Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Christian exodus could fuel Middle East decline

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Christian exodus could fuel Middle East decline

    Postmedia Breaking News
    March 29, 2013 Friday


    Lawrence Solomon: Christian exodus could fuel Middle East decline

    FP COMMENT


    Christians in their millions are leaving Muslim lands, a heartbreak
    for the region's 12 million remaining Copts, Catholics, Chaldeans and
    other Christian communities, many of which predate Muslim communities.
    But their exodus also represents a great tragedy for the region's
    Muslims: The Middle East's Christians, with their free-wheeling,
    free-market orientation, have for centuries created prosperity in an
    otherwise stagnant Middle East; once the Christians are gone, an
    economic desolation is likely to revisit their historic homelands.

    Much of the Middle East today is known for its economic backwardness -
    only sub-Saharan Africa fares worse than the Arab world, according to
    the United Nations Arab Development Report. But it wasn't always so.
    When Europe was a backwater in the centuries following Christ's birth,
    the Christian Middle East was a splendour, its many peoples made the
    region among the world's richest and most vibrant. In the first few
    centuries following the Arab invasion of the Christian countries in
    the 7th century AD, when Crusaders from then-backward countries such
    as England and France tried to take back the Holy Lands, they were
    amazed at the opulence they found.

    The Crusaders ultimately failed in their Holy Wars and much of the
    Middle East would fall into disrepair under rule of the Ottoman Empire
    and the restraints of its Sharia Law. Christian Europe advanced,
    meanwhile, overtaking the Islamic lands in economic prowess by
    promoting individual liberty and capitalism, not least through the
    creation of joint stock companies, insurance and other financial
    innovations that furthered capital formation and international trade.

    Muslim merchants could not compete well. For one thing, the Ottomans
    were insular. Seeing themselves as superior and having little to learn
    from the West, they sent to the West few embassies that could further
    trade. For another, under Islamic law a Muslim couldn't settle
    disputes in the courts of infidels. This limitation handicapped
    Muslim-Christian business relations, particularly since under Islamic
    law the word of Muslims often trumped that of infidels, even when the
    infidels had documents to back up their claims. For a third, the
    laudable Islamic desire for equity required that upon death at least
    two-thirds of a Muslim estate be split among what are often numerous
    family members - children, wives, parents, siblings. This
    fragmentation of estates acted to thwart the continuance of family
    empires and other large business enterprises, typically leading Muslim
    enterprises to operate on a small scale.

    The Ottomans were enlightened, however, in adopting a largely
    hands-off policy toward their many non-Muslim minorities. Whenever a
    Muslim wasn't a party to a transaction, a Copt or Maronite Christian,
    or any minority for that matter, could freely enter into all manner of
    business arrangements and operate under the laws of any court the
    parties chose. With this wide array of structures on offer, and the
    freedom to choose, business deals were struck between non-Muslims in
    whatever way was least costly, least bureaucratic, and most secure.
    Sometimes deals would be structured along Western lines, sometimes
    along lines local to a Middle East community, sometimes even along
    Sharia lines - whatever best suited the parties. The effect was soon
    seen in the trading houses of the Middle East.

    In Beirut by the mid-1800s, entrepreneurial Christian families
    controlled virtually all of the trade with Europe. In the Turkish
    trading city of Trabzon by the late 1800s, more than 80% of both
    exporters and importers were local Christians, generally Greek or
    Armenian. By the early 1900s, although Muslims constituted about 80%
    of the Ottoman Empire and Christians less than 20%, Muslims played
    almost no role in trade with Europe and only a small role in trade
    within the Ottoman Empire - two-thirds of the local traders then were
    either Greeks or Armenians, just 15% were Muslim.

    Over the last century, the once-formidable Christian presence in the
    Middle East has ratcheted down down down, to now rest at 4% of the
    region's population. Armenians fled Turkey in the convulsions of the
    First World War. The 1950s saw the departure of Egypt's Greeks - the
    country's most affluent and influential minority - under the military
    dictatorship of Abdul Gamal Nasser. The Lebanese Christians then had
    their turn to suffer persecution, then the Christians of Iraq. Now the
    Arab Spring is leading to more convulsions, and to an inevitable
    further departure of Christians from their native lands. Even
    Bethlehem, Christ's very birthplace, has lost most of its Christians,
    and some predict it will lose the rest.

    The Arab Spring with its resurgence of Islamic fundamentalism is
    striking out one of the hopes for prosperity that the UN Arab report
    cited - the liberation of women and their enlistment into the
    workforce. The resurgence of fossil fuel production in the Western
    world is striking out the likelihood that high energy prices in future
    will sustain the Middle East's economies. The loss of the Middle
    East's Christians - the region's indispensable

Working...
X