Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Amal Clooney attracts attention at Armenian genocide trial

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Amal Clooney attracts attention at Armenian genocide trial

    Al-Monitor
    Jan 31 2015

    Amal Clooney attracts attention at Armenian genocide trial

    Author: Semih Idiz
    Posted January 30, 2015

    The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) brought a unique cast of
    characters together this week in a high-stakes case for Turkey and
    Armenia that also attracted the attention of the entertainment media.
    At the center of the stage was Amal Clooney, the renowned human rights
    lawyer in the limelight because of her marriage to actor George
    Clooney.



    The case being heard in Strasbourg, where Clooney is representing
    Armenia, centers on the hotly debated genocide Armenians say Ottoman
    Turks perpetrated a century ago against 1.5 million of their forbears.

    The Armenian claim, though it has significant international political
    and academic support, is nevertheless questioned by the Turkish
    judiciary in terms of the strict legal definition of genocide. Turkey
    officially denies the claim, although it acknowledges that hundreds of
    thousands of Armenians were among the millions of Ottomans killed
    during World War I.

    The case in Strasbourg is the result of an appeal by Switzerland to
    the ECHR's Grand Chamber, after a previous ECHR ruling that the right
    of Dogu Perincek, the leader of the Turkish Workers Party, to express
    his views freely had been violated by a Swiss court. In 2007, a court
    in Lausanne sentenced Perincek to 120 days in prison (but converted
    the sentence to a fine of 17,000 Swiss francs, or about $21,250) after
    Armenian organizations complained he had violated Swiss laws against
    racial discrimination when he denied that genocide had been
    perpetrated against Armenians during a 2005 conference.

    A majority of Turks accept the official Turkish explanation of the
    events of 1915 and believe, like Perincek, that the genocide claim is
    part of a hidden agenda by Armenia to grab land from Turkey with
    support from "imperial Western powers." Vengeance killings by Armenian
    terrorists of a large number of Turkish diplomats over the past three
    decades have also colored Turkish perceptions on the topic. The number
    of Turks who openly say genocide was perpetrated against Armenians has
    nevertheless increased in recent years.

    Perincek applied to the ECHR in 2008 to defend his right to free
    speech under the European Convention on Human Rights. Turkey became
    party to the case in 2010. The ECHR upheld Perincek's argument against
    Switzerland in 2013. Armenia is also a party to the appeal and
    maintains that the initial ruling against Switzerland has legal and
    factual errors.

    The first hearing of the appeal was held on Jan. 29, during which the
    attention of the international media was focused more on Clooney than
    the case itself. Reporters and paparazzi thronged Strasbourg, turning
    the court into what some commentators referred to as a "circus."

    Meanwhile, a group of flag-waving Turks gathered outside the
    courtroom, while strange bedfellows Egemen Bagis, from the ruling
    Justice and Development Party -- in the news for corruption allegations
    -- and Deniz Baykal, the former head of the main opposition Republican
    People's Party (CHP), sat side by side in a show of support for
    Perincek.

    Perincek is a controversial "lone wolf" Turkish politician who began
    his career in the 1960s as a committed communist, which landed him in
    prison on a number of occasions, but has turned into a staunch
    supporter of Kemalist nationalism and secularism.

    He received a life sentence in the 2013 Ergenekon case for allegedly
    trying to illegally topple the Islamist government of Prime Minister
    Recep Tayyip Erdogan, but was released last year after the special
    court that convicted him was abolished.

    Flanked by her boss, Geoffrey Robertson, Clooney based her argument on
    the 1920 Sevres Treaty, which the Ottomans were forced to sign by the
    victorious allies after World War I. She said the Ottoman government
    had undertaken to punish those guilty of the Armenian massacres but
    had not fulfilled its promise. Clooney also brought up Turkey's poor
    record on freedom of the press and freedom of expression, clearly
    trying to point out the irony of Ankara's demand for freedoms it
    itself violates.

    Perincek, for his part, did not deny Armenians had been massacred, but
    insisted again that the claim of genocide was a fabrication. He
    recalled that Britain, after World War I, had dropped the case against
    Ottoman officials accused of involvement in Armenian massacres due to
    lack of evidence.

    His lawyer, on the other hand, underlined that Perincek had not been
    convicted in either France or Germany for repeating his views, and
    declared that his client was a committed and lifelong fighter against
    racial discrimination.

    Taking the stand, the lawyer representing Turkey noted that
    Switzerland does not officially recognize the events of 1915 as a
    genocide, and said denial of the Armenian genocide could not be
    equated with denial of the Holocaust, the existence of which has been
    established legally.

    Riza Turmen, a former ECHR judge who is currently a deputy with the
    CHP, believes that Perincek's case remains strong because he
    restricted his arguments to freedom of expression, while the opposite
    side tried to concentrate on the genocide claim.

    "Perincek did not deny that Armenians were massacred. He merely
    pointed out that there was no legal ruling concerning the nature of
    the massacres," Turmen told Al-Monitor, pointing out that "genocide"
    is a precisely defined legal term. He added that the Grand Chamber is
    likely to uphold the initial court ruling.

    Taha Akyol, a prominent columnist and former jurist, told Al-Monitor
    that the arguments presented by Clooney in Strasbourg were rhetorical
    and legally meaningless.

    "The Treaty of Sevres was superseded by the Treaty of Lausanne and
    therefore has no legal validity," Akyol said, referring to the treaty
    signed in 1923, following Turkey's war of independence, which
    established the Turkish Republic.

    Akyol said Clooney's reference to the state of press freedom and
    freedom of expression in Turkey was also irrelevant, and was an
    attempt to influence the court. "Whatever the state of press freedom
    and freedom of expression in Turkey may be, this does not take away
    Perincek's right to express himself freely in Switzerland or anywhere
    else," he said.

    Akyol added that the ECHR, in its ruling against Switzerland, did not
    say the Armenian genocide did not happen. "It said that unlike the
    case with the Nazis and the Holocaust, this has not been established
    legally, leaving the topic open to debate. And that is what Turkey is
    calling for, an objective historic debate on the subject." Akyol said.

    Kamer Kasim, an expert on Armenia from the Ankara-based International
    Strategic Research Organization, also believes Turkey's hand is
    strong, and indicates that the current case holds risks for Armenia.
    Kasim told Al-Monitor, "Barring unforeseen political factors coming
    into play, there is a chance that the appeal will be rejected. This
    will set a disastrous precedent for Armenia." He added, "Even if
    Armenia's hand is weak legally, it had no choice but to support the
    appeal. Otherwise, it would mean it accepts the ruling about the right
    to deny the genocide." Kasim also maintained that Clooney's presence
    at the court was part of an attempt by Armenia to attract the
    attention of the international media and influence the court against
    Turkey.

    Analysts also point to a 2011 decision by the French Constitutional
    Court, which they say further strengthens Turkey's hand. The high
    court in France nullified a law passed by the French parliament that
    would have criminalized denial of the Armenian genocide, saying it
    violated the freedom of expression.

    The Grand Chamber in Strasbourg is expected to rule in six months on
    the appeal by Switzerland. In the meantime, the centenary -- to be
    commemorated on April 24 -- of the genocide Armenians say was
    perpetrated against them by Ottoman Turks is approaching fast.

    A resolution to what historians have called the longest feud of the
    century, however, appears no nearer.


    http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/01/turkey-armenia-switzerland-genocide-perincek.html

Working...
X