Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenia-Georgia: Controversial Statements On Both Sides Create Tensi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armenia-Georgia: Controversial Statements On Both Sides Create Tensi

    ARMENIA-GEORGIA: CONTROVERSIAL STATEMENTS ON BOTH SIDES CREATE TENSION AHEAD OF IVANISHVILI'S YEREVAN VISIT

    Analysis | 17.01.13 | 13:05

    By Gayane Abrahamyan
    ArmeniaNow reporter

    Georgia's new Prime Minister Bidzina Ivanishvili's first official
    visit to Armenia is accompanied with a certain degree of tension in
    Armenian-Georgian relations.

    During the last month two senior figures in Georgia, in particular
    Foreign Minister of Georgia Maya Panjikidze and Catholicos-Patriarch
    of All Georgia Ilia II, reportedly made controversial comments
    regarding the Karabakh conflict, mainly expressing support for
    Azerbaijan's territorial integrity in its dispute with Armenia. The
    statements were met critically by some media and pundits in Armenia.

    There were some controversial comments going the opposite direction as
    well, as one of the presidential candidates in Armenia's unfolding
    race, Vardan Sedrakyan (often referred to as the Eposaget, or an epic
    studies specialist due to one of his former occupations) has made
    anti-Georgian statements, drawing an angry reaction in the neighboring
    republic and causing an escalation of tension in relations between the
    two neighbors.

    In his program related to foreign policies Sedrakyan, an obscure
    figure in Armenian politics who became known to the public due to his
    declaration of an intent to run for president months before the
    election, said [the Armenian-populated Georgian province of] Javakhk
    should be reunited with Armenia and Armenia should recognize the
    independence of [Georgian breakaway republics of] Abkhazia and South
    Ossetia. He said he had "analyzed" the situation and concluded that
    "after destroying Syria the West would switch over to the long-planned
    program of eliminating Armenia with the assistance of the 'fraternal'
    Georgians."

    Even though these statements in no way reflect the state policies of
    Armenia, nonetheless in Georgia they elicit some reaction, which, as
    many ethnic Armenians in Georgia complain, creates "unnecessary
    tensions and anti-Armenian sentiments".

    "Irresponsible statements perhaps do not attract as much attention in
    Armenia, but here [in Georgia] people don't know whether this man is a
    serious politician and presidential candidate or not, and his words do
    matter in a certain way," Chairman of the Union of Armenians of
    Georgia Henrikh Muradyan explained to ArmeniaNow.

    Georgia is home to more than 200,000 Armenians. In one of his first
    post-election interviews current Prime Minister Ivanishvili
    controversially expressed his astonishment at why Armenians do not go
    to live in their homeland. "We, Georgians, are so strange, we are
    connected to our land. This is our nature, For example, we have
    Armenians living in our country. We are surprised that they live here.

    Perhaps such questions do not occur to you, but it is unclear to me,"
    said Ivanishvili in an interview with the Russian newspaper,
    Newtimes.ru, last autumn.

    The interview raised a new wave of anger among Javakhk Armenians, who,
    although they became more cautious because of the imprisonment of
    three activists (two of whom were released under an amnesty earlier
    this month), still insisted that Ivanishvili owed an explanation
    because they thought Armenians lived in their historical lands.

    Specialist in Georgian studies who teaches at the Yerevan State
    University Haykazun Alvrtsyan thinks that Georgia is advancing more
    claims and is carrying out larger anti-Armenian propaganda than even
    Turkey or Azerbaijan.

    "This is certainly a more covert propaganda, but even in the textbooks
    approved by the state it is obvious that Georgia has territorial
    claims to Armenia. They show maps, alleging that many lands in today's
    Armenia once belonged to Georgia, including historical Armenian lands
    such as the whole area of Ani (now in eastern Turkey)," says
    Alvrtsyan, stressing that the Government of Armenia should pay more
    attention to the problem of Javakhk.

    Another cause for tensions in Armenian-Georgian relations is the issue
    of the ownership of Armenian churches in Georgia, the poor condition
    in which they are now, and, as Armenian experts argue, the
    'Georgianization' of Armenian monuments.

    Last May heavy rains in the Georgian capital of Tbilisi damaged the
    local Armenian Surb (Saint) Nshan church, several other Armenian
    churches have been in a neglected state and have collapsed in Georgia
    recent years. "For some reason rains in Georgia damage only Armenian
    monuments," says monuments expert Samvel Karapetyan, implying that the
    damage occurs only where monuments are neglected.

    Armenian analysts expect no immediate answers to be given during
    Ivanishvili's Yerevan visit, to issues that have been on the agenda of
    Armenian-Georgian relations for years - such as the question of
    education for Javakhk Armenians, their language and ethnic identity,
    liberties, the protection of Armenian monuments and their legal
    status.

    After seeing his political party's success in last October's election,
    Ivanishvili, as Prime Minister, is expected to assume full executive
    power in the country after current President Mikheil Saakashvili's
    departure from the top post later this year.

    http://armenianow.com/commentary/analysis/42609/armenia_georgia_relations_bidzina_ivanishvili_visi t

Working...
X