Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Karbakh Conflict Not Negotiated?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Karbakh Conflict Not Negotiated?

    KARBAKH CONFLICT NOT NEGOTIATED?

    A1+
    12-07-2005

    We had a conversation on the Karabakh conflict settlement with chairman
    of the NA for foreign affairs Armen Rustamyan.

    -How do you assess the package that was recently issued by the
    Co-Chairs, according to which Armenia will return 5 Azeri regions
    under the condition of conduction a referendum in 10-15 years?

    -First, I think it's premature to give any precise assessment, since
    the matter concerns the whole package while a summed up estimation
    can be given only in case of awareness of all its constituents.
    Certainly, it's good if we find a compromise, since the principal
    task now is to find the correct format of concessions. During the
    recent hearings we highlighted several important points. First,
    the status of Nagorno Karabakh should be determined on the basis of
    the right of self-determination, the security guarantees should be
    absolute. It means that with receiving the status Karabakh should
    receive security at international level.

    -What do you think about conduction of a referendum?

    -Positively. Taking into account that one referendum has been
    already held I do not think that conduction of another referendum
    would conflict with our position. The second referendum will mean
    recognition of the right of self-determination.

    -Is Armenia empowered to take any decisions in the negotiation
    process if it has not recognized Karabakh's independence de jure yet?
    -Certainly, Armenia does not have ultimate right to make decisions.
    Armenia can represent Karabakh in the structure, where NKR was not
    represented due to its being unrecognized. It is natural and logical.
    Armenia can act for Karabakh if the matter concerns the latter's
    joining Armenia. In this case Karabakh's participation is not
    necessary. If Azerbaijan agrees on Karabakh's joining Armenia the
    issue can be settled in two ways - declaration of independence or
    unification. The Key West negotiations were held with this logic.
    Later the conflict was stated as one between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
    It lasted for rather along time and now we face the task to change
    the erroneous opinion on the international community.

    -Don't you think that the incumbent authorities provoked this erroneous
    opinion by separating Karabakh from the negotiation process?

    -First, Karabakh was not separated, second, the process can hardly
    be stated as negotiations. The current developments can be called
    consultations, while negotiations imply participation of all the
    parties to conflict. First of all the conflicting parties should
    recognize each other as such. If now Azerbaijan does not recognize
    Karabakh the process will be doomed to failure. It will mean that
    Azerbaijan refuses from talks.

    -The armistice was concluded with the participation of Karabakh,
    wasn't it?

    - Yes, due to this very reason we say that the logic should be
    preserved. No negotiation process is possible without the participation
    of Karabakh.

    -What but negotiations can be called the meetings in Key West and
    other Kocharyan-Aliyev meetings?

    -Those were consultations at a high level with the purpose to find a
    solution for the Karabakh conflict. Negotiations can lead to peaceful
    agreement and they will start when the parties sit at the bargaining
    table.
Working...
X