Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Elmar Mammadyarov: Territorial integrity of Azerbaijan is not a topi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Elmar Mammadyarov: Territorial integrity of Azerbaijan is not a topi

    Elmar Mammadyarov: Territorial integrity of Azerbaijan is not a topic
    for discussion

    Thursday, May 8, 16:55

    The territorial integrity of Azerbaijan is not a topic for discussion
    and withdrawal of Armenian forces from the "occupied territories" was
    the main condition for settlement of the conflict, Azerbaijan's
    Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov said at today's press-conference
    when commenting on the six principles offered by the American co-chair
    of the OSCE Minsk Group, James Warlick, as Azerbaijani mass media
    reported.

    He also added that "these 6 principles have been previously
    announced.He said that the Azerbaijani side supports the development
    of a peace agreement: "The status quo is unacceptable. The status quo
    is unacceptable for the Armenians as well, the country is not
    developing and it faces demographic challenges. We call on the
    Armenian side to solve this issue."

    On 8 May The U.S. Co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group, James Warlick,
    made a speech at the Carnegie Endowment in Washington, and unveiled
    proposals from international mediators to resolve the Karabakh
    conflict. He called on the parties to take decisive steps and actions
    to achieve peace. According to him proposals for settlement are at
    the negotiating table, and the parties should be guided by them.

    At the heart of a deal are the UN Charter and relevant documents and
    the core principles of the Helsinki Final Act. In particular, we focus
    on those principles and commitments that pertain to 4 the non-use or
    threat of force, territorial integrity, and equal rights and
    self-determination of peoples.
    Building on that foundation, there are six elements that will have to
    be part of any peace agreement if it is to endure. While the
    sequencing and details of these elements remains the subject of
    negotiations, they must be seen as an integrated whole. Any attempt to
    select some elements over others will make it impossible to achieve a
    balanced solution.

    In no particular order, these elements are:
    First, in light of Nagorno-Karabakh's complex history, the sides
    should commit to determining its final legal status through a mutually
    agreed and legally binding expression of will in the future. This is
    not optional. Interim status will be temporary.

    Second, the area within the boundaries of the former Nagorno-Karabakh
    Autonomous Region that is not controlled by Baku should be granted an
    interim status that, at a minimum, provides guarantees for security
    and self-governance.

    Third, the occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh should be
    returned to Azerbaijani control. There can be no settlement without
    respect for Azerbaijan's sovereignty, and the recognition that its
    sovereignty over these territories must be restored.
    Fourth , there should be a corridor linking Armenia to
    Nagorno-Karabakh. It must be wide enough to provide secure passage,
    but it cannot encompass the whole of Lachin district.

    Fifth, an enduring settlement will have to recognize the right of all
    IDPs and refugees to return to their former places of residence.

    Sixth and finally, a settlement must include international security
    guarantees that would include a peacekeeping operation.

    We intend to continue working through the Minsk Group as the primary
    channel for resolving this conflict, Warlick said.

    http://www.arminfo.am/index.cfm?objectid=6D238780-D6B0-11E3-81C10EB7C0D21663


    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X