Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Decline of Armenian Nationalism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Decline of Armenian Nationalism

    The Decline of Armenian Nationalism

    http://asbarez.com/108314/the-decline-of-armenian-nationalism/
    Friday, February 15th, 2013 | Posted by Contributor


    The 2013 Presidential campaign

    BY HRANT APOVIAN

    I am a soldier [the nation] is my commander
    I obey without question all its orders
    with closed eyes I carry out my duty.
    Ziya Gökalp

    The upcoming elections in Armenia do not bode well for the future of
    our nation. The absence of viable candidates, the lack of political
    debate, devoid of any discussion of national survival issues is
    tantamount to collective suicide.

    What is taking us headlong to the edge of the precipice is the lack of
    discussion regarding matters of national importance, national
    security, national identity, foreign policy, survival of the
    republic - our survival as a nation.

    Our compatriots in Armenia are waging a war on poverty, trying very
    hard to make a living and alternately leaving for better prospects
    abroad. Our people in the Diaspora are waging a war for survival in
    the midst of upheavals in the Middle East and leaving for better
    prospects in the West, and eventually losing their identity by the
    assimilation Tsunami.

    The result is a rapid deterioration of Nationalism in our people: That
    deep seated belief in our national identity, of being one nation, one
    people, fighting against occupation, against tyranny, against
    persecution that took a hundred fifty years to erupt and to evolve,
    that Rafi inspired; The revolutionary fervor that energized
    revolutionary parties, and vaccinated so many brave men and women is
    on its way to extinction.

    The reality among Armenia's ruling government circles is that the
    perception and understanding of foreign policy as to what is in the
    interest of the survival of the Armenian Nation, is not based on our
    National Security Interests.

    The ill fated protocol treaty signed by the Armenian Government is one
    instance of a total lack of understanding of national security
    concerns for Armenia. It will engulf Armenia in a forced capitulation
    of our national rights and will severely damage the quest for justice
    for the Armenian Genocide.

    The ongoing presidential debates are devoid of a national discussion
    of foreign policy issues. Depletion of Armenia's Population is thought
    of as a propaganda tool used by the opposition, but not a serious
    threat, and the uneven distribution of wealth in Armenia is looked
    upon as a consequence of Capitalism in the New World Order.

    We are getting ready to commemorate the hundredth Anniversary of the
    Armenian Genocide. This is being looked at as a decisive milestone in
    our quest for justice at last. The truth is the anticipation for a
    breakthrough and the subsequent results might be anticlimactic.

    The Armenian Government's perception is vastly different than the
    Diaspora's; where one looks at the Centennial as a milestone to demand
    recognition, whereas the Diaspora is seeking justice and reparations.

    The fear is that this kind of discord may jeopardize the goals. The
    risk is that those who perpetrated the Genocide might benefit from
    this discord and that their preparations against our onslaught might
    be far better organized to squash our attempts.

    The last burst of Nationalism was when the People of Nagorno-Karabakh
    took up arms to defend their land at great cost in lives and at great
    sacrifice. One would anticipate that the national fervor that swept
    across the Armenian Nation worldwide at the time would be perpetual.
    However what was won at great cost is no more at the center of our
    struggle. No serious attempts are made to repopulate liberated
    territories. No serious diplomatic drive, to acquire recognition for
    independance has been attempted to this date.

    What are the possible causes for the regression in Nationalism?

    First: To begin with the World Order has changed and Armenians as
    citizens of the world - including the population in Armenia - are
    affected by a universal decline in Ideology. Material pursuits
    overwhelm Ideological ones and are affecting new generations.

    Second: As time passes we have lost our memory passed on to us by our
    Grandfathers and Grandmothers. Assimilation in its many forms is
    rearing its ugly head and wreaking havoc in families of both Armenian
    parents and mixed marriages.

    Third: The position of the ruling government in Armenia that was set
    by the First President of Armenia and which is still pervasive, based
    on a short sided understanding of what Armenia's priorities should be;
    downplaying and undermining any attempt to base Armenia's security on
    a vigilant strengthening of our independence and a quest for justice
    for the Armenian Genocide.

    Fourth: The lack of Education of the new generation, the teaching of a
    proper understanding of historical precedent. Even the current
    president of Armenia lacks a proper perception of the significance and
    implications of the term `Genocide' over that of `Metz Yeghern'. The
    president also needs to be educated as to the true nature and
    intentions of our neighbors on the West and East Side of Armenia.

    Fifth: For a people to be able to pursue national objectives, it has
    to be in a position of economic and social safety, just enough to
    allow for the pursuit of nationalistic goals.

    Sixth: Admittedly, Armenia has a strong army. However, a strong army
    should be accompanied by a robust foreign policy; one that can put
    Armenia on the offensive and overcome the propaganda war waged against
    us and undermining our Republic.

    What is Nationalism?

    `Nationalism is a political ideology that involves a strong
    identification of a group of individuals with a nation. There are two
    major perspectives on the origins and basis of nationalism, one is
    that primordialist perspective that describes nationalism as a
    reflection of the ancient and perceived evolutionary tendency of
    humans to organize into distinct grouping based on an affinity of
    birth; the other is the modernist perspective that describes
    nationalism as a recent phenomenon that requires the structural
    conditions of modern society, in order to exist.'

    `The adoption of national identity in terms of historical development,
    has commonly been the result of a response by an influential group or
    groups that is unsatisfied with traditional identities due to
    inconsistency between their defined social order and the experience of
    that social order by its members, resulting in a situation of anomie,
    that nationalists seek to resolve. This anomie results in a society or
    societies reinterpreting identity, retaining elements that are deemed
    acceptable and removing elements deemed unacceptable, in order to
    create a unified community. This development may be the result of
    internal structural issues or the result of resentment by an existing
    group or groups towards other communities, especially foreign powers
    that are or are deemed to be controlling them.'

    What is direly needed is a new spark by intellectuals and a new
    leadership to revive the ideas of Nationhood, our National Cause, and
    a strong sense of national identity uniting Armenians. What is needed
    is the realization that without strong nationalistic feelings, we as a
    nation will wither away. We deserve leaders who have the vision and
    courage to overcome obstacles and put our national aspirations first,
    and who will establish the necessary structures towards that end.



    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X