Tweet
CITIZEN ACTIVIST TO OSCE OBSERVERS: "STOP LEGITIMIZING FRAUDULENT ELECTIONS IN ARMENIA"
http://hetq.am/eng/news/23565/citizen-activist-to-osce-observers-stop-legitimizing-fraudulent-elections-in-armenia.html
16:04, February 19, 2013
What follows is the statement read today by political activist Lena
Nazaryan at the press conference held by OSCE PA election observers.
The OSCE observers walked out of the hall when Nazaryan took the
podium to read the statement on behalf of the citizens of Armenia.
Dear political tourists, we have had enough of your efforts to
legitimize the fraudulent elections.
The recent presidential election in Armenia, when compared to previous
presidential elections, has registered one step forward and three
steps backwards, two steps to the right and a half step to the left.
In a word, they haven't corresponded to the RA Constitution, to the
demands of the Election Code as well as international standards.
The elections have proceeded against the backdrop of proposed reforms
to the Election Code by the parliamentary opposition that were rejected
by the ruling majority. Even though international and domestic
observers, rights defenders and the opposition raised concerns,
especially regarding glaring inaccuracies in the voter rolls, after
the parliamentary election, nevertheless, the ruling authorities did
nothing to fix the problem before this recent presidential election.
In essence, last year's parliamentary election and yesterday;'
presidential election took place on the same legal-normative basis.
Of note is the fact that in the February 18 presidential election none
of Armenia's primary political opposition forces either nominated
their own candidate or supported any of the nominated candidates. I
refer to the Armenian National Congress, Prosperous Armenia, the AR
and the Free Democrats. This is ample proof that the election was
not truly competitive.
The fact that none of the primary opposition groups refused to nominate
their own candidate or support any other candidate running, points to
the deep level of mistrust of citizens and political forces regarding
the electoral process.
Thus, the opposition forces in the parliament, from the outset, have
labelled the presidential election as a farce and a show, since as
previously noted, the ruling majority squashed the passage of election
reforms proposed by the opposition prior to the election period.
Even though on the surface there was the appearance that important
democratic freedoms were being safeguarded during the campaign,
including the right to run a free campaign, in reality, the campaign
was noteworthy by its competitive inequality in favour of the candidate
of the regime. In particular, administrative resources and powers
were put into the service of the latter. This was accomplished via
pressure brought to bear on state and public employees to attend
campaign events of Serzh Sargsyan and to vote in his favour.
The election campaign did not proceed peacefully. Violence was
inflicted on candidate Paryur Hayrikian. The man was shot. Another
candidate, Andreas Ghoukasyan, staged a hunger strike to protest the
electoral process which he labelled a mere show. The press covered
cases of violence even on Election Day.
The campaign also stood out by its lack of political and individual
professionalism. Candidates employed the crudest of language and
public relation stunts. For example, the various incidents that
took place during the campaign conducted by the regime's candidate
were widely mocked by large segments of society. As a consequence,
citizens tended not to take the election process seriously.
On Election Day, polling precincts were transformed into theatrical
stages where citizens showed their attitude to the process. The press
and social internet sites were full of ballots invalidated by voters
who drew caricatures on them. They drew images of figures from the
plant and animal world, images lifted from fairy tales and television
cartoon characters. In one precinct, a voter literally ate his ballot
as a sign of protest. It significant to note that according to official
statistics, the number of invalidated ballots came in third place.
Reports of duplicate voting, ballot stuffing, bribes, and substitute
voting and other scams were raised throughout the election itself.
Thus, yesterday's presidential election in Armenia can be described
as yet another normal appalling election.
Dear political tourists, we've had enough of you legitimizing the
fraudulent election. You are trampling those democratic values that
you yourselves have broken.
From: Baghdasarian
http://hetq.am/eng/news/23565/citizen-activist-to-osce-observers-stop-legitimizing-fraudulent-elections-in-armenia.html
16:04, February 19, 2013
What follows is the statement read today by political activist Lena
Nazaryan at the press conference held by OSCE PA election observers.
The OSCE observers walked out of the hall when Nazaryan took the
podium to read the statement on behalf of the citizens of Armenia.
Dear political tourists, we have had enough of your efforts to
legitimize the fraudulent elections.
The recent presidential election in Armenia, when compared to previous
presidential elections, has registered one step forward and three
steps backwards, two steps to the right and a half step to the left.
In a word, they haven't corresponded to the RA Constitution, to the
demands of the Election Code as well as international standards.
The elections have proceeded against the backdrop of proposed reforms
to the Election Code by the parliamentary opposition that were rejected
by the ruling majority. Even though international and domestic
observers, rights defenders and the opposition raised concerns,
especially regarding glaring inaccuracies in the voter rolls, after
the parliamentary election, nevertheless, the ruling authorities did
nothing to fix the problem before this recent presidential election.
In essence, last year's parliamentary election and yesterday;'
presidential election took place on the same legal-normative basis.
Of note is the fact that in the February 18 presidential election none
of Armenia's primary political opposition forces either nominated
their own candidate or supported any of the nominated candidates. I
refer to the Armenian National Congress, Prosperous Armenia, the AR
and the Free Democrats. This is ample proof that the election was
not truly competitive.
The fact that none of the primary opposition groups refused to nominate
their own candidate or support any other candidate running, points to
the deep level of mistrust of citizens and political forces regarding
the electoral process.
Thus, the opposition forces in the parliament, from the outset, have
labelled the presidential election as a farce and a show, since as
previously noted, the ruling majority squashed the passage of election
reforms proposed by the opposition prior to the election period.
Even though on the surface there was the appearance that important
democratic freedoms were being safeguarded during the campaign,
including the right to run a free campaign, in reality, the campaign
was noteworthy by its competitive inequality in favour of the candidate
of the regime. In particular, administrative resources and powers
were put into the service of the latter. This was accomplished via
pressure brought to bear on state and public employees to attend
campaign events of Serzh Sargsyan and to vote in his favour.
The election campaign did not proceed peacefully. Violence was
inflicted on candidate Paryur Hayrikian. The man was shot. Another
candidate, Andreas Ghoukasyan, staged a hunger strike to protest the
electoral process which he labelled a mere show. The press covered
cases of violence even on Election Day.
The campaign also stood out by its lack of political and individual
professionalism. Candidates employed the crudest of language and
public relation stunts. For example, the various incidents that
took place during the campaign conducted by the regime's candidate
were widely mocked by large segments of society. As a consequence,
citizens tended not to take the election process seriously.
On Election Day, polling precincts were transformed into theatrical
stages where citizens showed their attitude to the process. The press
and social internet sites were full of ballots invalidated by voters
who drew caricatures on them. They drew images of figures from the
plant and animal world, images lifted from fairy tales and television
cartoon characters. In one precinct, a voter literally ate his ballot
as a sign of protest. It significant to note that according to official
statistics, the number of invalidated ballots came in third place.
Reports of duplicate voting, ballot stuffing, bribes, and substitute
voting and other scams were raised throughout the election itself.
Thus, yesterday's presidential election in Armenia can be described
as yet another normal appalling election.
Dear political tourists, we've had enough of you legitimizing the
fraudulent election. You are trampling those democratic values that
you yourselves have broken.
From: Baghdasarian