Tweet
PERSPECTIVES OF SUNNITE CALIPHATE
Apparently the factors and arguments for the reproduction of a certain
pseudo-imperial formation in Eurasian around Russia or actually Russia
have worn out, and now the last haven for the Moscow imperialism is
the Sunnite caliphate as a threat to many countries and peoples. But
how serious are the arguments about the Sunnite caliphate, especially
under the aegis of the United States?
The Huntington doctrine on the fight of civilizations encountered an
irresistible and omnipresent thing - a severe struggle among certain
civilizations. This is taking place in the Catholic and Orthodox
worlds, a fatal fight is going on between the Sunnites and Shiites
which distracts mostly Sunnite states from national interests.
However, the major fight for recarving of borders and layout of
geopolitical configuration is taking place in the Sunnite world
and space.
Dreaming of the role of the Sunnite world leader, Turkey faced
ambiguous events and openly hostile attitude of leaders and outsiders
of Sunni Arab states. Sunnite Arab states are still having acute
controversies (sometimes in a sleeping mode). Look at Central Asia.
There are no Shiites, Christians, Buddhists, Confucians, countries
and people with common languages and cultures are torn by hostility.
Some Sunnite states still face conflicts among clans and tribes
which expose territorial integrity of some states. Certain projects
of leading Sunnite states of Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan, such
as those in Bosnia or Iraq, do not get assistance and support because
most outposts of the "caliphate" would like to keep to completely
different geopolitical and socio-cultural aspects. These projects are
rather relating to national ambitions of these leading states rather
than the idea of caliphate.
In addition, the United States is carrying out a total policy of
division, fragmentation and formatting of giant spaces. In addition,
the current U.S. doctrine is determined by the lack of means and
levers of influence rather than their strength. The partners of
the United States in the Near East, including Israel, have already
understood this.
The establishment of a Sunnite caliphate under the aegis of the
United States is one of the propaganda-oriented scenarios, which is
wholly fiction. The promoters of this scenario have not answered the
question why the Americans would need to do this. Or is the United
States making the next fatal mistake?
The United States is using occasional conflicts and ambitions of
Sunnite elites to resolve local and complex geopolitical issues. There
is no doubt that Washington's official statements state the goals and
objectives of the United States differently but which state is more
honest? The global goal of the United States is not an integrated
but a fragmental state, prevention of strengthening global centers of
force, even in regard to their partners. Separate clusters of Sunnite
radicalism are activated in each geopolitical aspect, not the idea of
"caliphate".
Let us assume that Russia will be designated or will choose the
role of saving someone from the caliphate. Which countries will
appear under its control, the countries of the Sunnite area? So,
what is awaiting Russia - a lasting war with the Caliphate on its
own territory or the territory its holds under control? Following the
insolent and mercantile behavior of Moscow, a real den, it is hard to
imagine that it would be ready for such large-scale resistance. The
Russian elites would like to be Americanized and prefer not to fly
the Russian civil aviation planes while their children study at the
universities of North America and Europe.
There are threats and risks and they are well-identified, and
specifically and professionally stated agreements between current and
potential partners are needed to eliminate those threats rather than
unsuccessful propaganda flying somewhere in the clouds. Modern Russia
is still a young power because it does not have sufficient experience
of strategic and tactical studies. All the 22 years of independent
existence of Russia is all faults, failures and deliberate betrayals
in foreign policy.
Now the ruling elite has apparently decided that in-house problems
have been resolved, and it is time to deal with outer space. Not bad!
However, it needs to be solid, taking into account the realities but
not take their fantasy for reality and in addition to this mislead
their "brother" nations. Apparently, it is allowed to gag their
society but not their brotherly nations.
Calls are made to make a choice between the British approach of
interests or the Russian approach of brotherhood. How about us? What
have we been doing over the past 23 years? Have we been engaged in
brotherhood which turned out to be buddy-buddy and hangout in nature?
In fact, any doctrine should first be tried out and adapted to
the one's own national contingent before exporting it, furthermore
combining it with elements of blatant blackmail.
Igor Muradyan 18:08 04/06/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/30035
Apparently the factors and arguments for the reproduction of a certain
pseudo-imperial formation in Eurasian around Russia or actually Russia
have worn out, and now the last haven for the Moscow imperialism is
the Sunnite caliphate as a threat to many countries and peoples. But
how serious are the arguments about the Sunnite caliphate, especially
under the aegis of the United States?
The Huntington doctrine on the fight of civilizations encountered an
irresistible and omnipresent thing - a severe struggle among certain
civilizations. This is taking place in the Catholic and Orthodox
worlds, a fatal fight is going on between the Sunnites and Shiites
which distracts mostly Sunnite states from national interests.
However, the major fight for recarving of borders and layout of
geopolitical configuration is taking place in the Sunnite world
and space.
Dreaming of the role of the Sunnite world leader, Turkey faced
ambiguous events and openly hostile attitude of leaders and outsiders
of Sunni Arab states. Sunnite Arab states are still having acute
controversies (sometimes in a sleeping mode). Look at Central Asia.
There are no Shiites, Christians, Buddhists, Confucians, countries
and people with common languages and cultures are torn by hostility.
Some Sunnite states still face conflicts among clans and tribes
which expose territorial integrity of some states. Certain projects
of leading Sunnite states of Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan, such
as those in Bosnia or Iraq, do not get assistance and support because
most outposts of the "caliphate" would like to keep to completely
different geopolitical and socio-cultural aspects. These projects are
rather relating to national ambitions of these leading states rather
than the idea of caliphate.
In addition, the United States is carrying out a total policy of
division, fragmentation and formatting of giant spaces. In addition,
the current U.S. doctrine is determined by the lack of means and
levers of influence rather than their strength. The partners of
the United States in the Near East, including Israel, have already
understood this.
The establishment of a Sunnite caliphate under the aegis of the
United States is one of the propaganda-oriented scenarios, which is
wholly fiction. The promoters of this scenario have not answered the
question why the Americans would need to do this. Or is the United
States making the next fatal mistake?
The United States is using occasional conflicts and ambitions of
Sunnite elites to resolve local and complex geopolitical issues. There
is no doubt that Washington's official statements state the goals and
objectives of the United States differently but which state is more
honest? The global goal of the United States is not an integrated
but a fragmental state, prevention of strengthening global centers of
force, even in regard to their partners. Separate clusters of Sunnite
radicalism are activated in each geopolitical aspect, not the idea of
"caliphate".
Let us assume that Russia will be designated or will choose the
role of saving someone from the caliphate. Which countries will
appear under its control, the countries of the Sunnite area? So,
what is awaiting Russia - a lasting war with the Caliphate on its
own territory or the territory its holds under control? Following the
insolent and mercantile behavior of Moscow, a real den, it is hard to
imagine that it would be ready for such large-scale resistance. The
Russian elites would like to be Americanized and prefer not to fly
the Russian civil aviation planes while their children study at the
universities of North America and Europe.
There are threats and risks and they are well-identified, and
specifically and professionally stated agreements between current and
potential partners are needed to eliminate those threats rather than
unsuccessful propaganda flying somewhere in the clouds. Modern Russia
is still a young power because it does not have sufficient experience
of strategic and tactical studies. All the 22 years of independent
existence of Russia is all faults, failures and deliberate betrayals
in foreign policy.
Now the ruling elite has apparently decided that in-house problems
have been resolved, and it is time to deal with outer space. Not bad!
However, it needs to be solid, taking into account the realities but
not take their fantasy for reality and in addition to this mislead
their "brother" nations. Apparently, it is allowed to gag their
society but not their brotherly nations.
Calls are made to make a choice between the British approach of
interests or the Russian approach of brotherhood. How about us? What
have we been doing over the past 23 years? Have we been engaged in
brotherhood which turned out to be buddy-buddy and hangout in nature?
In fact, any doctrine should first be tried out and adapted to
the one's own national contingent before exporting it, furthermore
combining it with elements of blatant blackmail.
Igor Muradyan 18:08 04/06/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/30035