Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

From Ankara To Tehran; The "Persian-Ottoman" Rivalry Is Back

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • From Ankara To Tehran; The "Persian-Ottoman" Rivalry Is Back

    FROM ANKARA TO TEHRAN; THE "PERSIAN-OTTOMAN" RIVALRY IS BACK
    by Yeghig Tashjian

    New Eastern Politics
    Aug 29 2012

    Turkish-Iranian rivalry goes back centuries, to the Ottoman sultans
    and Persian shahs. The tensions somehow decreased in the 20th century
    due to Turkey's isolationist foreign policy which left a power
    vacuum in the Middle East. As AKP reached to power in Turkey and the
    country's economic and political influence grew in the region and as
    the Sunni-Baathists were overthrown from Iraq and in the absence of
    united Arab front against Israel, two regional countries tried to shape
    the balance of power in the region. As the Arab Uprising broke up,
    Iran and Turkey tried to contain each other and they turned Syria to
    chess table, these tensions lead to the emergence of so called a new
    "Sunni and Shia axis". Therefore in order to assume the geopolitical
    borders of the post-Arab Uprising one should ask and see what are the
    cards that these two countries can play, on the domestic and regional
    level, to deter each other and how costly and dangerous can it be to
    both of them and others?

    Among the numerous treaties between Persia and Ottoman Turkey, the
    Treaty of Zuhab of 1639 is usually considered as the most important
    one, as it fixed present Turkey-Iran and Iraq-Iran borders and crated
    a balance of power between the two Middle Eastern giants in the
    region. As this balance started to shake after the Arab Uprising,
    the neo-Ottomans and neo-Persians started to redraw the political
    map of the New Middle East, therefore the clash of interests between
    the two rivals is inevitable, both of them can use dangerous cards
    against each other that could threaten their domestic stability and
    regional hegemony.

    In August 2011, Turkish-Armenian columnist, Markar Esayan, in his
    article "Iran Pulls the PKK Card" interpreted Iran's message to Turkey
    as follows: "To Turkey, you have a dominant role in the uprisings
    in Syria, which is an indispensable ally to us in the region. If you
    try to put pressure on Syria or start an operation against the Syrian
    regime, we [Iran] will be strongly involved in the game with the PKK.

    In regards to the PKK issue, we are capable of capturing its leader
    and eliminating its activities; but we are also capable of making it
    grow... If you give up on Syria, we will deal with the PKK together;
    otherwise, we will become allies with the PKK."[1] One of the cards
    that Iran can use against Turkey on domestic level is the PKK card,
    although this card sometimes can be dangerous because it may reflect
    negatively on Iran too, since Iranian Kurds are also seen as a threat
    to Iran's territorial integrity. During the last decade Turkey and
    Iran signed many agreements in order to help each other to fight
    against Kurdish separatist movements. Things relatively changed as the
    Turkish government started to support and arm the Syrian opposition;
    Iran started to play the chess and used the PKK card as a pressure
    on Turkey. In August 2012 Turkish Daily Hurriyet News published news
    about the bomb that exploded in Turkish city Gazianteb that that killed
    nine and injured 68 and quoted Hussein Nakavi, a spokesman for an
    Iranian national security and foreign policy commission "Perhaps the
    support of Turkey has not just been causing the deaths of innocent
    people in Syria but has also been endangering its own security,"
    and added "Turkey is experiencing internal crises now. Ankara has
    to try to solve its own internal affairs instead of interfering and
    giving hostile statements to Syria."[2]

    distribution of Alawites and Kurds in Turkey

    What else can Iran do against Turkey? On the regional level Iran
    lost in Bahrain, though still holding Iraq and Lebanon, but its
    strategic ally the Syrian regime is in alarm, if Iran loses Syria,
    the game will be over for the "Shia axis". Thus Iran by the help of
    the Assad regime can support the Turkish Alawites in Iskenderun region;
    Alawits make up about 15% of the population in Turkey, while in Hatay
    province they make about half the population[3], mostly seculars and
    pro-Syrian regime, Turkish Alawites will join the secular opposition
    Turkish Republican People's Party (CHP), thus Erdogan's government may
    shake and be accused of sectarianism, once again Erdogan's nightmare
    will come to reality, and the seculars will rise again against their
    government. As Turkey's domestic stability is shaken the country
    will not have enough resources to act in regional issues and its
    hegemony may diminish. Moreover, in November 2011, shortly after
    Turkey agreed to host an early warning radar as part of NATO's missile
    defense system, General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, the head of the Iranian
    Revolutionary Guards' aerospace division, stated that "should we be
    threatened, we will target NATO's missile defense shield in Turkey and
    then hit the next targets." Furthermore, Ali-Akbar, senior adviser to
    Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, argued that Turkey's
    model of "secular Islam" was a version of western liberal democracy
    and unacceptable for countries going through an "Islamic awakening."[4]

    Competition over Syria has also mobilized fault lines in Iraq, where
    Turkey and Iran have supporting opposing camps Since Iraq's first
    democratic elections in 2005, Iran has supported the Shiite-backed
    Dawa party of Nuri al-Maliki, while Turkey has backed the secular
    pan-Iraqi movement of Ayad Allawi. After 2010 elections, al-Maliki
    formed a government, scoring a victory for Iran. In an interview
    with al-Hurra television, al-Maliki said: "Turkey is unfortunately
    playing a role which may lead to disaster and civil war in the region,
    and Turkey itself will suffer because it has different sects and
    ethnicities"[5].Turkey and Iran have also had competing interests in
    Bahrain, where Iran supported the protestors (mainly Shi'as),while
    Turkey has come out in support of the Sunni al-Khalifa monarchy with
    whom it hopes to pursue closer economic ties (In this case Turkey and
    Iran were in a hypocritical position the first opposing democratic
    change and the other supporting it unlike in Syria).

    What are Turkey's choices? What cards can the neo-Ottomans play? The
    presence of 14 million ethnic Azeri in Iran[6] which is considered
    Southern Azerbaijan by the Baku (Azerbaijan's capital) government
    has caused a great deal of friction between Tehran and Baku. Iran
    has tried to suppress secessionist tendencies encouraged by the
    pro-Turkish Baku government. Since the 1990's Iran has sided with
    Armenia in its conflict with Azerbaijan. Turkey on the other hand,
    has close cultural and historical ties with Azerbaijan; it has backed
    Azerbaijan politically, and has strong commercial ties with it.

    Meanwhile, according to Today's Zaman newspaper representatives of
    Iranian Azeris have announced the establishment of an "International
    South Azerbaijani Turks' National Council," which ultimately aims to
    become independent from Iran. "Our ultimate aim is the independence
    of Turks living in 'Southern Azerbaijan.' But we seek independence by
    democratic, peaceful means, not through the use of weapons," Cemal
    Mehmethanoglu, the spokesperson of the council, declared at a press
    conference held at the Azerbaijani Cultural Association in Ankara[7].

    Furthermore the Israeli-Azeri military agreements alarmed the Islamic
    Republic of Iran, therefore if Iranian Azeris succeeded to rebel and
    fulfilled their dream of succession from Iran, the later will enter
    into an era of chaos since the Kurds in the North-west, and the Baloch
    in the South will join the Azeris and Iran's territorial integrity will
    be in question. On the regional ground, Turkey by the help of Western
    powers and Arab Gulf states will surround Iran and impose diplomatic
    pressure, already the Lebanese government is in weak position and
    the al-Maliki government in Iraq is in tension with the Sunnis and
    the Kurds, thus Iran's allies in the region are losing ground and the
    battle for Syria, which turned into a proxy war, will determine the
    political border of the "New Middle East". On the other hand Ankara
    needs to regain its balance among its neighbors; Turkish FM Davutoglu's
    so called "zero-problem" foreign policy already turned into somehow
    "zero-relation" policy especially with Syria, Iraq and Iran.

    Therefore the struggle between the Ottomans and Persians once again
    will shape the region, it may take long and turn into a bloody path but
    in the end no one will be are able to overcome on the other because
    both of them are composed of multiethnic communities and both need
    each other to promote peace in the region. Both countries are slowly
    showing their hands in the region's oldest power game, the Ottoman
    and Persian struggle is once again in front of our doors. But in the
    Middle East there is no room for a "sultan of sultans" or a "shah of
    shahs", there should be both a sultan and a shah.

    Yeghig Tashjian

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [1]MarkarEsayan, "Iran Pulls the PKK Card",
    http://www.todayszaman.com/columnist-253915-iran-pulls-the-pkk-card.html,
    16 August, 2011

    [2] Gaziantep bomb the result of Turkey's anti-Damascus stance:
    Iranian official, www.hurriyetdailynews.com, 22 August, 2012

    [3] "In one of Turkey's most religiously diverse
    provinces, close ties with Syria fuel support for Assad regime",
    http://www.pro.org/stories/world/middle-east/in-one-of-turkey-s-most-religiously-diverse-provinces-close-ties-with-syria-fuel-support-for-assad-regime-9308.html
    , 11/4/2012

    [4] McCurdy Daphne, Danforth Nick,
    "Turkey and Iran: A Fraying Relationship or Business as
    Usual?",http://mideast.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/02/28/turkey_and_iran_a_fraying_relationship_or_business _as_usual?hidecomments=yes,
    11/4/2012

    [5] "Iraqi PM Slams Turkey's 'interference'
    ",http://www.presstv.ir/detail/221333.html, 17/2/2012

    [6] Nadir Devlet , "Turkey and Greater Azerbaijan:A Card to Play?",
    German Marshall Fund of US, July 24,2012

    [7] "Iranian Azeris set up
    national council in Turkey,aspire for independence",
    http://www.todayszaman.com/news-280353-iranian-azeris-set-up-national-council-in-turkey-aspire-for-independence.html,
    29/8/2012

    http://neweasternpolitics.wordpress.com/2012/08/29/from-ankara-to-tehran-the-persian-ottoman-rivalry-is-back-by-yeghig-tashjian/

Working...
X