Tweet
Israel's apology to Turkey was a mistake
by Efraim Inbar
The Jerusalem Post
March 28, 2013
Israel's apology to Turkey for "operational errors" in the Mavi
Marmara incident is a diplomatic mistake both in terms of substance
and timing. It's hard to understand or justify Israel's weekend
apology to Turkey. While the use of Israeli force in the Mavi Marmara
"flotilla" incident was not very elegant, it was perfectly legitimate
- as the UN-appointed "Palmer Commission" unequivocally determined.
Moreover, the incident was a Turkish provocation that warrants a
Turkish apology, not an Israeli one.
Worse still, the hopes in Jerusalem for a new era in Israeli-Turkish
relations in exchange for the apology are simply illusory.
The Israeli apology will hardly stop Turkish Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan's regular Israel-bashing rhetoric. Nor has it secured a
clear Turkish commitment for the resumption of full diplomatic
relations.
Moreover, Erdogan already has conveyed his intention to visit
Hamas-ruled Gaza. Such a visit is a slap in the face to both Jerusalem
and Washington.
Turkey, under the AKP, an Islamist party, has gradually adopted a new
foreign policy, fueled by neo-Ottoman and Islamist impulses, whose
goal is to gain a leadership role in the Middle East and the Islamic
world.
Attaining this objective requires harsh criticism of Israel, which has
generated great popularity for Erdogan and Turkey. Unfortunately,
vicious attacks on Israel come easily for Erdogan, who is plainly and
simply an anti-Semite.
Israel has failed to fully grasp Turkey's new Islamist direction. For
several years already, we no longer have a pro-Western Turkey with
which Israel can cooperate in the turbulent Middle East. Ankara and
Jerusalem have very different views on a variety of issues. While
Turkey is truly an important and powerful player in regional politics,
its behavior over the past decade actually harms Israeli interests. It
does not follow the US policy on Iran and helps circumvent the
international sanctions imposed on Tehran. As a matter of fact, Turkey
helps Iran, a country with genocidal intentions toward Israel, to
progress in its nuclear program.
Turkey also sides with Hamas, an Islamist terrorist organization
dedicated to the destruction of the Jewish state, and helps it
entrench its rule in Gaza and gain international support and
recognition.
Turkey is also actively helping radical Islamic Sunni elements take
over Syria. It also supports the idea of violent opposition against
Israel's presence in the Golan Heights. As such, the hope that Israel
and Turkey can cooperate together with the US in limiting the damage
from a disintegrating Syria has little validity.
Furthermore, Turkey, still a NATO member, is obstructing the efforts
of Israel in developing its ties with this organization. The Turkish
position in NATO also hinders the Western alliance's ability to deal
more effectively with the Iranian nuclear challenge.
Turkey's policy in the Mediterranean similarly clashes with Israeli
vital interests. Its bullying of Cyprus interferes with Israel's plans
to export via this island its newly found gas riches to an energy-
thirsty Europe. Turkey, that sees itself as an energy bridge to
Europe, does not want the Israeli competition. It may even use
military force to maintain its role in the energy market.
What is also important is how the Israeli apology will be perceived in
a region whose prism on international relations is power politics.
Inevitably, Israel under Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu will be
seen as weak, bowing to American pressure. Public regrets about use of
force erode deterrence and project weakness.
Perceived weakness usually invites aggression in our tough neighborhood.
This is also what Ankara thinks, which is very problematic for Israel.
Moreover, Tehran and Cairo, both ruled by radical Islamists, cherish
the Turkish victory over the Zionist entity.
The Israeli-initiated apology is an American diplomatic success, but
reflects a dangerous American misperception of Turkey as representing
"moderate Islam," which is incredible naïve. Turkey is distancing
itself from the West and its values.
Nowadays, more journalists are in jail in Turkey than in China.
Israel's friends in Turkey, part of the democratic opposition, must be
bewildered as Israel hands Erdogan a diplomatic achievement,
buttressing the grip of the Islamist AKP on Turkish politics.
The timing is particularly troubling.
Turkish foreign policy is in crisis because its much-heralded approach
to the Middle East ("zero problems with its neighbors") is in
shambles. Turkey needed a diplomatic success here more than Israel
did. Israel could have negotiated a better formula to end the impasse
in bilateral relations.
Only very recently, we heard Erdogan call Zionism a crime against
humanity. He did not apologize, as he should have, but told a Danish
newspaper that he was misunderstood.
This was part of a concerted effort on part of Turkey to prevent
additional international criticism on this issue. Nevertheless, the
pressure was on Ankara, not Jerusalem.
Furthermore, an apology to a Hamas supporter, just a day after Hamas
again launched rockets against Israel, communicates terrible weakness.
Sanctioning an Erdogan victory trip to Gaza at this particular moment
is terribly foolish, too, particularly when Israel is seeking to
bolster the standing of the rival Palestinian Authority.
It is highly unlikely that we will see a reversal or a turnaround in
Turkey's anti-Western and anti- Israeli policies. The apology from
Jerusalem only enhances Turkish ambitions and weakens Israel's
deterrence.
Efraim Inbar is a professor of political studies at Bar-Ilan
University, the director of the Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for
Strategic Studies and a fellow at the Middle East Forum.
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-Ed-Contributors/Israels-apology-to-Turkey-was-a-mistake-307895
by Efraim Inbar
The Jerusalem Post
March 28, 2013
Israel's apology to Turkey for "operational errors" in the Mavi
Marmara incident is a diplomatic mistake both in terms of substance
and timing. It's hard to understand or justify Israel's weekend
apology to Turkey. While the use of Israeli force in the Mavi Marmara
"flotilla" incident was not very elegant, it was perfectly legitimate
- as the UN-appointed "Palmer Commission" unequivocally determined.
Moreover, the incident was a Turkish provocation that warrants a
Turkish apology, not an Israeli one.
Worse still, the hopes in Jerusalem for a new era in Israeli-Turkish
relations in exchange for the apology are simply illusory.
The Israeli apology will hardly stop Turkish Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan's regular Israel-bashing rhetoric. Nor has it secured a
clear Turkish commitment for the resumption of full diplomatic
relations.
Moreover, Erdogan already has conveyed his intention to visit
Hamas-ruled Gaza. Such a visit is a slap in the face to both Jerusalem
and Washington.
Turkey, under the AKP, an Islamist party, has gradually adopted a new
foreign policy, fueled by neo-Ottoman and Islamist impulses, whose
goal is to gain a leadership role in the Middle East and the Islamic
world.
Attaining this objective requires harsh criticism of Israel, which has
generated great popularity for Erdogan and Turkey. Unfortunately,
vicious attacks on Israel come easily for Erdogan, who is plainly and
simply an anti-Semite.
Israel has failed to fully grasp Turkey's new Islamist direction. For
several years already, we no longer have a pro-Western Turkey with
which Israel can cooperate in the turbulent Middle East. Ankara and
Jerusalem have very different views on a variety of issues. While
Turkey is truly an important and powerful player in regional politics,
its behavior over the past decade actually harms Israeli interests. It
does not follow the US policy on Iran and helps circumvent the
international sanctions imposed on Tehran. As a matter of fact, Turkey
helps Iran, a country with genocidal intentions toward Israel, to
progress in its nuclear program.
Turkey also sides with Hamas, an Islamist terrorist organization
dedicated to the destruction of the Jewish state, and helps it
entrench its rule in Gaza and gain international support and
recognition.
Turkey is also actively helping radical Islamic Sunni elements take
over Syria. It also supports the idea of violent opposition against
Israel's presence in the Golan Heights. As such, the hope that Israel
and Turkey can cooperate together with the US in limiting the damage
from a disintegrating Syria has little validity.
Furthermore, Turkey, still a NATO member, is obstructing the efforts
of Israel in developing its ties with this organization. The Turkish
position in NATO also hinders the Western alliance's ability to deal
more effectively with the Iranian nuclear challenge.
Turkey's policy in the Mediterranean similarly clashes with Israeli
vital interests. Its bullying of Cyprus interferes with Israel's plans
to export via this island its newly found gas riches to an energy-
thirsty Europe. Turkey, that sees itself as an energy bridge to
Europe, does not want the Israeli competition. It may even use
military force to maintain its role in the energy market.
What is also important is how the Israeli apology will be perceived in
a region whose prism on international relations is power politics.
Inevitably, Israel under Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu will be
seen as weak, bowing to American pressure. Public regrets about use of
force erode deterrence and project weakness.
Perceived weakness usually invites aggression in our tough neighborhood.
This is also what Ankara thinks, which is very problematic for Israel.
Moreover, Tehran and Cairo, both ruled by radical Islamists, cherish
the Turkish victory over the Zionist entity.
The Israeli-initiated apology is an American diplomatic success, but
reflects a dangerous American misperception of Turkey as representing
"moderate Islam," which is incredible naïve. Turkey is distancing
itself from the West and its values.
Nowadays, more journalists are in jail in Turkey than in China.
Israel's friends in Turkey, part of the democratic opposition, must be
bewildered as Israel hands Erdogan a diplomatic achievement,
buttressing the grip of the Islamist AKP on Turkish politics.
The timing is particularly troubling.
Turkish foreign policy is in crisis because its much-heralded approach
to the Middle East ("zero problems with its neighbors") is in
shambles. Turkey needed a diplomatic success here more than Israel
did. Israel could have negotiated a better formula to end the impasse
in bilateral relations.
Only very recently, we heard Erdogan call Zionism a crime against
humanity. He did not apologize, as he should have, but told a Danish
newspaper that he was misunderstood.
This was part of a concerted effort on part of Turkey to prevent
additional international criticism on this issue. Nevertheless, the
pressure was on Ankara, not Jerusalem.
Furthermore, an apology to a Hamas supporter, just a day after Hamas
again launched rockets against Israel, communicates terrible weakness.
Sanctioning an Erdogan victory trip to Gaza at this particular moment
is terribly foolish, too, particularly when Israel is seeking to
bolster the standing of the rival Palestinian Authority.
It is highly unlikely that we will see a reversal or a turnaround in
Turkey's anti-Western and anti- Israeli policies. The apology from
Jerusalem only enhances Turkish ambitions and weakens Israel's
deterrence.
Efraim Inbar is a professor of political studies at Bar-Ilan
University, the director of the Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for
Strategic Studies and a fellow at the Middle East Forum.
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-Ed-Contributors/Israels-apology-to-Turkey-was-a-mistake-307895