Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It's Wrong To Think That Recognition Of Armenian Genocide ConcernsOn

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • It's Wrong To Think That Recognition Of Armenian Genocide ConcernsOn

    IT'S WRONG TO THINK THAT RECOGNITION OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE CONCERNS ONLY ARMENIANS: CHRISTIAN DER-STEPANIAN

    STRASBOURG, MAY 30, NOYAN TAPAN. Ambassador Christian Der-Stepanian,
    the resident representative of the Republic of Armenia to the Council
    of Europe, made a speech at the May 25 meeting of the Ministers'
    delegates of the Council of Europe. The speech was dedicated to the
    Armenian-Turkish relations and in some sense, it was a response to
    Turkey's Prime Minister Erdogan's speech made on the second day of
    the Warsaw summit where the latter accused the parliaments of the
    countries having recognized the Genocide of ceding to the pressure
    of Armenian lobbying. Below is Christian Der-Stepanian's speech
    (with some reductions), which was submitted to Noyan Tapan from
    the Press Service of the State Commission on organization of events
    dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide: "Turkey's
    Prime Minister's words, particularly, refusal of the recognition
    of the fact of the Armenian Genocide, show what way Turkey must
    still pass to fulfil the mandatory affair of remembering which is
    so important for democratic development of any society. Accusing of
    Turkish University students, who undertook a conference concerning
    the Armenian Genocide, of betrayal by Turkish Justice Minister is
    the sad evidence of that. In contrary with Erdogan's estimation
    made in Warsaw, it would be wrong to think that the parliaments of
    11 member countries of the Council of Europe having recognized the
    Armenian Genocide did it under a pressure. They did it consciously
    and dilligently, considering that such a recognition corresponds
    to Europe's idea of human rights, which is based on the respect of
    peoples' memory. And today they must feel themselves more strong in
    their conviction, also taking into account the voice inside Turkey,
    rising in some political and intellectual circles, which calls their
    authorities to do thier duty of remembering. It will be also wrong
    to think that the issue of recognition concerns only Armenians of
    all over the world while it is a phenomenon of political life of the
    interested states and unification of civil society's actors aimed at
    the fact that the recognition should really respond the universal
    demand of justice and dignity. Today, prompted from the prospect
    of opening negotiations on membership to the European Union, the
    Turkey's Prime Minister calls on to create a commission of historians,
    while evidences of those within a hair's breadth of death and foreign
    observers (diplomates, representatives of humanitarian missions),
    historians' works amd comparison of demographic data (more than 2
    mln Armenians living in the Ottaman Empire before the World War I,
    not hardly 60 thousand in present Turkey) are already enough to
    prove the fact and volume of the Genocide. We think from our side
    the present and future of relations between Armenia and Turkey are
    in the sphere of responsibilities of the two countries' authorities
    and are not a work for historians' counsul. Today, in reality, it is
    important not to limit oneself facing the past but just the opposite,
    to discuss issues of the present and turn to future. That's why
    we think that opening of borders without preconditions will be the
    first significant step for establishing bilateral relations. It will
    be accompanied by establishment of a dialogue within the framework
    of an intergovernmental commission to be created on that purpose:
    just that commission will discuss and solve all those issues which
    are still problematic among our countries."
Working...
X