Sargsyan and Ilham Aliyev.

    Foreign Minister of Armenia Edward Nalbandyan, when asked about this
    at the press conference with his Cyprian counterpart, said the U.S.

    plays a constructive role in the negotiations on Karabakh and there
    can be no word on Turkey's mediation.

    Armenia's position is clear. Is the U.S. really going to involve
    Turkey into the Karabakh issue settlement? According to the Turkish
    press, Hillary Clinton, who arrived in Turkey, preferred avoiding
    the Armenian issue. But maybe, based precisely on such a meeting,
    the Turkish press stated that if Russia and the United States persuade
    Armenia, Turkey will talk to Azerbaijan.

    Why do we need such a meeting?

    Perhaps, the U.S. is trying to catch up the initiative of the Karabakh
    issue with the help of Turkey and make an unexpected step: the American
    co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group Robert Bradtke said that the parties
    are closer to the settlement than they think. This means that some
    scenario is being set up which is not openly discussed.

    EU Commissioner for Enlargement Stefan Fule made an interesting
    statement in this connection in Baku. He said that the EU does not
    propose settlement but only preparation of peoples to peace and
    building of trust measures. So, we should understand that the EU
    proposes open communications without final settlement.

    Azerbaijan supports such "settlement" - the Head of the Azerbaijan's
    foreign agency said that he agrees with the so-called pre-settlement.

    True, he noted at the same time, that Armenia should withdraw troops
    from the "occupied" areas.

    But the point is that the essence of the Karabakh issue is these
    regions. If they are surrendered, the settlement will have no meaning
    for Armenians since it will be equal to capitulation and suicide. The
    Western leaders will hardly fail to understand this and they hardly
    hope that the Armenians will commit massive suicide. So, they try
    to persuade Azerbaijan to agree with the opening of communications
    under the current status quo.

    But, Baku and Ankara are trying to seize the maximum possible benefit.

    They want to do all through Russia: Russian foreign minister Sergey
    Lavrov said in Yerevan and Baku that Russia will support such
    settlement when "after the return of some regions and opening of a
    corridor, the status quo will be set up. Though, perhaps, Lavrov said
    this to keep the Armenian party far from concessions.

    These attempts will hardly come true just like the efforts to replace
    France with the European Union in the OSCE Minsk Group. Fule said in
    Baku that the European Union is not going to substitute France.

    The Armenian party needs to insist on its positions and not yield.

    Because if Armenia keeps its positions firm, the world powers,
    interested in the opening of communications, will find a way to
    pressure Azerbaijan. If not, we don't lose anything and remain as
    it is.



    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X