Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

There are still no forces and factors in Armenia able to hinder the

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • There are still no forces and factors in Armenia able to hinder the

    Ruben Mehrabyan: There are still no forces and factors in Armenia able
    to hinder the attempt of authorities to reproduce
    Interview of expert of Armenian Centre for Political and International
    Studies Ruben Mehrabyan with ArmInfo news agency

    by Ashot Safaryan

    arminfo
    Friday, August 24, 12:43


    Mr Mehrabyan, one will hardly doubt about the victory of the ruling
    party in the local government bodies in Armenia,. What instruments may
    be used by the Republican Party of Armenia and how much success will
    promote strengthening of the RPA during the presidential election?


    The forthcoming local elections in Armenia are a kind of an entree to
    the upcoming presidential elections. Moreover, the authorities will
    use these elections to reinforce their positions and, eventually, to
    remain at power after the presidential elections. At the moment I
    observe no obstacles in the way of the authorities' plans.

    The position of the Armenian National Congress has declined much for
    the last period of time. Will it found any stimulus or circumstances
    on the threshold of the presidential election, able give an impulse
    and the "second breath" to this force?


    There are a lot of external and internal reasons for that. For
    instance, the Armenian National Congress (ANC), which has been
    considering itself a titular opposition for a long time, is currently
    experiencing degradation. The ANC has passed numerous points of no
    return, thereby destroying any opportunity for a "second breath". The
    ANC has already become

    bureaucratized, has considerably shrunk and ceased to be the force
    that could form the domestic political agenda. Consequently, the
    logic of the domestic political process will be maintained unless any
    force majeure situations occur. And I am deeply sorry to say that.
    The expected victory of the ruling party at the local and presidential
    elections demonstrates the bogginess of the state system, not its
    firmness. And this shows the institutional weakness of the state, the
    decline of the foreign political potential, as well as the potential
    of resistance to challenges faced and to be faced by our state.

    The oppositionally tuned society in Armenia has not disappeared and
    the grounds and reasons of the opposition mood have been also
    preserved, as in fact the authorities did nothing to turn the promises
    into reality. Not setting up of the new parties but formation of the
    civil society able to attract wide layers of the society is needed to
    give a systemized nature to this displeasure and direct it to the
    needed direction. It is impossible to improve the situation in the
    country without a serious civil society and without active reaction at
    the relevant political problems.

    Have all the rest political forces which more or less confront to the
    ruling party already agreed to the reality mentioned by you or there
    will be brave persons which will display true confrontation to the
    authorities in the attempt to regenerate?

    I think there will be some resistance to the authorities' plans, that
    resistance will be of a local nature. One should hardly speak of any
    possible centralized resistance. When I

    speak of the power, I am not inclined to separate the Prosperous
    Armenia Party (PAP) from the Republican Party of Armenia. These are
    just the two faces of the same ruling party. The PAP's attempts to
    distance itself from the RPA, as well as its statements that it is an
    "alternative" force are nothing but pre-electoral populism, just a
    trick aimed at misleading the voters who cannot make sense of the
    backstage political games or show no interest in these processes.

    Let's talk about public movements and initiatives which raise hopes
    for improvement of the public and political regime, as many people
    think.

    Although the fight of the public movements for making responsible the
    persons guilty for the incident at Harsnaqar restaurant and the
    protest against development of the Tekhut deposit are local and
    spontaneous initiatives, nevertheless, these initiatives are evidence
    of a significant potential of our citizens which has not been used
    yet. The only thing I am scared of is shortage of time which won't be
    enough till the forthcoming presidential election. Nevertheless, we
    must not be idle. We should act every day and every hour. We should
    also take into consideration that the share of frustration and evil is
    much in the society. I would not like them to result in any inadequate
    situations and actions.

    Can nomination of a single opposition candidate at the presidential
    election neutralize a little bit consequences of the bogginess and
    bureaucratization of the opposition forces?

    The nomination of a single opposition candidate at the presidential
    elections in Armenia is unable to neutralize the consequences of the
    bogginess and bureaucratization of the opposition forces. The
    current institutional crisis in Armenia affects the parties. We speak
    about democracy, about the fight for democracy, but at the same time
    we have parties, where, figuratively saying, absolute and even
    "theocratic" monarchy is ruling. Thus, it becomes senseless to speak
    of the fight for democracy with such tools. When speaking of
    democracy, one should simply start changing oneself. Armenia needs a
    wider, non-partisan format, which sets itself a goal to change the
    whole structure of state governance, i.e. the oligarchic, clan system
    of monopolism. Moreover, I believe that the presidential system of
    governing in Armenia starts hindering the development of democracy and
    the civil society. The presidential model of governance lays the bases
    of this "absolute monarchy".

    We need a parliamentary system of governance. Some countries of the
    former USSR are gradually switching to that system. They start
    "diluting" the institute of presidential power. We see it in Moldova
    and Georgia. I think Armenia also needs such "dilution" of the
    presidential power and introduction of a system of counterbalances.
    And in this matter I see a great potential for reaching a civil and
    political consensus on dismantling the oligarchic system.

Working...
X