Tweet
ARMENIA'S KEY PROBLEM
Igor Muradyan
17:28 27/02/2013
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index.php/eng/0/comments/view/29115
There is no social-political problem which cannot be recognized and
understood by the society once false complexes are dropped, and they
pretend that the society is public at large or the majority of people.
The national liberation movement of people has always and everywhere
contradicted the interests of the bourgeoisie. The state of national
liberation movement in which the Armenian nation is, which is certain,
leads to a synthesis of aristocratic and marginal public statuses.
Only highly limited people, despite their high level of formal
education, are unable to understand that a bourgeois-nationalist
state may not be established in Armenia.
Bourgeois nationalism has led to a deep crisis of the Armenian
society in the Diaspora and exposed the independence of the Armenian
state. In addition, the Armenian bourgeoisie has always been petty and
miserable and cannot offer anything significant either in the economy,
or in politics.
Limited results of activities of the Armenian lobby in the United
States and France demonstrates the misery of bourgeois essence
of public mentality. The national liberation movement in all its
expressions is counterrevolutionary, not revolutionary in character.
(As one studies the history of ARF and Hnchak Party, one understands
that every significant achievement has a counterrevolutionary
motivation, and speaking in more tangible terms - reactionary.)
Why does modern bourgeoisie prefer the present pseudo-democratic
principles, such nonsense as universal suffrage though it could do
well without this mess? Because modern pseudo-democracy is a method of
holding on to power and suppressing national interests. What do the
Armenian voters vote for? For one representative of the interests of
the bourgeoisie or another which hates national interests, the real
legal state, such a notion as social justice.
This is doomed to mockery or oblivion accompanied with the slogans
of rightist ideology. The rightist political ideology has nothing in
common with the den of liberal arbitrariness in the world which has
led to the deepest crisis of economy and values. While other nations
can afford such luxury as expectation of better times, Armenia is
located at the line of actual geopolitical fault, is short of time for
further toleration of the government of bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie
must run businesses and pay taxes while other groups must do politics.
Presently Armenia is caught by centers of power which impart it with
a new status in geopolitics but it happens in return for sovereignty.
This can be tolerated for some tome but will end up in a disaster if
it becomes chronology.
One way or another, left-radical and right-radical groups will
form in Armenia. The question is who will rule them. In the current
situation no political party or group can take any radical step to
level bourgeois life style and political style.
Nevertheless, there are preconditions for a right riot against
bourgeoisie in Armenia. Who will lead that, the current ruling regime
which would be the most effective option in terms of macro-expenditure
and the distance of the critical way? This right turn of the society
may cost the life of the political government of Armenia but it is
already facing the loss of its head, which may result in a political
fiasco or a successful solution for the political task.
Nothing can be as helpful for the achievement of these goals as
integration with the Euro-Atlantic community (and there is no need
to give examples of contemporary history of other countries, we have
our own issues and our own mission).
Igor Muradyan
17:28 27/02/2013
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index.php/eng/0/comments/view/29115
There is no social-political problem which cannot be recognized and
understood by the society once false complexes are dropped, and they
pretend that the society is public at large or the majority of people.
The national liberation movement of people has always and everywhere
contradicted the interests of the bourgeoisie. The state of national
liberation movement in which the Armenian nation is, which is certain,
leads to a synthesis of aristocratic and marginal public statuses.
Only highly limited people, despite their high level of formal
education, are unable to understand that a bourgeois-nationalist
state may not be established in Armenia.
Bourgeois nationalism has led to a deep crisis of the Armenian
society in the Diaspora and exposed the independence of the Armenian
state. In addition, the Armenian bourgeoisie has always been petty and
miserable and cannot offer anything significant either in the economy,
or in politics.
Limited results of activities of the Armenian lobby in the United
States and France demonstrates the misery of bourgeois essence
of public mentality. The national liberation movement in all its
expressions is counterrevolutionary, not revolutionary in character.
(As one studies the history of ARF and Hnchak Party, one understands
that every significant achievement has a counterrevolutionary
motivation, and speaking in more tangible terms - reactionary.)
Why does modern bourgeoisie prefer the present pseudo-democratic
principles, such nonsense as universal suffrage though it could do
well without this mess? Because modern pseudo-democracy is a method of
holding on to power and suppressing national interests. What do the
Armenian voters vote for? For one representative of the interests of
the bourgeoisie or another which hates national interests, the real
legal state, such a notion as social justice.
This is doomed to mockery or oblivion accompanied with the slogans
of rightist ideology. The rightist political ideology has nothing in
common with the den of liberal arbitrariness in the world which has
led to the deepest crisis of economy and values. While other nations
can afford such luxury as expectation of better times, Armenia is
located at the line of actual geopolitical fault, is short of time for
further toleration of the government of bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie
must run businesses and pay taxes while other groups must do politics.
Presently Armenia is caught by centers of power which impart it with
a new status in geopolitics but it happens in return for sovereignty.
This can be tolerated for some tome but will end up in a disaster if
it becomes chronology.
One way or another, left-radical and right-radical groups will
form in Armenia. The question is who will rule them. In the current
situation no political party or group can take any radical step to
level bourgeois life style and political style.
Nevertheless, there are preconditions for a right riot against
bourgeoisie in Armenia. Who will lead that, the current ruling regime
which would be the most effective option in terms of macro-expenditure
and the distance of the critical way? This right turn of the society
may cost the life of the political government of Armenia but it is
already facing the loss of its head, which may result in a political
fiasco or a successful solution for the political task.
Nothing can be as helpful for the achievement of these goals as
integration with the Euro-Atlantic community (and there is no need
to give examples of contemporary history of other countries, we have
our own issues and our own mission).