Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Guns or Roses: When Comes Real Shift In Global Arms Trade?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Guns or Roses: When Comes Real Shift In Global Arms Trade?

    Guns or Roses: When Comes Real Shift In Global Arms Trade?

    The
    Huffington Post (UK)
    25/02/2013

    by Ilco van der Linde, Founder/Creative Director MasterPeace

    During the last two weeks some media wrote about a 'shift in global
    arms trade'. Without serious fact checking even some peace activists
    announced the dawn of a new era. Is it really time to party? This
    month the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)
    published its Yearbook 2012, which includes information about the Top
    100 of weapon producing companies. In 2011 these companies sold $410
    billion worth weaponry and yes, that is 1,1 billion less then in
    2010. But it is only 0.3% down so there is no reason at all for
    cheering. Especially taking into consideration that in the last decade
    'the Top 100' increased their sales with 60%. SIPRI: "The world
    military expenditure in 2011 is estimated to have been $1738
    billion. Compared to the total in 2010, military spending has remained
    virtually unchanged in real terms. However, it is still too early to
    say whether this means that world military expenditure has ям=81nally
    peaked."

    If weapons would actually bring safety for people in general the USA,
    the country with the most weapons per capita, would be the safest
    country of the world. Quod non. On the contrary I strongly believe
    that if this 1738 billion US Dollars ($249 for each person) would be
    spent on food or education it would surely bring more sustainable
    safety. Bob Marley sung it loud and clear: a hungry man is an angry
    man...


    Let's have a look to the new republic of South Sudan. In many villages
    people hardly get the food, medicines or education they require, but
    nevertheless the government has decided to spend half of its budget to
    buy new weaponry. And sooner or later these weapons will be used in a
    new armed conflict. And the weapons sold to Assad in Syria are now
    being used against his own civilians and the weapons once sold to
    Kadafi in Libya were looted from his depots by Islamists and used in
    Mali to suppress and kill people in the northern part of that
    country. Some of these weapons also reached Niger, Chad and the
    Gaza. Automatic guns, rocket launchers, tanks and other heavy stuff
    fall in the wrong hands on a daily basis. Each minute someone dies as
    a result of armed conflict. Companies sell weapons to both Armenia and
    Azerbaijan knowing this 'has the potential to increase the risk of
    renewed conflict' between these two countries (SIPRI). Cars loaded
    with weapons travel in Africa from conflict area to conflict area and
    often sell to both parties.

    When will the world finally wake up and say 'enough is enough' to this
    whole system of making money by producing, selling and exporting
    weapons all over the globe and by doing so fueling war and violence,
    directly or indirectly?

    The only optimistic fact I see is that the world military expenditure
    has not grown any further for the first time since 1998 and if we can
    from now on decrease the weapon sales by a serious 5% per year then by
    2025 we will be back at the level of 2000. This would directly and
    indirectly save the lives of many and bring reason for endless
    optimistic articles. Especially in full democratic countries as USA,
    Germany, UK and France - all in the Top 5 of countries with the
    highest weapon export and home to 51 of the Top 100 of weapon
    producing companies - people should demand their governments to yearly
    downscale the weapon export with 5%. Gradually we should transform
    this lethal business into sustainable business.

    Some say we can't because we'll lose too many jobs, but that's
    nonsense. Take the transformation of the German Ruhr area as an
    example. Within 30 years they have transformed the economy based on
    environmental unfriendly businesses to an economy based on sustainable
    high tech. World leaders, business leaders, you; don't forget to be
    awesome and start that other future right now and here. If not we all
    have to flee to Iceland. According to the Global Peace Index, also
    released by SIPRI in their Yearbook, Iceland is the most peaceful
    country of the world...


    Follow Ilco van der Linde on Twitter: www.twitter.com/IlcoMasterPeace

Working...
X