Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TOL: Georgia's Contagious Separatism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TOL: Georgia's Contagious Separatism

    Transitions Online, Czech Republic
    May 12 2006

    Georgia's Contagious Separatism

    by David Young
    11 May 2006

    Georgian leaders promise new roads and development in a bid to subdue
    demands for greater autonomy by Armenians in the country's south.

    TBILISI, Georgia | It seems only natural for minorities in the former
    Soviet Union to feel a constant pull toward separatism. Their
    national borders were drawn almost arbitrarily - often to encourage
    conflicts - and a nascent sense of self-determination that followed
    the end of Soviet communism certainly plays a role in the region's
    separatism, even today. Georgians, in particular, have witnessed
    their share of nationalist struggles, together leaving thousands dead
    and hundreds of thousands homeless.

    In Georgia's region of Javakheti, however, the potential for conflict
    has always rested just beneath the surface, requiring a greater and
    untapped impetus to inspire rebellion. As Georgia's southernmost
    region, Javakheti shares a border with Armenia, but not just a
    border: More than 90 percent of its people have language or cultural
    ties to the neighboring state. Despite being born in Georgia, few of
    these people, many of them descendants of Armenian families moved to
    Georgia in the early Soviet period, feel any allegiance to Georgia at
    all. Culturally, linguistically, and politically, most Georgian
    nationals in Javakheti are Armenian.

    And while any unrest in Javakheti pales in comparison to the tension
    in Abkhazia and South Ossetia - Georgia's authentic separatist
    regions, which enjoy de facto autonomy under Russian patronage -
    Javakheti has all the makings of a civil ethnic conflict. Not only is
    Armenian the most common language, but Javakheti has a better
    relationship with Yerevan, Armenia's capital, than it does with the
    Georgian capital, Tbilisi. The central government provides little
    financial assistance to Javakheti, citing economic difficulties and
    limited resources, which inevitably leave the underdeveloped region's
    infrastructure in pieces and the people alienated.

    Unlike in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, calls for secession or reunion
    with the "home country" have never been quite as loud in Javakheti.
    Yet the signs can be read of unrest tethered to economic and cultural
    concerns - both typical catalysts for heating up conflicts.

    Armenian political groups on both sides of the border continuously
    push Tbilisi to give the Armenian language equal official status to
    the Georgian tongue in the Javakheti region. Armenian is already
    spoken in the schools, despite a law that requires public schools in
    Georgia to teach the Georgian language and Georgian history above all
    others. Javakheti's Armenians neither speak the Georgian language nor
    know the history of Georgians. When fewer than one in 10 people in
    the region speak Georgian and when the local bureaucracies and
    infrastructure are entirely sustained by Armenians, such a law could
    hardly be enforced.

    Javakh Armenians' demands go beyond language rights. They call for
    mandatory teaching of Armenian history in local schools, an end to
    the general `Georgianization' of Armenian culture and heritage, a
    Georgian minority rights law, the construction of a highway linking
    Javakheti to Yerevan (which Armenia will finance), and the
    recognition of Javakheti political movements pushing for the region's
    political autonomy.

    RUSSIA AND THE BASE

    Perhaps the most important immediate concern for Armenians living in
    Javakheti is the Russian military base in Akhalkalaki, the region's
    capital. After years of negotiations, Russia has agreed to withdraw
    by the end of 2007 from the base that has been a crutch to
    Javakheti's economy since its opening in the mid-1990s when Georgia
    agreed to the Russian military presence in order to stabilize the
    recently independent country. Upwards of 10,000 locals are dependent
    on the income of the thousand or so, mostly Armenian, workers at the
    base. Moreover, the Russian troops consume a big slice of Javakheti's
    farm products - the region's primary source of income. President
    Mikheil Saakashvili has promised that the Georgian government will
    fill the void left by the Russian military, whose departure is a
    great cause for celebration in Tbilisi, despite years of protest by
    Armenians living both in Armenia and Javakheti. Specifically,
    Saakashvili proposed to use the produce consumed by Russian troops to
    feed Georgian troops instead, but many analysts have suggested that
    the region produces far more potatoes and milk than the Georgian army
    can consume. Besides, inviting Georgian soldiers to Akhalkalaki would
    likely add kindling to the tension. Recognizing this, Saakashvili
    altered his remedy on a visit to Javakheti in late April, saying
    "We're not planning to set up a new military unit" there and offering
    social programs and business training for people affected by the
    Russian pullout.

    "These people must not feel they will lose out on the deal. On the
    contrary, they must benefit from the fact that Georgia is
    developing," Saakashvili said, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
    reported.

    Another solution put forward recently by Parliamentary Speaker Nino
    Burjanadze is to establish `food processing enterprises' in
    Akhalkalaki to create new jobs. The ethnic Armenians in Javakheti are
    understandably skeptical.

    For its part, Russia has its own ambitions in a Caucasus that has
    looked increasingly to the West to provide its necessary political
    and economic support. Armenia happily gives Moscow its desired
    influence in the southern Caucasus, in exchange for Russian
    protection from Armenia's neighbors Turkey and Azerbaijan, both of
    which maintain strict blockades at their borders with Armenia. The
    dispute over Turkish responsibility for the mass killing and abuse of
    Armenians during and after World War I has long frozen
    Armenian-Turkish relations. And Azerbaijan is no friendlier, having
    been humiliated by Russian-backed Armenia in the early 1990s in the
    Nagorno-Karabakh war and forced to tolerate an island of
    Armenian-dominated land in the middle of its territory.

    Yet regardless of any real or exaggerated threat to Armenia, Russia
    has always been eager to manipulate the region's conflicts - much to
    Tbilisi's fury - in Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Nagorno-Karabakh.
    And for years some in Tbilisi have accused Russia of colluding and
    inciting conflict in Javakheti, most recently in March after
    Armenians stormed a courtroom and a university building in
    Akhalkalaki, two days after an ethnic Armenian was killed in a fight
    in a neighboring region. As Georgian politicians often do, Parliament
    Speaker Burjanadze hinted that outsiders were fomenting separatism
    among the Armenian minority. The protests and general unrest in
    Javakheti, she suggested, could be attributed to `external forces ...
    serious forces, who try to trigger destabilization in this region,"
    the website Civil Georgia reported. This was seen as a coded punch at
    Russia for its military presence in Akhalkalaki. Some Tbilisi
    officials alleged that weapons belonging to Parvents, a Javakh
    paramilitary group, could be traced to the Akhalkalaki base and were
    used in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Naturally, Russia continues to
    deny this, and as recently as 26 April, Georgia's own interior
    minister, Vano Merabishvili, said Moscow has had nothing to do with
    the recent unrest in Javakheti, despite Russia's regional interests.

    MOUTHPIECES

    Much of the public outcry over Tbilisi's poor treatment of its
    Armenian citizens actually comes from political parties in the
    Armenian ruling coalition, which have a greater capacity for
    political mudslinging than their relatively disorganized and
    inexperienced Javakh counterparts. One party, Zor Airenik (Mighty
    Homeland) was even formed by natives of Javakheti who now live in
    Armenia (there are more than 100,000 such emigrants, most of whom
    left for economic reasons). And other parties, such as Nor Serund
    (New Generation), the Armenian Democratic-Liberal Union, and Ramkavar
    Azatakan all have similar agendas for the security the Armenians in
    Javakheti who, they say, live in fear of ethnically motivated
    harassment and violence. Nearly all these parties argue that
    increased political autonomy and self-governance in Javakheti are
    warranted given Javakheti's ostracized culture and its security
    concerns.

    These moderate parties often call on the Saakashvili administration
    to pay more attention to the needs of Javakheti and its residents,
    while seldom encouraging the outright secession of Javakheti. Merely
    calling for `political autonomy' was deemed separatist enough for
    Tbilisi to prohibit Virk, a local political movement in Javakheti,
    from registering as a political party in July 2002. No wonder then
    that most ethnic Armenians who run for Georgia's parliament do so
    under the auspices of a mainstream party - like Saakashvili's
    National Movement Party - while openly defending the interests of
    Georgia's ethnic Armenians.

    The Armenian lobby in the Georgian parliament is far from united,
    though. A handful of parliamentarians, among them Van Baiburt, a
    native of Javakheti, often hear voices saying they aren't hard enough
    for Javakh interests. On 16 March, Baiburt caused grumbling in
    Javakheti when he said, `The Georgian authorities are not imposing
    any restrictions on Georgia's Armenian population,' and went on, `The
    government has agreed to allow official business to be conducted in
    Armenian in the area' because Tbilisi understands that it is
    `unreasonable' to expect and demand that Armenians suddenly speak
    Georgian. And in any case, he noted, it is unrealistic for
    Javakheti's civil society to demand a heightened status for the
    Armenian language in Javakheti.

    In an October 2005 interview, Baiburt even indicated that he believed
    Russia and Armenian radicals were to blame for Javakheti's dangerous
    separatist leanings. Unsurprisingly, then, Javakheti's moderate
    politicians - and certainly the radical ones - feel abandoned by
    politicians like Baiburt. As a result, Javakh Armenians feel they
    must look for help from Armenia and, to a lesser extent, Javakheti's
    local government and civil society.

    In response, the Georgian government and media often paint
    Javakheti's Armenian advocacy groups as instigators of separatist and
    anti-Tbilisi sentiment in the region, and the authorities cite such
    concerns as a basis for keeping civil-society groups from becoming
    recognized political parties. While Virk's political ambition has
    received the most attention, other local civic organizations, such as
    the United Javakh-Democratic Alliance (a union of eight youth
    organizations) and Javakh, another group also pushing for political
    autonomy, are encountering equal resistance for allegedly instigating
    violence. Virk leader David Rstakian, however, attributes the
    relative calm in Javakheti (compared to South Ossetia and Abkhazia)
    to the restraint of these demonized groups, which he says actually
    prevent Armenian protests from escalating into outright separatism.
    In the past, Rstakian has also insisted that outright secession or
    reunion with Armenia is not necessary to ensure the safety and
    prosperity of the Javakh people.

    The United Javakh-Democratic Alliance leader takes a less measured
    tone. Vahan Chakhalian has said that the Russian withdrawal will
    leave local Armenians defenseless and that his organization would be
    forced to retaliate if Georgian troops tried to use the base -
    regardless of whether they, too, would purchase much of the locally
    grown produce. Such declarations are eerily similar to those put
    forward by Abkhazian and South Ossetian separatists in the early
    1990s, immediately preceding two very bloody and still unresolved
    conflicts.

    On the other side of the border, Dashnaktsutiun, a radical
    century-old political party in Armenia and a member, although not an
    influential one, in the ruling parliamentary coalition, often reacts
    heatedly to Tbilisi's policies in Javakheti, even warning that
    discriminatory policies in Javakheti give the people `no other choice
    than the use of force to protect their interests and dignity.'

    So far, the bulk of the political parties and movements in Javakheti
    are not pushing for violent resistance, but they are pushing for
    cultural and political autonomy, if not outright secession and
    reunification with Armenia. But Javakh Armenians may not need much
    saber rattling to push them over the edge, as events in the last year
    illustrate.

    APPROACHING THE THRESHOLD

    The past year has seen local Armenians take to the streets on several
    occasions, flying several metaphorical banners of resistance. In
    March 2005, 6,000 Javakh Armenians rallied in Akhalkalaki to protest
    a resolution in the Georgian parliament that called for the
    withdrawal of the Russian base. They also aired many other
    grievances.

    In July, Armenians from the city of Samsar refused to allow a group
    of students and nuns from Tbilisi to restore a nearby medieval
    church, accusing them of intent to `Georgianize' the Armenian church
    and culture. The dispute quickly turned physical and left a number of
    people seriously injured. The same day, in Akhalkalaki, a number of
    Javakh Armenians and Greeks decried "Georgianization" in a protest at
    a Georgian school.

    In October, Tbilisi tax officials closed 10 small Armenian-owned
    shops in Akhalkalaki for financial irregularities, setting off
    protests by hundreds in front of the district's state administration
    building. Local police tried to disband the demonstrators with rubber
    truncheons and by firing gunshots into the air, injuring many of
    them.

    And this year on 9 March, an ethnic Armenian was killed in a bar
    fight in Tsalka, a city in Javakheti's neighboring Kvemo-Kartli
    region; soon afterward, hundreds of ethnic Armenians marched in
    memory of the man they called a victim of the climate of ethnic
    intolerance. The jail holding the suspected killers was soon
    surrounded by protesters calling for swift justice.

    Only two days later, Armenians gathered in Akhalkalaki to protest the
    dismissal of an ethnic Armenian judge, the latest of several fired
    (the protestors said) for not knowing and using the Georgian language
    in court. To reinforce the now-frequent demand that the Armenian
    tongue be given equal status with Georgian, the protesters raided a
    local courtroom, ousted a Georgian judge, and then stormed a Georgian
    Orthodox church and the local branch of Tbilisi State University.
    United Javakh issued a statement condemning the judges' dismissals as
    `cynically trampling on the rights of the Armenian-populated region.'
    More broadly, the statement warned that the "destructive trends in
    the Georgian government's policy" illustrated Tbilisi's desire to
    `crush the will of Javakh's Armenian population to protect its right
    to live in its motherland."

    A Georgian ombudsman quickly tried to cut the tension with a finding
    that the Tsalka bar fight was merely a `communal crime' with no
    ethnic basis, and other Georgian officials continue to maintain that
    the judges were fired for misconduct alone. Nevertheless, in the past
    Tbilisi has appointed a number of judges in Javakheti who speak no
    Armenian and must use translators to conduct judicial proceedings,
    much to the frustration of local Armenians, who charge Tbilisi with
    cultural imperialism.

    In the last two months, Javakhetians have held a number of organized
    and spontaneous protest rallies and physically blockaded the Russian
    military withdrawal. Eager to facilitate the departure of the Russian
    troops, Saakashvili on 28 April asked his Armenian counterpart,
    Robert Kocharian, to help ease the tension in Javakheti.

    MEETING HALFWAY?

    While visiting Akhalkalaki on 19 April, Saakashvili pledged to put an
    end to Javakheti's isolation in Georgia, beginning with the
    construction of a road from Akhalkalaki to the capital of the
    neighboring Samtskhe region, Akhaltsikhe, and another connecting
    Akhalkalaki to Tbilisi. Funded by the U.S. Millennium Challenge
    Account, these infrastructure developments would boost local
    agriculture and attract new business to the area. "Roads and
    development: These are what Javakheti needs now," he said.

    With policies like these, it seems that Tbilisi is hoping to recruit
    friendly Javakh Armenians by encouraging interaction between
    Georgia's diverse ethnicities. Georgian decision makers may reckon
    that better transport will lead to better cooperation and perhaps
    enough assimilation to quell separatist rhetoric and ambitions.

    In fact, if national policies like these actually come to fruition,
    they could help integrate and intertwine the Georgian and Armenian
    communities through significant economic and humanitarian gains. But
    these are not the gains that the Armenians insist they need most: For
    instance, Javakheti will get an important highway, but it traverses
    the 300 kilometers to Tbilisi, not Yerevan.

    Tbilisi refuses to give Javakheti a broader self-governance or
    autonomy package because such policies are seen as just as likely to
    isolate Javakheti even further. Worse still, loosening the leash
    might set a dangerous precedent for successful separatism. So it
    seems, then, that the politicians have no choice but to return to the
    scales and reset the balance for another day of gambling, perhaps
    hoping simply to break even.


    David Young works for the Georgian Foundation for Strategic and
    International Studies in Tbilisi.
Working...
X