Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Association Withdraws Award to U.S. Envoy John Evans

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Association Withdraws Award to U.S. Envoy John Evans

    Washington Post, DC
    June 9 2005

    Association Withdraws Award to U.S. Envoy
    Ambassador Was to Be Honored for Dissent

    By Glenn Kessler
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Thursday, June 9, 2005; Page A19

    The American Foreign Service Association recently announced that John
    M. Evans, the U.S. ambassador to Armenia, was to receive a
    prestigious award for "constructive dissent" for characterizing as
    genocide the deaths of 1.5 million Armenians in the waning days of
    the Ottoman Empire in 1915. His comments stirred such a diplomatic
    tempest that Evans not only had to retract his remarks but also had
    to later clarify his retraction.

    Earlier this week, however, the selection committee met again and
    decided to withdraw the honor, known as the Christian A. Herter
    Award. They decided not to offer any award in the category, reserved
    for a senior foreign service officer. Other awards are issued for
    officers at lower levels.

    The timing of the association's decision appeared curious, given it
    came just before Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan arrived
    in Washington for a meeting with President Bush to bolster strained
    U.S.-Turkish relations. John W. Limbert, president of the
    association, said that no one at the organization can remember an
    award being withdrawn after it had been announced.

    "It is not something we do easily," he said.

    The award is intended to foster creative thinking and intellectual
    courage within the State Department bureaucracy, and the secretary of
    state usually attends the award ceremony. One of last year's awards,
    for instance, went to a mid-level foreign service officer who sent a
    cable challenging the administration's policy in Iraq. "Dissent is
    supposed to be controversial," Limbert said.

    Speaking to an Armenian group in California, Evans referred to the
    "Armenian genocide" and said that the U.S. government owes "you, our
    fellow citizens, a more frank and honest way of discussing the
    problem." He added that "there is no doubt in my mind what happened"
    and it was "unbecoming of us, as Americans, to play word games here."

    Armenian groups hailed his comment, noting Evans was the first U.S.
    official since President Ronald Reagan in 1981 to refer to the
    Armenian deaths as genocide. But the comments infuriated Turkey.
    Evans issued a statement saying U.S. policy, in which the United
    States "acknowledges the tragedy" and encourages "scholarly, civil
    society and diplomatic discussion" of the event, had not changed.

    Evans said he used the term "genocide" in "my personal capacity"
    during "informal meetings" and "this was inappropriate." After more
    complaints from Turkey, Evans corrected the statement a day later and
    removed a reference to genocide, instead calling it "the Armenian
    tragedy."

    Limbert said the committee, made up of current and former State
    Department officials, concluded that the award to Evans did not meet
    the selection criteria. He declined to comment further, saying State
    Department officials would have to explain their concerns.

    L. Bruce Laingen, who chaired the selection committee, said "very
    serious people from the State Department in particular" expressed
    concern about the award to Evans. But he said they did not raise
    political issues. Instead, he said, they focused on the fact that the
    award criteria specifically says the actions must be taken while
    "working in the system"; Evans made his comments in speeches.

    "Dissent has to be within the system," Laingen said. He said the
    committee did not focus on that fact until it was reminded by the
    State Department.

    But when the committee decided to withdraw the award, it was faced
    with a dilemma. The committee had received only two nominations, and
    it had already concluded the other nominee did not meet the criteria.
    So no award could be offered.

    Laingen said the committee generally receives few examples of dissent
    at senior levels of the agency. "That is regrettable," he said. "It
    does not reflect well on the foreign service broadly at that level
    for dissent within the system."
    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X