Tweet
RUSSIA DEPLOYED 11TH RED ARMY IN ARMENIA
It's Not Capitulation, It's Occupation Capitulation supposes at least
insignificant resistance which enables a deal on something significant.
The Russians sold a controversial paper that did not contain anything
significant, and nothing significant has been offered in return for
it. All these comments in the form of doles are just nonsense. Serzh
Sargsyan has understood that he did not receive a significant
support of the West in the possible conflict with Russia and chose
a semi-decision, thereby condemning the country to a marginal and
miserable existence.
NATO and the European Union demanded crucial decisions but they did
not offer enough participation in economic and security issues.
However, apparently this is not the issue because the West's proposals
to the Armenian government have never been realistic. The problem is
not in the West.
Russia has not undertaken "pressure" in any usual form. Russia has
just announced about its highly hostile attitude to Armenia, which
means full support to Armenia's opponents.
Our country has appeared in a highly dangerous situation having Russia,
a hostile and aggressive state, ready for anything for the military
defeat of Armenia.
Now it is absolutely clear that having earned good money on supply
of arms to Azerbaijan Russia has created all the conditions for a
rude and brazen blackmail of Armenia.
What pressure is meant? Practically, Russia has deployed the 11th
red army in Armenia, bypassing Azerbaijan.
It could be called an occupation when Armenia is deprived of
sovereignty. One can expect a dictate to hand over Karabakh to
Azerbaijan.
Where will this lead to in Armenia, obedience and another stage of
apologetics of Russia's policy?
Nevertheless, one could run a big risk and continue cooperation with
the West. Now, whatever happens to the relations with the West,
the priority has failed, and Serzh Sargsyan who lacked confidence
in his own kingdom had to go on capitulation. At the same time,
the possibility to reach new conditions of security has been missed.
Who would deal with such a state? The palliative policy never ended
in success.
Igor Muradyan 11:35 04/09/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/30805
It's Not Capitulation, It's Occupation Capitulation supposes at least
insignificant resistance which enables a deal on something significant.
The Russians sold a controversial paper that did not contain anything
significant, and nothing significant has been offered in return for
it. All these comments in the form of doles are just nonsense. Serzh
Sargsyan has understood that he did not receive a significant
support of the West in the possible conflict with Russia and chose
a semi-decision, thereby condemning the country to a marginal and
miserable existence.
NATO and the European Union demanded crucial decisions but they did
not offer enough participation in economic and security issues.
However, apparently this is not the issue because the West's proposals
to the Armenian government have never been realistic. The problem is
not in the West.
Russia has not undertaken "pressure" in any usual form. Russia has
just announced about its highly hostile attitude to Armenia, which
means full support to Armenia's opponents.
Our country has appeared in a highly dangerous situation having Russia,
a hostile and aggressive state, ready for anything for the military
defeat of Armenia.
Now it is absolutely clear that having earned good money on supply
of arms to Azerbaijan Russia has created all the conditions for a
rude and brazen blackmail of Armenia.
What pressure is meant? Practically, Russia has deployed the 11th
red army in Armenia, bypassing Azerbaijan.
It could be called an occupation when Armenia is deprived of
sovereignty. One can expect a dictate to hand over Karabakh to
Azerbaijan.
Where will this lead to in Armenia, obedience and another stage of
apologetics of Russia's policy?
Nevertheless, one could run a big risk and continue cooperation with
the West. Now, whatever happens to the relations with the West,
the priority has failed, and Serzh Sargsyan who lacked confidence
in his own kingdom had to go on capitulation. At the same time,
the possibility to reach new conditions of security has been missed.
Who would deal with such a state? The palliative policy never ended
in success.
Igor Muradyan 11:35 04/09/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/30805