Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline: another West-East fault line -

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline: another West-East fault line -

    Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline: another West-East fault line - Part 2

    TDN
    Friday, June 3, 2005

    OPINIONS

    K. Gajendra SINGH

    Ilham Aliyev's late father Haydar, popularly called Baba (father)
    of the nation and Azerbaijan's ruler for nearly three decades,
    can be considered the major brain behind the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
    (BTC) pipeline. Before dying at the end of 2003 in a U.S. medical
    clinic, he ensured succession for his 41-year-old son in presidential
    elections that were disputed by opposition leaders at home and others
    outside. Both the United states and Russia acquiesced because, with
    the Middle East in turmoil, stability in the Caspian Basin was vital
    with its vast energy resources.

    Born in the Nakhichevan enclave adjoining Turkey, Haydar Aliyev
    was brought to Moscow in 1982 after a successful career in the KGB
    in Azerbaijan and became the first Muslim member of the Politburo,
    almost reaching the very top. But Mikhail Gorbachev, who took over in
    1985 and ushered in the unclearly thought out policies of Perestroika
    and Glasnost, dismissed Aliyev in 1987 for opposing the reforms.

    But after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Azerbaijan declared
    independence like other Soviet republics. The wily and resilient
    Aliyev, now donning the mantle of nationalism, denounced Soviet
    intervention in Baku and re-emerged from Nakhichevan. He soon muscled
    his way to become president in June 1993. Among his many admirers,
    neither Georgia's Eduard Sheverdnadzde nor Uzbek President Islam
    Karimov have been as successful as Aliyev, who established dynastic
    rule.

    This writer, accredited to Baku, recalls his meetings with Aliyev
    during 1993-96 when Aliyev was still trying to find his feet and
    acquire legitimacy at home and respectability abroad. Because of
    his KGB background, the West treated him like a pariah. Neither Iran
    nor Turkey -- as his predecessor was very pro-Turkish -- were happy
    at his return. Aliyev had bad vibes with Boris Yeltsin and opposed
    Russian defense installations in Azerbaijan. Aliyev met with Russian
    President Yeltsin and soothed Turkey's fears, having established
    friendly relations with President Suleyman Demirel.

    Aliyev also knew many in the Indian leadership from his Moscow days
    where he received them as a senior party member, a success story from
    one of the Turkic-speaking republics with historic linkages and ties
    to India. To break out from his isolation, Aliyev was ready to fly
    to India on short notice. He tried frantically to establish contacts
    with Western leaders, almost anyone.

    Like the Baku-born chess player Garry Kasparov, Aliyev moved
    stealthily and aggressively if required. He would turn up in
    Istanbul and elsewhere for meetings with Western leaders, and finally
    succeeded. He also courted Israel (there were still 100,000 Jews in
    Azerbaijan; 50,000 had migrated to Israel), which was happy to have
    a watch post in Baku over Iran in the south. Iran has twice as many
    Turkic-speaking Shiite Azeris as Azerbaijan. Israeli Prime Minister
    Benjamin Netanyahu even visited Baku.

    Aliyev's contacts with Israel and European leaders paved the way
    for direct contacts with the Americans, especially the powerful
    Jewish lobby, to counteract the influential Armenian diaspora in
    United States. He seduced the U.S.-led West to his side in the new
    Great Game of acquiring and controlling scarce energy resources. In
    September 1995, a $7.4 billion deal with an oil consortium led by BP
    to exploit Azerbaijan's extensive energy resources laid the foundations
    for the BTC.

    Aliyev was a stunning success in Washington. During his 1997 visit
    to the United States he met with President Bill Clinton and signed
    oil deals with U.S. oil giants worth nearly $10 billion. More
    than 400 American VIPs, including many senior officials such as
    former secretaries of state and defense, lobbyists, consultants,
    investors and facilitators, lined up for a $250-per-plate banquet
    in his honor. In a few years from being a pariah, Aliyev had become
    a U.S. darling. Verily, the qualities to reach the top rung in any
    system are perhaps not so different.

    Under Aliyev a new constitution was approved in 1995. He brought
    stability and peace to Azerbaijan; a cease-fire with Armenia signed
    in 1994 still holds. He enacted economic reforms that brought massive
    foreign investment. The BTC project to transport Caspian Basin oil
    to the Mediterranean began under him.

    Apart from the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and the
    Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), Azerbaijan joined
    the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE),
    the Council of Europe and other Western organizations. Baku also
    expressed a desire to join NATO. In the illegal U.S. war on Iraq,
    Azerbaijan sided with Washington.

    Baku, located on the Caspian Sea, was an important stop on the old
    silk routes. It produced half of the world's oil at the turn of the
    last century. It has a rich past and a cosmopolitan culture with its
    opera houses and fine buildings. It became the center of the Soviet
    oil industry and many Indians were trained here.

    But in November 1993 it looked gray, bleak and depressing when we
    -- five ambassadors based in Ankara -- went there to present our
    credentials to Aliyev. Conditions improved as investments flowed in,
    but disparities still remain. This writer saw Afghan war-experienced
    mujahaddin, flown in on Pakistani planes to fight in the enclave
    of Nagorno-Karabakh, swaggering in the hotel lobbies. They proved
    expensive and rather ineffective mercenaries against Russian-armed
    Armenian Nagorno-Karabakh forces.

    For South Asians, especially Parsees, there is Atishgah -- a
    fire-worship temple near Baku. The present complex opened in the 17th
    century and was used up to the mid-19th century, but the original
    Atishgah goes back to very ancient times. From time immemorial
    natural gas has seeped out of the earth and catches on fire. Aryans
    and Parsees, both Indo-Iranians, worshipped fire. Parsees in India
    still do so, as Hindus worship Agni (fire). The Azerbaijani foreign
    minister told this writer that Azerbaijan was known as Aagban, which
    means "forest of fire" or "arrow of fire." The temple claimed many
    miraculous powers, bringing happiness and well being to visitors
    and devotees alike. Located on the silk route, many Indian traders
    -- Parsees, Punjabis, Gujaratis and others -- started visiting the
    temple and built Dharamshala-like rooms to stay in. An elderly lady
    in charge at Atishgh told this writer that Jawaharlal Nehru and his
    daughter Indira Gandhi had once visited.

    An Indian restaurant, Caravansaray, also operated in the city in
    the 19th century. Pepe Escobar, a recent visitor to Baku, wrote:
    "The only other flourishing industry in the Caucasus, apart from oil,
    is kidnapping. Not to mention Kristina, the top belly-dancer at the
    Karavanserai, a favorite restaurant of the oil oligarchy, who is in
    a class all by herself."

    Next door to Daghestan and Chechnya, Azerbaijan is a centerpiece in
    the strategic multiethnic and potentially explosive mosaic called
    the Caucasus. Azerbaijan and Georgia are essential for the transport
    of gas and petroleum to the West via Turkey or the Black Sea and the
    Balkans from not only the Caspian Basin but also from Central Asian
    republics such as Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan.

    Conclusion:

    The 1973 oil price crisis surely did not compel the United States to
    use energy as efficiently as the Europeans and the Japanese did.

    Neither did the United States invest heavily to find other energy
    alternatives. Instead, it has tried to acquire a stronghold over
    energy resources around the world by bribing presidents in Central
    Asia, Africa and Latin America.

    Former Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, now president of
    the World Bank, boasted soon after the Iraqi invasion and "mission
    accomplished" that Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and other
    accusations were just bureaucratic excuses for controlling Iraqi
    oil. Former UK Environment Minister Michael Meacher recently told Al
    Jazeera in Lisbon, "The reason they [United States] attacked Iraq has
    nothing to do with weapons of mass destruction, it has nothing to do
    with democracy in Iraq, it has nothing to do with the human rights
    abuses of Saddam Hussein."

    "It was principally, totally and comprehensively because of oil,"
    Meacher continued. "This was about assuming control over the Middle
    East and over Iraq, the second largest producer, and also over Saudi
    Arabia next door. It was about securing as much as possible of the
    remaining supplies of oil and also over supplies in the Caspian Basin."

    Meacher also added that the United States had poor environmental
    standards. "American power plants waste more energy than is needed
    to run the whole Japanese economy," he said. "They have set their
    face against the Kyoto protocol."

    UK Labour Party MP George Galloway, while putting to the sword false
    accusations against him of money transactions with Saddam Hussein,
    instead accused a U.S. Senate Subcommittee of creating the mother
    of all "smokescreens" to hide an unaccounted disappearance of
    $8.8 billion of Iraqi oil revenues under the rule in Iraq of Paul
    Bremer, the first U.S. viceroy to Baghdad and a symbol of a wastage
    of hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars in a war that has
    become a quagmire for the United States.

    It should be a lesson for the pawns in the Caspian Basin. The BTC
    pipeline will become just another fault line between East and West
    for control of energy sources with Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey
    playing crucial roles.

    This is a region of uneven topography and ethnic and other fault
    lines, and the pipeline would only exacerbate them. There are two
    breakaway provinces in Georgia having close relations to Russia. If
    the Muslim Chechens, who are now fighting Russia with Georgia not
    checking them, decide to take on the United States, they could
    sabotage the pipeline. The same jihadis who fought against Soviet
    Russia to help the United States avenge its humiliation in Vietnam
    also bombed U.S. missions in Kenya and Tanzania and were responsible
    for the Sept. 11 attacks. Baku, with tense relations with Moscow and
    Tehran in the South, can be infiltrated to create instability. The
    pipeline passes through turbulent Kurdish regions of Turkey. In spite
    of Kurds in Turkey having recently gained many rights, the situation
    remains tense in its Kurdish regions. It is not likely to be helped
    if Iraq starts unraveling, which cannot be ruled out considering
    Iraqi Kurdistan becoming autonomous, if not independent.

    K. Gajendra Singh, served as Indian ambassador to Turkey and Azerbaijan
    in 1992-96. Prior to that, he served as ambassador to Jordan (during
    the 1990-91 Gulf war), Romania and Senegal. He is currently chairman
    of the Foundation for Indo-Turkic Studies. The views expressed here
    are his own. E-mail: [email protected]
Working...
X