Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bridging The Bosporus: 'Turkey Has Always Represented A DifferentCon

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bridging The Bosporus: 'Turkey Has Always Represented A DifferentCon

    BRIDGING THE BOSPORUS: 'TURKEY HAS ALWAYS REPRESENTED A DIFFERENT CONTINENT'
    by Peter Goodspeed

    National Post (Canada)
    October 3, 2005 Monday
    National Edition

    Lined with tea gardens, Ottoman villas and ancient fortresses,
    the straits twist and turn for 35 kilometres, linking the Sea of
    Marmara to the Black Sea. With an intoxicating mix of splendour,
    simple beauty and cruel history, this sliver of Turkey has become
    one of the world's great cultural frontiers.

    This is where the Orient meets the Occident, where Christianity
    encounters Islam, where tradition collides with modernity -- a bustling
    crossroads to Europe and the Balkans, the Middle East and the Caucasus.

    Now, the straits and all of Turkey are about to become the focus of
    an intense international debate as diplomats prepare to negotiate
    Turkey's application for membership in the European Union.

    The talks, scheduled to get underway in Luxembourg today barring a
    last-minute veto by Austria, which opposes full EU membership for
    Turkey, could last a decade. By the time they end, neither Europe
    nor Turkey will be the same.

    Turkey's application to join the EU is already forcing Europe to
    question its identity as never before. EU members are struggling
    to define their future, while juggling centuries-old fears against
    new ambitions.

    Even as diplomats debate the terms of Turkey's entry, Europe has been
    swept by a bitter public backlash against the move.

    Last spring's rejection of the EU's draft constitution by voters in
    France and the Netherlands was said to be fuelled by fears of Turkey
    joining Europe.

    More recently, an opinion poll carried out by the European Commission
    claims 52% of Europeans are opposed to letting Turkey join their
    club. Only 35% agree.

    Seventy per cent of French voters, almost three-quarters of Germans
    and 80% of Austrians are against Ankara's membership.

    Angela Merkel, leader of Germany's Christian Democratic Union and
    possibly Germany's next chancellor, launched a campaign last month
    to block Turkey's entry into the EU, sending letters to European
    leaders asking them to offer Turkey only a "privileged partnership,"
    not full membership.

    "We are firmly convinced," she wrote, "that Turkey's membership would
    overtax the EU economically and socially and endanger the process of
    European integration."

    Opponents of Turkey's admission to the EU cite everything from
    clashing values to different cultures, a lack of a common geography,
    differences in religion and Ankara's record on human rights.

    Valery Giscard d'Estaing, the former president of France who drafted
    the latest version of the EU constitution, rejects Turkey's membership,
    declaring, "It would be the end of Europe."

    "There is an obvious contradiction between the pursuit of Europe's
    political integration and Turkish entry into European institutions,"
    he says.

    Former EU commissioner Frits Bolkestein, a Dutchman who used to be
    responsible for the EU's internal markets, taxation and customs union,
    warns that letting Turkey join the EU will trigger a massive wave of
    migration that could result in Europe being "Islamized."

    "The liberation of Vienna in 1683 [from a siege by the Ottoman Turks]
    would have been in vain," he says.

    Even Pope Benedict XVI has waded into the debate. Last year, when he
    was still Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, he told the French newspaper Le
    Figaro Turkey threatens European culture.

    "Turkey has always represented a different continent, in permanent
    contrast to Europe," he said. "Making the two continents identical
    would be a mistake. It would mean a loss of richness, the disappearance
    of the culture to the benefit of economics."

    "Europe has a culture which gives it a common identity," the
    then-Cardinal said. "The roots which formed this continent are those
    of Christianity."

    On the eve of today's talks, Austria made a last-ditch attempt to
    block any agreement on the ground rules for the negotiations by
    demanding diplomats should clearly set out "alternatives" to giving
    Turkey full EU membership.

    Last week, the European Parliament grudgingly approved opening
    negotiations with Turkey, but passed a non-binding resolution that
    insists Turkey must acknowledge that the killing of Armenians under
    Ottoman rule in 1915 was genocide before it will be admitted to the
    EU. Those moves have infuriated Turkey, which has patiently been
    trying to get into the EU for 42 years.

    Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul has already warned "should [the
    EU] place anything short of full membership [on the table], or any
    new conditions, we will walk away. And this time, it will be for good."

    Turkish public opinion, which overwhelmingly favours joining the EU,
    has grown increasingly frustrated over European preconditions.

    In 1963, when John Kennedy was still president of the United States
    and Turkey was a bulwark against communism and a key member in NATO,
    the Turks were granted associate membership in the European Economic
    Community, the EU's predecessor.

    But after Ankara applied for full, formal membership in 1987 it had
    to wait until 1999 to be recognized as an EU "candidate."

    In the meantime, such fledgling democracies as post-Franco Spain,
    post-Salazar Portugal, Greece, after it sent the military back to
    their barracks, and the former communist countries of Eastern Europe
    were all accepted into the EU.

    Turkey still waits and successive Turkish governments have repeatedly
    adopted EU-recommended reforms to pave the way for its admission.

    They've passed laws to end torture, to abolish state security courts
    and to reduce the political role of the military. They reformed
    Turkey's civil code, gave women equal rights to household property
    and ended their need to obtain their husband's permission to work
    outside the home.

    They've abolished the death penalty, rewritten the criminal code,
    and legalized the use of Kurdish in education and broadcasting.

    Despite growing opposition from hard-line Islamists and nationalist
    politicians, Ankara's moderate Islamic government continues to press
    for EU membership.

    Turkey's elite, infatuated with the promises of liberal democracy,
    long to be regarded as part of Europe, without becoming Westernized.

    Turkey's poor lust after the economic advantages of EU membership.

    Still, there are Islamist religious leaders who warn of being corrupted
    by the West and Turkish nationalists who feel their country is being
    humiliated.

    Britain, one of the strongest supporters of Turkey's EU candidacy,
    says it wants to see a staunch NATO ally, who straddles a strategically
    crucial piece of real estate, safely inside Europe.

    The possibility would allow Europe to shape a new accommodation between
    Islam and the secular West and might even give the continent a bigger
    say in the Middle East.

    "It would be a huge betrayal of the hopes and expectations of
    the Turkish people and of [Turkey's] Prime Minister [Recep Tayyip]
    Erdogan's program of reform, if, at this crucial time, we turned our
    back on Turkey," British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said last week
    at the Labour Party conference in Brighton.

    Still, a clash of cultures that assumes religious overtones could
    have serious security repercussions for Europe, which already has 23
    million Muslims living inside its borders.

    "For the EU to cross the Bosporus is to move from a community based
    on centuries-old notions of shared history and geography to one based
    on shared democratic standards and the future," argues Timothy Garton
    Ash, an Oxford University historian.

    "Two logics clash at the gates of the Bosporus: the logic of unity
    and the logic of peace," he says.

    "If Europe is mainly about creating a coherent political community,
    with some aspirations to be a superpower, it stops on the western
    side of the Bosporus -- for another decade, at the least," he says.

    "If we think it is more urgent to promote democracy, respect for
    human rights, prosperity and therefore the chances for peace in the
    most dangerous region in the world, we step on to that bridge."

    GRAPHIC: Black & White Photo: STR, AFP, Getty Images; Members of
    the Turkish Nationalist Movement Party ...; Black & White Photo:
    Umit Bektas, Reuters; ...chant "no to Europe" during an anti-EU
    demonstration in the capital, Ankara, yesterday. Some 100,000 people
    turned out to protest their government's negotiations with the European
    Union, which open in Luxembourg today.

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X