Tweet
"GERMAN-FRENCH" MODEL FOR NAGORNI GARABAKH
Democratic Azerbaijan
May 4 2006
Caucasian countries have no choice but integration to regulate conflict
in the region.
France and Germany, used to be enemies, have chosen integration and
reached advanced development. Cooperation between both countries was
reached with the help of politicians, being known that first step
in this direction were taken during joint exploitation of iron mine
and coal.
Accordingly to chairman of Armenian National Bank, Tigran Sargasyan,
mentioned model should be applied in South Caucasus, especially because
Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia want to be members of European Union.
Economic state of the above states will be examined, and the level
of compliance of showings with EU Maastricht Treaty will be defined.
These showings are defined by rise in prices, ratio of state debts
to national produce, long-term interest rate etc.
"If we take into account rise in prices, only Armenia meets
requirements of the Treaty. Azerbaijan and Georgia will not comply
with it long time. Azerbaijan pursues policy of price conservation
attempting to regulate their rise by administrative way what leads
to breaking up macroeconomic stability", T. Sargasyan informed.
However, chairman of Armenian National Bank, misinterpreted facts.
One of the most significant showings necessary for being EU member
is average wage.
In Armenia it makes up 145, in Georgia - 113, and in Azerbaijan -
124 US dollars. Poverty level in Azerbaijan makes up 29%, in Armenia -
34% and in Georgia - 52%.
As for health care, in Azerbaijan 1,6 % of national produce is allotted
for this field. The same showing in Georgia is 0,5% and in Armenia
- 1,3%.
In Azerbaijan economic development rate runs up to 23,6%, in Georgia -
9,9% and in Armenia - 14%.
As for credit resources Azerbaijan enjoys better position than
Georgia and Armenia. Moreover, the worst court system is in Armenia,
and Georgia is leader of the region in the field of internet and
telecommunications.
Azerbaijan's economic growth goes on mainly owing to production,
processing and transportation of oil. 42% of national produce came
from this field. In Georgia service and transport tariff for oil and
gas pipelines are of great importance, at the same time in Armenia
construction and agriculture serves for formation of national produce.
Azerbaijan allots 650 millions of US dollars for military needs,
that is, 4 times more then Armenia.
As for export, Azerbaijan deals with oil transportation, Georgia
exports metal, and Armenia exports agricultural products and
non-precious stones.
Taking into account all these facts, it is clear that "economic
integration" of Azerbaijan and Armenia is out of question.
If we recollect the fact that Armenia pursues policy of terrorism and
occupation, then realization "German-French model" for regulation of
Nagorni Garabakh conflict is no more but illusion.
http://www.demaz.org/cgi-bin/e-cms/vis/ vis.pl?s=001&p=0055&n=001474&g=
Democratic Azerbaijan
May 4 2006
Caucasian countries have no choice but integration to regulate conflict
in the region.
France and Germany, used to be enemies, have chosen integration and
reached advanced development. Cooperation between both countries was
reached with the help of politicians, being known that first step
in this direction were taken during joint exploitation of iron mine
and coal.
Accordingly to chairman of Armenian National Bank, Tigran Sargasyan,
mentioned model should be applied in South Caucasus, especially because
Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia want to be members of European Union.
Economic state of the above states will be examined, and the level
of compliance of showings with EU Maastricht Treaty will be defined.
These showings are defined by rise in prices, ratio of state debts
to national produce, long-term interest rate etc.
"If we take into account rise in prices, only Armenia meets
requirements of the Treaty. Azerbaijan and Georgia will not comply
with it long time. Azerbaijan pursues policy of price conservation
attempting to regulate their rise by administrative way what leads
to breaking up macroeconomic stability", T. Sargasyan informed.
However, chairman of Armenian National Bank, misinterpreted facts.
One of the most significant showings necessary for being EU member
is average wage.
In Armenia it makes up 145, in Georgia - 113, and in Azerbaijan -
124 US dollars. Poverty level in Azerbaijan makes up 29%, in Armenia -
34% and in Georgia - 52%.
As for health care, in Azerbaijan 1,6 % of national produce is allotted
for this field. The same showing in Georgia is 0,5% and in Armenia
- 1,3%.
In Azerbaijan economic development rate runs up to 23,6%, in Georgia -
9,9% and in Armenia - 14%.
As for credit resources Azerbaijan enjoys better position than
Georgia and Armenia. Moreover, the worst court system is in Armenia,
and Georgia is leader of the region in the field of internet and
telecommunications.
Azerbaijan's economic growth goes on mainly owing to production,
processing and transportation of oil. 42% of national produce came
from this field. In Georgia service and transport tariff for oil and
gas pipelines are of great importance, at the same time in Armenia
construction and agriculture serves for formation of national produce.
Azerbaijan allots 650 millions of US dollars for military needs,
that is, 4 times more then Armenia.
As for export, Azerbaijan deals with oil transportation, Georgia
exports metal, and Armenia exports agricultural products and
non-precious stones.
Taking into account all these facts, it is clear that "economic
integration" of Azerbaijan and Armenia is out of question.
If we recollect the fact that Armenia pursues policy of terrorism and
occupation, then realization "German-French model" for regulation of
Nagorni Garabakh conflict is no more but illusion.
http://www.demaz.org/cgi-bin/e-cms/vis/ vis.pl?s=001&p=0055&n=001474&g=