Tweet
Artsakh MP Balasanyan: "I saw nothing in Renaissance Square yesterday
that reminded me of 1988"
Hayk Ghazaryan
http://hetq.am/eng/news/23370/artsakh-mp-balasanyan-i-saw-nothing-in-renaissance-square-yesterday-that-reminded-me-of-1988.html
11:12, February 15, 2013
A public discussion on the theme `Elections in Armenia and the
Conflict' took place yesterday at the Park Hotel Artsakh in
Stepanakert.
It followed the presentation of a Civilitas Foundation report entitled
`Armenia 2012; Election Year', organized by Civilitas and the Artsakh
Foreign Policy and Security Public Council.
Taking part in the discussion were Vitaly Balasanyan (a member of the
Artsakh Parliament who ran in the recent presidential election) and
Armen Sargsyan (an Artsakh MP and head of the Artsakh ARF
Parliamentary Faction), Moderating the discussion was Civilitas
analyst Tatul Hakobyan
Tatul Hakobyan: It's no secret that many things are decided in
Yerevan. In a few days the presidential election will take place in
Armenia. What expectations do you have? How have the candidates dealt
with the Karabakh settlement issue. Is the Karabakh issue even a
factor in the election?
Vitaly Balasanyan: Till today, Karabakh faces the problem of
integrating with Armenia. Perhaps from 1994 onwards, after the war,
Karabakh has remained outside the domestic political landscape of
Armenia for the simple reason that authorities in Armenia invited
President Kocharian, the president of an unrecognized nation, to
Armenia and appointed him prime minister. After this Karabakh remained
outside the negotiation process and especially removed from domestic
politics in Armenia. This is the primary reason why everything related
to Artsakh is decided in Yerevan. When our leader showed up in
Armenia, it is understandable that everything would be decided there.
Let me remind you that wasn't the case in 1988. All the important
decisions forming the basis of the documents of the movement were made
in Karabakh. They all were directed to the same goal of reuniting
Karabak with Armenia.
Yesterday's celebration in Stepanakert's Renaissance Square
commemorating the 25th anniversary of the movement left a bad taste in
my mouth. There was no trace of what we had struggled for in 1988. No
one uttered the word `unity'. At least they should have made a call
for `freedom'. But I heard neither. The fault is ours, both the people
and the government.
Armen Sargsyan: Of course much is decided in Yerevan. But the problem
is that we must struggle to see that Yerevan makes the correct
decisions.
Tatul Hakobyan: Mr. Balasanyan, there's an interesting situation in
the Armenian world. In Artsakh and in the Diaspora people often say
that the authorities in Armenia must be from Artsakh so that they
don't sell Karabakh out. Does this make sense or is it a somewhat
naieve belief exploited by certain political forces?
Vitaly Balasanyan: I adamantly oppose such an opinion. The biggest
mistake happened when Karabakh officials wound up in Armenia.
Yes, it's a manner of holding on to power. Regardless of who is in
power in Armenia, the notion that someone from Gyumri or elsewhere
isn't concerned about Artsakh and that only someone from Karabakh is,
must be erased from our way of thinking. It takes us nowhere to think
like this.
Tatul Hakobyan: Mr. Sargsyan, how are the presidential candidates in
Armenia coming across on the Karabakh settlement issue? Only two,
Serzh Sargsyan and Raffi Hovannisian, have said anything specific.
Hovannisian has called for Armenia to recognize Artsakh and Serzh
Sargsyan criticized him for it. In your opinion, just how interesting
a topic is Artsakh in the domestic political life in Armenia and
especially in the elections?
Armen Sargsyan: Karabakh will participate in the negotiations process
and Armenia must serve as the guarantor of Karabakh's security and
independence in the process. As such, Armenia must recognize the
independence of Karabakh. The question remains how to recognize. That
time has passed. In 1992, the ARF demanded that Levon Ter-Petrosyan
recognize the independence of the NKR, but he didn't even want to meet
with Artur Lazarian on the matter.
As to the statement by the Heritage Party leader that Artsakh's
independence must be recognized, we suggest something different. We
talk about a strategic alliance between Armenia and Karabakh. Thus,
Armenia will recognize Karabakh both de facto and de jure. For Armenia
to recognize Karabakh today, suddenly after all these years of not
doing so, would be a bit absurd.
that reminded me of 1988"
Hayk Ghazaryan
http://hetq.am/eng/news/23370/artsakh-mp-balasanyan-i-saw-nothing-in-renaissance-square-yesterday-that-reminded-me-of-1988.html
11:12, February 15, 2013
A public discussion on the theme `Elections in Armenia and the
Conflict' took place yesterday at the Park Hotel Artsakh in
Stepanakert.
It followed the presentation of a Civilitas Foundation report entitled
`Armenia 2012; Election Year', organized by Civilitas and the Artsakh
Foreign Policy and Security Public Council.
Taking part in the discussion were Vitaly Balasanyan (a member of the
Artsakh Parliament who ran in the recent presidential election) and
Armen Sargsyan (an Artsakh MP and head of the Artsakh ARF
Parliamentary Faction), Moderating the discussion was Civilitas
analyst Tatul Hakobyan
Tatul Hakobyan: It's no secret that many things are decided in
Yerevan. In a few days the presidential election will take place in
Armenia. What expectations do you have? How have the candidates dealt
with the Karabakh settlement issue. Is the Karabakh issue even a
factor in the election?
Vitaly Balasanyan: Till today, Karabakh faces the problem of
integrating with Armenia. Perhaps from 1994 onwards, after the war,
Karabakh has remained outside the domestic political landscape of
Armenia for the simple reason that authorities in Armenia invited
President Kocharian, the president of an unrecognized nation, to
Armenia and appointed him prime minister. After this Karabakh remained
outside the negotiation process and especially removed from domestic
politics in Armenia. This is the primary reason why everything related
to Artsakh is decided in Yerevan. When our leader showed up in
Armenia, it is understandable that everything would be decided there.
Let me remind you that wasn't the case in 1988. All the important
decisions forming the basis of the documents of the movement were made
in Karabakh. They all were directed to the same goal of reuniting
Karabak with Armenia.
Yesterday's celebration in Stepanakert's Renaissance Square
commemorating the 25th anniversary of the movement left a bad taste in
my mouth. There was no trace of what we had struggled for in 1988. No
one uttered the word `unity'. At least they should have made a call
for `freedom'. But I heard neither. The fault is ours, both the people
and the government.
Armen Sargsyan: Of course much is decided in Yerevan. But the problem
is that we must struggle to see that Yerevan makes the correct
decisions.
Tatul Hakobyan: Mr. Balasanyan, there's an interesting situation in
the Armenian world. In Artsakh and in the Diaspora people often say
that the authorities in Armenia must be from Artsakh so that they
don't sell Karabakh out. Does this make sense or is it a somewhat
naieve belief exploited by certain political forces?
Vitaly Balasanyan: I adamantly oppose such an opinion. The biggest
mistake happened when Karabakh officials wound up in Armenia.
Yes, it's a manner of holding on to power. Regardless of who is in
power in Armenia, the notion that someone from Gyumri or elsewhere
isn't concerned about Artsakh and that only someone from Karabakh is,
must be erased from our way of thinking. It takes us nowhere to think
like this.
Tatul Hakobyan: Mr. Sargsyan, how are the presidential candidates in
Armenia coming across on the Karabakh settlement issue? Only two,
Serzh Sargsyan and Raffi Hovannisian, have said anything specific.
Hovannisian has called for Armenia to recognize Artsakh and Serzh
Sargsyan criticized him for it. In your opinion, just how interesting
a topic is Artsakh in the domestic political life in Armenia and
especially in the elections?
Armen Sargsyan: Karabakh will participate in the negotiations process
and Armenia must serve as the guarantor of Karabakh's security and
independence in the process. As such, Armenia must recognize the
independence of Karabakh. The question remains how to recognize. That
time has passed. In 1992, the ARF demanded that Levon Ter-Petrosyan
recognize the independence of the NKR, but he didn't even want to meet
with Artur Lazarian on the matter.
As to the statement by the Heritage Party leader that Artsakh's
independence must be recognized, we suggest something different. We
talk about a strategic alliance between Armenia and Karabakh. Thus,
Armenia will recognize Karabakh both de facto and de jure. For Armenia
to recognize Karabakh today, suddenly after all these years of not
doing so, would be a bit absurd.