Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ISTANBUL: Turkey sees unprecedented division, conflicts under AK Par

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ISTANBUL: Turkey sees unprecedented division, conflicts under AK Par

    Today's Zaman, Turkey
    Jan 10 2015

    Turkey sees unprecedented division, conflicts under AK Party rule

    January 10, 2015, Saturday/ 17:00:00/ MUHSÄ°N Ã-ZTÃ`RK/ MURAT TOKAY/ / ISTANBUL

    The Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government, which came to
    power in 2002 with an all-embracing and pro-democracy discourse vowing
    to respect society's diversity, has, after its 12-year-old rule, ended
    up being one of the most divisive and polarizing governments in the
    history of the Turkish Republic, something that could be seen clearly
    in the conflicts among various groups and even members of the same
    family in the country.

    The divisions in the society, fomented by the AK Party government and
    its former leader and current President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄ?an, became
    more visible following the Gezi Park protests in summer 2013 and graft
    probes that became public in December 2013.

    The Gezi Park protests began on May 28, 2013 initially to oppose the
    urban development plan for Ä°stanbul's Gezi Park. The protests were
    sparked by outrage when the protesters conducting a sit-in in the park
    were violently forced out by riot police. Subsequently, supporting
    protests and clashes took place across Turkey protesting plenty of
    other concerns. The protests quickly spread to the whole country and
    evolved into anti-government protests.

    Back then, ErdoÄ?an, who was then prime minister, refused to ease the
    tensions. Describing the protestors as `looters,' ErdoÄ?an said he was
    having a difficult time of keeping 50 percent of society, i.e., his
    voter base, in their homes. He also tried to stigmatize the protestors
    on many occasions.

    One incident was frequently referred to by ErdoÄ?an in an attempt to
    portray the protesters as being hooligans. It was claimed that an
    attack on a headscarved woman happened in KabataÅ? on June 1, 2013
    during the protests. However, video footage released of the Gezi Park
    protests refuted this claim.

    In another attempt to stigmatize the Gezi protestors, ErdoÄ?an had also
    accused them of drinking alcohol in a mosque. The mosque story was
    also later found to be untrue, thereby damaging ErdoÄ?an's credibility.
    In leaked video footage, the demonstrators who sought refuge in a
    mosque appeared to have sustained injuries and were wounded. The imam
    of the mosque apparently opened the doors of the mosque to those
    running away from the police seeking refuge.

    Following the Dec. 17 and 25 graft probes' going public in 2013, in
    which some government-affiliated figures were implicated, ErdoÄ?an, who
    described the probes as a `coup attempt' against his government,
    referred to those asking for an investigation of the corruption claims
    as the `others.'

    Conflict among the religious

    Turkey is used to seeing conflicts between its religious and secular
    circles; however, for the first time in the country's history, a
    conflict has emerged among religious groups in the society based on
    their perception of the graft allegations.

    The AK Party government, which received the support of the faith-based
    Hizmet movement for years, launched a battle against it following the
    Dec.17 incidents, accusing the movement of establishing a parallel
    state within the state and masterminding the corruption probes.

    On many occasions, ErdoÄ?an has used derogatory remarks for the
    followers of the Hizmet movement such as `virus,' `hashashin,' `gang,'
    etc. The hatred fomented by the government in society also had
    repercussions among society's members and relations between members of
    the same family or relatives have been damaged.

    Journalists, academics divided

    The Gezi Park protests and Dec. 17 graft probe led to fragmentation
    among journalists and academics who used to support the AK Party
    government until the beginning of the party's third term in power,
    which began in 2011.

    Journalists who did not agree with the government labels for the Gezi
    Park protests and the graft probes as `attempted coups' were sacked
    from pro-government media outlets. For instance, Yeni Å?afak writers
    Murat MenteÅ?, IÅ?ın Eliçin, Murat Aksoy, KürÅ?at Bumin and Süleyman
    Gündüz left their jobs at the paper due to a disagreement with the
    paper's publication policy to refer to Gezi Park protests and graft
    probes as a `coup attempt.'

    Columnists Mustafa Akyol and Sedat Laçiner from the pro-government
    Star daily shared the same fate, while columnists such as Gülay
    Göktürk, Ahmet TaÅ?getiren, Etyen Mahçupyan, Leyla Ä°pekçi and Atilla
    Yayla, who used to write for the Zaman and Bugün newspapers, which are
    affiliated with the Hizmet movement, left these papers and were
    immediately employed by pro-government dailies Sabah, Star, AkÅ?am and
    Yeni Å?afak.

    Dozens of other journalists have lost their jobs due to their
    criticism of the government.

    Young Civilians split up

    Even the anti-militarist, anti-coup civil society group Young
    Civilians (Genç Siviller) saw division in its ranks following the
    graft probe's going public. Turgay OÄ?ur and Yıldıray OÄ?ur, two
    brothers who are among the group's founders, fell into opposite camps.
    While Yıldıray, along with activists Ceren Kenar and Erkan Å?en, chose
    to take sides with the AK Party government, Turgay, along with
    activists Fatih Demirci and Nurcan ÇalıÅ?kan, refused to back the
    government's anti-democratic actions, and they cut their ties with the
    group.

    Commenting on his departure from the Young Civilians, Turgay OÄ?ur said
    during an interview with the Radikal daily: `I made efforts for the
    Young Civilians for years. I made many sacrifices. Including the job I
    do today to make a living, I have not had any financial gain for being
    a part of this group. To the contrary, I was seen as a little bit
    dangerous. Despite this, I took my jacket and left the Young
    Civilians. On Dec. 17, I understood that everyone is an enemy of the
    Hizmet movement. People I thought were very close wrote on social
    media mockingly that the Young Civilians' pro-Hizmet wing had been
    eliminated.'

    Armenians divided, too

    The polarization in society has also hit Turkish-Armenians. Following
    the Dec.17 graft probe, Turkish-Armenian columnist Etyen Mahçupyan
    parted ways with the Zaman daily for which he wrote for years and
    began to write for the pro-government AkÅ?am daily. With another
    Turkish-Armenian writer, Markar Esayan, who began to write for the
    pro-government Yeni Å?afak daily, Mahçupyan took part with those who
    claimed that the Dec.17 probe was a `coup attempt' against the
    government.

    Mahçupyan even became an advisor of Prime Minister Ahmet DavutoÄ?lu who
    was appointed to the helm of the AK Party following ErdoÄ?an's election
    to the presidency last summer. Yet, another well-known
    Turkish-Armenian writer Hayko BaÄ?dat, who writes for the Taraf daily,
    continued to direct criticism at the AK Party on many occasions.

    Carrot and sticks used for business world

    The business world also received its share from the polarized
    atmosphere in the country. It is no secret that business organizations
    that comply with government policies are given privileges in public
    tenders, while there is discrimination against companies and
    businessmen who criticize government acts.

    The government has not denied the existence of documents showing that
    it profiled companies that are members of the Turkish Confederation of
    Businessmen and Industrialists (TUSKON), which is affiliated with the
    Hizmet movement.

    There is a boycott under way against these companies. Moreover, the
    government is trying to discourage members of the confederation from
    engaging in commercial activities through frequent inspections.

    The Turkish Industrialists and Businessmen's Association (TÃ`SÄ°AD) was
    also placed on the government's target list after TÃ`SÄ°AD President
    Haluk Dinçer expressed in a recent newspaper interview his
    disagreement with a number of government policies. He said he does not
    see any `parallel structure' within the state, as is asserted by
    pro-government circles, that there is no impartial and independent
    judiciary in Turkey and that TÃ`SÄ°AD does not believe that the Gezi
    protests and the Dec. 17 investigations were `coup attempts' against
    the government.

    A columnist from the pro-government Sabah daily, Okan MüderrisoÄ?lu,
    was quick to target the organization and said, `Failing to take a
    stance with ErdoÄ?an, TÃ`SÄ°AD may turn into parallel structure.'


    http://www.todayszaman.com/national_turkey-sees-unprecedented-division-conflicts-under-ak-party-rule_369290.html


    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X