Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Putin In Armenia: The View From Moscow

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Putin In Armenia: The View From Moscow

    PUTIN IN ARMENIA: THE VIEW FROM MOSCOW

    Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
    Dec 3 2013

    3 December 2013 - 11:28am

    Victoria Panfilova, an NG commentator, exclusively for Vestnik Kavkaza

    Yesterday, Armenia welcomed Russian President Vladimir Putin. The
    visit had been planned a long time ago, almost from the day of Putin's
    inauguration. However, he took a long time to arrive. The strategic
    partners had one problem - Armenia decided to sign an association
    agreement with the EU. This was supposed to happen at the Eastern
    Partnership summit in Vilnius. Moscow had to wait and see what friendly
    Yerevan did, and the visit could wait.

    Armenia's behavior was easy to explain. It couldn't make Russia to
    give a two-billion credit to Yerevan on economic development. Moscow's
    promises to help were insulting in the context of generous grants to
    unstable Kyrgyzstan which received Russian aid, but often acted not
    in Russian interests. Moreover, ignoring of Armenia in the context of
    the Customs Union was insulting as well, even though Yerevan stated
    about its interest, it didn't receive an invitation.

    At the same time, association with the EU was developed in detail by
    Armenia. The agreement contained to military component; a political
    component was minimal. In short, Armenia would have got simplification
    of the visa regime and a free trade zone, would have been obliged
    to conduct management reforms, according to European standards. On
    the other hand, Russia would have got rid of a troublesome relative
    who annoyed Russia with its demands for help. At the same time,
    Russia would have maintained its military influence and would have
    lost an insignificant part of its political influence. However, it
    seemed Moscow didn't like the scenario. Probably Yerevan received some
    guarantees secretly, because during Serge Sargsyan's visit to Moscow
    association with the EU wasn't discussed and Armenian President stated
    that Armenia would join the Customs Union. By the time, it was clear
    that Belarus was indifferent to such extension of the alliance, while
    Kazakhstan was against it. Different views on the issue were made up
    at the 10th Russian-Kazakhstan Interregional Summit in Yekaterinburg
    in November.

    What guarantees Yerevan could receive, making choice in favor of the
    Customs Union, we found out during Vladimir Putin's visit to Yerevan on
    December 2nd. Armenia will get Russian gas for internal Russian prices,
    as well as arms; cooperation will be intensified; and investments and
    a series of economic projects are promised to the nuclear and security
    spheres. Isn't it sufficient? It is sufficient, if it becomes true.

    The Karabakh problem. Vladimir Putin said that blood shouldn't be
    shed anymore and welcomed restoration of contacts between Azerbaijan
    and Armenia at the top level. The statement seems to be adequate and
    reasonable. Yerevan should be happy. Moreover, "Russia will make the
    process of Armenia's accession to the CU most effective." A road map
    may be signed on December 24th.

    Vladimir Putin stated that Russia intends to improve positions in
    the South Caucasus, and it would reasonable to think that it relies
    on its strategic partner, first of all. It also seems to be alright
    for Armenia.

    However, in Yerevan strange developments took place on Monday, to put
    it mildly. A group which calls itself 'Dignified Motherland' decided
    to meet Russian President by an action which had to make it clear
    that Russian President is not welcomed in Armenia. The group includes
    the opposition Armenian party Heritage; it has pro-Western views and
    believes that the choice in favor of the Customs Union was made by the
    authorities because of Russia's pressure, i.e. it was interference in
    Armenian internal affairs. The politicians and social activists held
    their protest with mottos on prevention of the country's colonization.

    Probably, the hundred or so people deserved no attention, but for
    several circumstances. It is inadequate to shout about Moscow's
    pressure on Yerevan: according to Gellapa public opinion polls,
    about 70% Armenian population stands for the CU. Did the authorities
    falsify the data, as the opposition stated? Why didn't the opposition
    present other data? Are initiators of anti-Russian protests ready to
    be responsible before the Armenian nation and history for consequences
    which will follow a break-up between Armenia and Russia? It seems to me
    they are not able to think in such a way, if they forgot hospitability
    rules, especially considering the fact that Armenia has many times
    invited the Russian president to come.

    http://vestnikkavkaza.net/articles/politics/48229.html

Working...
X