Tweet
RUSSIA ON THE BRINK OF SEPARATION
Aram Abarahamian
Aravot.am
03 May 06
Those persons in Russia who are for "Russia for Russians" slogan and
encourage slaughters of foreigners perhaps are sincerely sure that they
assist in territorial integrity and power of their country. But it is
too easy to prove that they stimulize just the opposite process. When
an Armenian, Tajik or Azerbaijani is asked; "what do you do here,
go back to your country?" the ... for Russia are simply economic; it
means that their production or construction where foreigners work,
will stop, as Russian nation can't. But when the same is asked to
Tatars or Bashkirian or Yakuts who live in Moscow or in Tambov, it
is a serious threat to territorial integrity of the country because
if Russians want to live in Tambov themselves it will be very natural
that Tatars will want to in Kazan only themselves and it will be the
end of Russian state.
Russia has existed for centuries as an Empire. And national minority
should have a certain status in the Empire, perhaps not equal
to the "main" nation. When the major nation of the Empire begins
thinking that other nations disturb them, it is a /// of Empire
destruction. It happened to the Russian Empire at the end of 19th
century. In particularly Russian nationalists together with tsar
"okhranka" created and spread "The records of Zion wise men" for
slandering proposes. The Bolsheviks "internationalism" in the soviet
empire was imitated but it was an official ideology, which helped to
keep the empire for a while.
It is difficult to say with which it is possible to change
"internationalism". But it is obvious that the primitive nationalism
is supported by the authorities leads the country to separation. By
the way it is possible that the enemies of Russia understand it that
sponsor fascist moods.
Here our authority cherishes hopes with this country, which is on
the brink of separation. That's true, all these are too difficult
for them but making money and "keeping posts" is clear and obvious.
Aram Abarahamian
Aravot.am
03 May 06
Those persons in Russia who are for "Russia for Russians" slogan and
encourage slaughters of foreigners perhaps are sincerely sure that they
assist in territorial integrity and power of their country. But it is
too easy to prove that they stimulize just the opposite process. When
an Armenian, Tajik or Azerbaijani is asked; "what do you do here,
go back to your country?" the ... for Russia are simply economic; it
means that their production or construction where foreigners work,
will stop, as Russian nation can't. But when the same is asked to
Tatars or Bashkirian or Yakuts who live in Moscow or in Tambov, it
is a serious threat to territorial integrity of the country because
if Russians want to live in Tambov themselves it will be very natural
that Tatars will want to in Kazan only themselves and it will be the
end of Russian state.
Russia has existed for centuries as an Empire. And national minority
should have a certain status in the Empire, perhaps not equal
to the "main" nation. When the major nation of the Empire begins
thinking that other nations disturb them, it is a /// of Empire
destruction. It happened to the Russian Empire at the end of 19th
century. In particularly Russian nationalists together with tsar
"okhranka" created and spread "The records of Zion wise men" for
slandering proposes. The Bolsheviks "internationalism" in the soviet
empire was imitated but it was an official ideology, which helped to
keep the empire for a while.
It is difficult to say with which it is possible to change
"internationalism". But it is obvious that the primitive nationalism
is supported by the authorities leads the country to separation. By
the way it is possible that the enemies of Russia understand it that
sponsor fascist moods.
Here our authority cherishes hopes with this country, which is on
the brink of separation. That's true, all these are too difficult
for them but making money and "keeping posts" is clear and obvious.